Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Initiator and Mediator Variables that Affecting Organizational Dissent

Örgütsel Muhalefete Etki Eden Başlatıcı ve Aracı Değişkenler

Pages
284–300
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data of the study were collected with a “personal information” form, “Organizational Commitment Scale,” “Organizational Trust Scale,” “Organizational Support Scale” and “Organizational Dissent Scale.” As a result of the research, it was found that moral commitment that sub-dimension of organizational commitment did not have a statistically direct effect on any dissent dimension, but it had significant effect on the articulated dissent with the mediator role of organizational support, trust to management and trust to stakeholder.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to find out direct effects of organizational commitment, on organizational dissent and the mediator role of organizational support and organizational trust between organizational commitment and organizational dissent were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to test the proposed integrated model explaining relations among organizational commitment, organizational trust, organizational support, and organizational dissent.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data of the study were collected with a “personal information” form, “Organizational Commitment Scale,” “Organizational Trust Scale,” “Organizational Support Scale” and “Organizational Dissent Scale.” As a result of the research, it was found that moral commitment that sub-dimension of organizational commitment did not have a statistically direct effect on any dissent dimension, but it had significant effect on the articulated dissent with the mediator role of organizational support, trust to management and trust to stakeholder.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out direct effects of organizational commitment, on organizational dissent and the mediator role of organizational support and organizational trust between organizational commitment and organizational dissent were examined. The study used a correlational research design. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to test the proposed integrated model explaining relations among organizational commitment, organizational trust, organizational support, and organizational dissent. The data of the study were collected with a “personal information” form, “Organizational Commitment Scale,” “Organizational Trust Scale,” “Organizational Support Scale” and “Organizational Dissent Scale.” As a result of the research, it was found that moral commitment that sub-dimension of organizational commitment did not have a statistically direct effect on any dissent dimension, but it had significant effect on the articulated dissent with the mediator role of organizational support, trust to management and trust to stakeholder. Alienative commitment had a direct and indirect (with trust to management) effect on the articulated dissent. There was no significant effect of calculative commitment on any variables.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, “okul çalışanlarının örgütsel bağlılık algılarının örgütsel muhalefeti nasıl etkilediğini ve örgütsel bağlılığın örgütsel muhalefet üzerindeki etkisinde, örgütsel destek ve güvenin aracılık etkisinin olup olmadığının belirlenmesidir”. Araştırma, ilişkisel tarama modelinde bir çalışmadır. Çalışma, okul çalışanlarının örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel güven ve örgütsel destek algıları ile örgütsel muhalefet arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamaya yönelik bütünleşik bir model ortaya koyarak modelde yer alan değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi test etmek amacı ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada veriler; “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Örgütsel Bağlılık Ölçeği”, “Örgütsel Muhalefet Ölçeği”, “Örgütsel Güven Ölçeği” ve “Örgütsel Destek Ölçeği” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; örgütsel bağlılığın alt boyutu olan ahlaki bağlılığın, örgütsel muhalefetin boyutları üzerinde istatistiksel olarak doğrudan anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadığı ancak yöneticiye ve paydaşa güven ile örgütsel destek aracılığı ile dikey muhalefet üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Zoraki bağlılığın, dikey muhalefeti hem doğrudan hem de yöneticiye güven aracılığı ile etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Çıkarcı bağlılığın ise değişkenler üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, H., ÇELİK, K. (2022). Initiator and Mediator Variables that Affecting Organizational Dissent. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 284–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/531533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adams, S. H. and Wiswell, A. K. (2007, Mart). Dimensionality of Organizational Trust. International Research Conference in The Americas of the Academy of Human Resource Development, Indianapolis. Alijanpour, M., Dousti, M. and Alijanpour, M. (2013). The Relationship Between Organizational Commitment and Organizational Trust of Staff. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 1 (4), 45-52.
  2. Anyango, C., Ojera, P. and Ochieng, I. (2015). Meaning And Application of Employee Voice. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology, 2 (5), 10-16.
  3. Araslı, H., Bavik, A., Ekiz, E. H. (2006). The Effects of Nepotism on Human Resource Management: The Case of Three, Four- and Five-Star Hotels in Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26 (7/8), 295–308.
  4. Argon, T. (2016). Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre İlkokullarda Yöneticilerin Kayırmacılık Davranışları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24 (1), 233-250.
  5. Aydın M. (2000).
  6. Çağdaş Eğitim Denetimi, Ankara:
  7. Hatipoğlu Yayınları.
  8. Aydogan, İ. (2009). Favoritism in the Turkish educational system: Nepotism, cronyism and patronage. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 4 (1), 19-35.
  9. Balay, R. (2000). Örgütsel Bağlılık. Ankara:
  10. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Barut, B. (2015). İşyerinde irrasyonel davranışlar: “nepotizm, favorizm, kronizm” algısı üzerine nitel araştırma. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(20), 382-394.
  11. Baştug, G., Pala, A., Kumartaşli, M., Günel, İ. and Duyan, M. (2016). Investigation of the Relationship between Organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1418-1425.
  12. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Amos Uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitapevi. Baysal, A. C. ve Paksoy, M. (1999). Mesleğe ve Örgüte Bağlılığın Çok Yönlü İncelenmesinde Meyer-Allen Modeli.İ.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 7-15.
  13. BergDavid, N. (2011). Dissent: An Intergroup Perspective. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63 (1), 50–65.
  14. Bishwajit, M., Khumyu, A., Boonyanurak, P. (2016). Relationships between Organizational commitments, supervisory support and job satisfaction of nurses in a public specialized hospital Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 15(1), 39-44.
  15. Boe, T. A. (2002). Gaining and/or Maintaining Employee Trust Within Service Organizations. (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie, ABD. Bolman, L. G. ve Deal, T.E. (2013). Organizasyonları Yeniden Yapılandırmak