SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

A Model to Explain the Observed Tendency to Aggression in University Students

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Gözlenen Saldırganlık Eğilimlerinin Açıklanmasına Dönük Bir Model

Fatih CAMADAN
Hikmet YAZICI
Pages
343–360
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results obtained from the study show that aggression is explained significantly by the variables of perfectionism (β=.13; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Some approaches in psychology (e.g.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of 2744 university students studying in seven different cities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results obtained from the study show that aggression is explained significantly by the variables of perfectionism (β=.13; p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Some approaches in psychology (e.g. Psychoanalysis) define aggression as an inborn behavior while some others (e.g. Behaviorism) define it as an acquired behavior. However, today it is a more widely admitted idea that aggression is a product of heredity-environment interactions and it has a relation with different psycho-social variables. It is observed that aggression was tried to be explained by more basic research models in previous studies. In this study; however, it was preferred to form a complex model to explain aggression selected as a dependent variable. The main objective of the study in this context is to examine the relation between aggression and the variables of perfectionism, forgiveness and coping with stress. The study group consists of 2744 university students studying in seven different cities. The data of the study was analyzed with the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results obtained from the study show that aggression is explained significantly by the variables of perfectionism (β=.13; p

Özet

Psikoloji alanındaki bazı yaklaşımlar (ör. Psikanaliz) saldırganlığı doğuştan getirilen, bazıları ise (ör. Davranışçılık) sonradan kazanılan bir davranış olarak tanımlar. Bununla birlikte bu davranışın kalıtım-çevre etkileşiminin bir ürünü olduğu ve farklı psiko-sosyal değişkenlerle ilişki sergilediği, günümüzde daha yaygın kabul edilen bir görüştür. Önceki çalışmalarda, saldırganlık eğilimlerinin daha basit araştırma modelleriyle açıklanmaya çalışıldığı gözlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada bağımlı değişken olarak seçilen saldırganlığı daha iyi açıklamak için karmaşık bir modelin oluşturulması tercih edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın temel amacı; saldırganlık eğilimlerinin, mükemmeliyetçilik, affetme ve stresle başa çıkma değişkenleriyle ilişkilerini incelemektir. Araştırma grubu, Türkiye'nin farklı şehirlerinde bulunan yedi üniversitede öğrenim gören, 2744 öğrenciden (Kız= 1493, Erkek=1251) oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (YEM) ve bazı çıkarımlı istatistik teknikleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, saldırganlık eğilimlerinin mükemmeliyetçilik (?=.13; p

🔖

Cite This Article

CAMADAN, F., YAZICI, H. (2022). A Model to Explain the Observed Tendency to Aggression in University Students. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 343–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/531762

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aldwin, M. & Revenson, T. A. (1987). Does Coping Help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 337-348.
  2. Allemand, M., Steiner, M. & Hill, P. L. (2013). Effects of forgiveness intervention for older adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 279-286.
  3. Aşçıoğlu Önal, A. (2014). An investigation of the predictive role of cognitive distortions, empathy, and rumination level on forgiveness. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ankara University, The Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  4. Atay, S. (2015). Examinining the relations between traumatic stress and aggressive behavior, impulsivity, academic success in Kocaeli university faculty of medicine, 1.st and 5.TH- 6.TH class students. Unpublished master’s thesis. Kocaeli University, The Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli. Ayan, S. (2007). Aggressiveness tendencies of the children exposed to domestic violence. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 8(3), 206-214.
  5. Ayten, A. (2009). Forgiveness and religion: An empirical study on the relation between forgiveness attitudes and religiosity. Marmara University Journal of the Faculty of Divinity, 37(2), 111-128.
  6. Barber, L., Maltby, J., & Macaskill, A. (2005). Angry memories and thoughts of revenge: The relationship between forgiveness and anger rumination. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 253-262.
  7. Başaran, C. (2008). The research of the aggressiveness of the students studying at different kinds of high schools. Unpublished master’s thesis. Sakarya University, The Institute of Education Sciences, Sakarya. Basut, E. (2004). The study of stress, coping with stress and personality patterns of adolescents who incline to crime and not. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ankara University, The Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
  8. Basut, E. (2006). Stress, coping and adolescence. Turkish Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13(1), 31- 36. Bauman, S., & Baldasare, A. (2015). Cyber aggression among college students: demographic differences, predictors of distress, and the role of the university. Journal of College Student Development, 56(4), 317-330.
  9. Baumeister, R. E., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge, theory, two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological speculations (pp.79-107). Philadelphia: The Templeton Foundation Press.
  10. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine gi