Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Assisting the Client in Aphasia Speech Therapy: A Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Cueing Practices

Pages
2082–2
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It therefore highlights the active role played by the client in negotiating the assistance needed by the therapist and, more broadly, in co-constructing the therapeutic process

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates aphasia speech therapy as a particular form of institutional interaction dedicated to the recovery of language and communicative abilities in adult speakers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This specific form of social interaction involves both health and pedagogical issues, by presenting features generally observed in instructional settings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It therefore highlights the active role played by the client in negotiating the assistance needed by the therapist and, more broadly, in co-constructing the therapeutic process
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates aphasia speech therapy as a particular form of institutional interaction dedicated to the recovery of language and communicative abilities in adult speakers. This specific form of social interaction involves both health and pedagogical issues, by presenting features generally observed in instructional settings. The paper investigates these features by focusing on the interactional and sequential organisation of naming activity – that is, the activity of naming a card. Through detailed analyses of participants’ multimodal conduct, it is shown that this task (e.g. producing a specific linguistic item) is collaboratively accomplished. This defends a conception of the therapy as a socially situated and collaborative process, whose dynamics must be investigated taking into consideration participants’ multimodal resources. By focusing in particular on the cueing practices used by the therapist in order to assist the client’s word retrieval and production of the target item, the paper shows that these practices are strictly dependent on the micro-details of interaction, on the client’s audible and visible conduct, and as such are incrementally and locally occasioned. It therefore highlights the active role played by the client in negotiating the assistance needed by the therapist and, more broadly, in co-constructing the therapeutic process

🔖

Cite This Article

MERLINO, S. (2022). Assisting the Client in Aphasia Speech Therapy: A Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Cueing Practices. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 2082–2. https://ajindex.com/articles/531654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abel, S., Schultz, A., Radermacher, I., Willmes, K., Huber, W. (2005). Decreasing and increasing cues in naming therapy for aphasia. Aphasiology, 19(9), 831-848.
  2. Antaki, C., Crompton, R. J., Walton, C. & Finlay, W. M. L. (2017). How adults with a profound intellectual disability engage others in interaction. Sociology of Health and Illness. Retrieved October 2016 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12500/full.
  3. Antaki, C. & Kent, A. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 876-889.
  4. Boone, D. R., & Prescott, T. E. (1972). Content and sequence analyses of speech and hearing therapy. ASHA, 14, 58- 62. Brookshire, R. H. (1973). An introduction to aphasia. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
  5. Brookshire, R. H. (1976). A system for coding and recording events in patient-clinician intersections during aphasia treatment sessions. In R. H. Brookshire, H. Robert (Eds.), Proceedings of the Clinical Aphasiology Conference (Wemme, OR: May 18-21, 1976). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.
  6. Brookshire, R. H. (1992). An introduction to neurogenic communication disorders. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Brookshire, R. H., Krueger, K., Nicholas, L. & Cicciarelli, A. (1977). Analysis of clinician-patient interactions in aphasia treatment. In Brookshire, R. H. (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings (Amelia Island, FL: May 17-20, 1977) (pp. 181-187). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.
  7. Brouwer, C. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Ed.), Second language conversations (pp. 93-113). London: Continuum. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2004). Commentaries: Reflections on speech-language therapists’ talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39 (4), 477-480.
  8. Davis, A. (1993). A survey of adult aphasia and related language disorders. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Davis, A., Pring, T. (1991). Therapy for word-finding deficits: More on the effects of semantic and phonological approaches to treatment with dysphasic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 235-245.
  9. Doesborgh, S., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M., Dippel, D., van Harskamp, F., Koudstaal, P., Visch-Brink, E. (2004). Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke. A randomized co