SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Güvenli Bağlanma ve Affedicilik: Psikolojik Sağlamlığın Aracılık Rolü

Secure Attachment and Forgiveness: The Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience

Bahtiyar ERASLAN ÇAPAN
Pages
280–292
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings are discussed in line with the relevant literature available and conclusions are drawn

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at investigating the mediating effect of psychological resilience on secure attachment and forgiveness among university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were 293 university students (57% female, 43% male: mean age, 20.96 years; standard deviation (SD), 1.85) selected randomly and who were asked to complete a package, consisting of a Relationships Scale Questionnaire, an Ego Resiliency Scale, a Heartland Forgiveness Scale and a Personal Information Form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings are discussed in line with the relevant literature available and conclusions are drawn
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the mediating effect of psychological resilience on secure attachment and forgiveness among university students. The participants were 293 university students (57% female, 43% male: mean age, 20.96 years; standard deviation (SD), 1.85) selected randomly and who were asked to complete a package, consisting of a Relationships Scale Questionnaire, an Ego Resiliency Scale, a Heartland Forgiveness Scale and a Personal Information Form. The hypothesis tested the mediation effects of psychological resilience between secure attachment and forgiveness using structural equation modeling. The results of the analysis reveal the mediating role of psychological resilience between secure attachment and forgiveness. The findings are discussed in line with the relevant literature available and conclusions are drawn

Özet

Bu çalışmada üniversite öğrencilerinde güvenli bağlanma ve affedicilik arasında psikolojik sağlamlığın aracılık etkisi araştırılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan 293 üniversite öğrencisi (%57 kadın, %43 erkek; ortalama yaş 20.96, SD. 1.85) İlişki Ölçekleri Anketi, Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği, Heartland Affedicilik Ölçeği ve Kişisel Bilgi Formunu doldurmuşlardır. Araştırmanın hipotezi olan güvenli bağlanma ve affedicilik arasında psikolojik sağlamlığın aracılık rolü yapısal eşitlik modeli ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre üniversite öğrencilerinde psikolojik sağlamlık güvenli bağlanma ve affedicilik arasında aracı olduğu bulunmuştur. Bulgular ilişkili literatür ışığında tartışılmış ve sonuçlar yazılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAPAN, B. E. (2022). Güvenli Bağlanma ve Affedicilik: Psikolojik Sağlamlığın Aracılık Rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 280–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/531650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akhunlar, M. N. (2010). To investigate the relationship between attachment styles and adjustment process of university students. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Maltepe University, Turkey. Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1989). Attachment beyond infancy. American Psychological Association, 44 (4), 709-716.
  2. Ainsworth, M. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46(4), 333. Anderson, M. A. (2006). The relationship among resilience, forgiveness, and anger expression in adolescents. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Paper 416. Armitage, C. J., & Harris, P. R. (2006). The influence of adult attachment on symptom reporting: Testing a mediational model in a sample of the general population. Psychology and Health, 21(3), 351-366.
  3. Barthomew, K. & Horowitz L. M. (1991) Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-24.
  4. Begun, A. L. (1993). Human behavior and the social environment: The vulnerability, risk, and resilience model. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(1), 26-31.
  5. Benard, B. (1994). Applications of resilience. Paper presented at a conference on the role of resiliencein drug abuse, alcohol abuse, and mental illness, Washington, DC. Block, J. & Kremen, A.M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349–361.
  6. Bowlby J. (1973).
  7. Attachment and loss, Vol. II: Separation, Anxiety and Anger. New York, Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1982).
  8. Attachment and loss, Vol 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1988). A Securebase: Parent-child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. New York: Basic Books. Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 3-35.
  9. Broyles, L. C. (2005). Resilience: It’s relationship to forgiveness in older adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee. Bugay, A. ve Demir, A. (2010). A Turkish version of Heartland forgiveness scale. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1927-1931.
  10. Bugay, A. ve Demir, A. (2011).The features of transgression as predictors of forgiveness of others. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4 (35), 8-17
  11. Burnette, J. L., Taylor, K. W., Worthington, E. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (2007). Attachment and trait forgivingness: The mediating role of angry rumination. Personality and Indivi