SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Current Problems in Terms of Supervision Process of School Principals’ Views

Okul Yöneticilerinin Denetim Sürecine İlişkin Güncel Sorunlari

Celal Teyyar UĞURLU
Pages
184–196
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They should be carried out by using an approach which includes long term, detailed and problem based activities

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Knowledge in the field of educational administration and supervision forces the school principal to change.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the study group, six primary and four secondary school principals from each of Adıyaman and Sivas provinces in Turkey, thus, a total 20 principals have been interviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They should be carried out by using an approach which includes long term, detailed and problem based activities
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Knowledge in the field of educational administration and supervision forces the school principal to change. As well as management actions force the principals to change, supervision actions have an active role for the principals to develop and modify themselves. The purpose of this study is to reveal the principals’ problems with the supervision process in Turkey through the views of the principals working at primary and secondary schools. In this qualitative study, maximum diversity sampling method was used for in depth exploration of the rich states. As the study group, six primary and four secondary school principals from each of Adıyaman and Sivas provinces in Turkey, thus, a total 20 principals have been interviewed. Descriptive analysis technique was used for the data analysis. School principals stated that supervision generally focused on the supervision of structural condition and documents and they added that there wasn’t an in depth supervision regarding supervision process. They should be carried out by using an approach which includes long term, detailed and problem based activities

Özet

Yönetim eylemlerinin yöneticiyi değişmeye zorlamasının yanında denetim eylemleri de yöneticinin kendisini yenilemesinde ve değiştirmesinde, eksikliklerinin farkına varmasını sağlamasında önemli bir etken olarak görev üstlenir. Bu nedenle denetim sürecine ilişkin sorunlar denetim sürecinin sağlıklı bir yapı ve işleyişe kavuşturulmasında önemlidir. Araştırma çalışma grubu için, Türkiye'de Sivas ve Adıyaman illerinde ilköğretim düzeyinde 6'şar ilköğretim okulu müdürü, ortaöğretim düzeyinde ise 4'er okul müdürü olmak üzere toplan 20 okul müdürü ile görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde betimsel analiz kullanılmıştır Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre denetmenlerin ve denetim sisteminin yeniliklere cevap veremediği, nitelikli bir süreç denetiminin yapılamadığı görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞURLU, C. T. (2022). Current Problems in Terms of Supervision Process of School Principals’ Views. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 184–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/531883

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., Yıldırım, E. (2005). Social science research method. Sakarya: Sakarya publication. Aydın, M. (1994). Contemporary education supervision. Ankara:
  2. Pegem. Aydın, M.(1996). Education sociology lesson notes. Malatya. Aydın, İ. ( 2005). Teaching supervision: Status detection, evaluation and development. Ankara:
  3. Pegem. Aypay, A. ( 2010 ) Problems related to the supervision profile. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8 (3), 593- 622. Balcı, A. (2002). Developing effective school. Ankara:
  4. Pegem. Behlol, M.G., Yousuf, K.I., Parveen, Q., Kayani, M.M. (2011). Concept of supervision and supervisory practices at primary level in pakistan. International Education Studies, 4 (4), 28-35.
  5. Beycioğlu, K., Dönmez, B. (2009) Rethinking educational supervision. Inonu University Journal of Education, 10 (2) 71-93.
  6. Boydak Özan, M. ve Özdemir, T.Y. (2010). The psychological stress of supervision on teachers. 2 nd InternationalEducation Supervision Congress, 23-25
  7. June, Kütahya. Bulach, C.,Boothe, D. & Michael,P. (1994) Supervisory behaviors that affect school climate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Asociation, April 19 -23, Montreal, Canada. Burgaz, B. (1995). Some supervision roles which are not carried out sufficiently in the supervision of Primary Education Institutions and the reasons. The Journalof Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 11, 127- 134. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1991). New Structure and behavior in school management. Ankara:
  8. Pegem. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak,. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research methods. Ankara:
  9. Pegem. Çelik, V. (2002). Fundamental inclinations which lead policy of training education administrator. Symposium of 21st Century Education Administrator Training, 16-21 Mayıs 2002,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Demircioğlu, İ. H. (2006). A qualitative study on the learning styles of history teachers candidates. Educational Studies, 6, 23. Doğanay, E. (2006). Comparison of the supervision services carried out at primary schools and secondary schools in rural areas, Unpublished postgraduate thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van. Ergen, N. (1977). Lesson supervision at the secondary schools which are under the supervision of Ministry of National Education. Lesson Work? Ankara.
  12. Fehr, S. J. K. (2001). The role of the education supervisor in United States public schools from 1970 to 2000 as reflected in the supervision literature, the degree of do