Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Identifying the Opinions of High School Administrators on Innovation and Its Implementations in Education

Okul Yöneticilerinin Eğitimde İnovasyon ve Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
669–683
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that the school administrators had difficulty defining the innovation concept.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to identify the perspectives of high school administrators and reveal the opinions of schools and school administrators about the innovational competencies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The phenomenological design was used to reveal the opinions of eight school administrators about the innovation concept in depth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that the school administrators had difficulty defining the innovation concept.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the perspectives of high school administrators and reveal the opinions of schools and school administrators about the innovational competencies. The phenomenological design was used to reveal the opinions of eight school administrators about the innovation concept in depth. The focus group interview technique was also used to collect the data. Content analysis and descriptive analysis techniques were implemented to analyze the data properly. As a result, it was found that the school administrators had difficulty defining the innovation concept. It is also stated by administrators that there is not a suitable environment to improve innovative actions and legal regulations and lack of beliefs restrict them from it. At the end of the research, it can be recommended that the instructions to increase the knowledge and experiences of the school administrators about innovation concept and process should be carried out.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı lise okul müdürlerinin inovasyon ve inovasyon yeterlilikleri hakkındaki düşüncelerini belirlemek ve ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi ve fenomonoloji deseni, sekiz adet okul müdürünün inovasyon hakkındaki düşüncelerini ortaya çıkarmak amacı ile kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada verilerin toplanması için ise odak grup görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Odak grup görüşmesi sonucu ortaya çıkan verileri analiz etmek için ise nitel analiz yöntemlerinden olan betimsel ve içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda okul müdürlerinin inovasyon kavramını tanımlamakta zorluk yaşadıkları görülmüştür. Aynı zamanda okul müdürleri inovasyon için uygun ortam bulunmadığını ve yasal düzenlemeler ile isteksizliğin inovasyon uygulamaları gerçekleştirmekte onları engellediğini belirtmişlerdir. Araştırmanın sonunda öğretmenlerin inovasyon kavramı hakkındaki bilgileri ve becerilerini artırmak için dersler verilmesi ve inovasyonu engelleyen yasal düzenlemeleri ortadan kaldırarak inovasyonu özendiren düzenlemeler yapılması tavsiye edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞDAN, M., GÜNGÖR, S., İPEK, Z. H. (2022). Identifying the Opinions of High School Administrators on Innovation and Its Implementations in Education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 669–683. https://ajindex.com/articles/531474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akin, U. (2016). Innovation Efforts in Education and School Administration: Views of Turkish School Administrators. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 243-260.
  2. Akpan, C. (2016). Innovative practices in school administration. International Journal of Educational Administration Planning and Research, 6(8), 45-53.
  3. Arpacı, İ. (2011). Kamu kurumlarında teknolojik inovasyon ve inovasyon politikası. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 38(2), 111-123.
  4. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339.
  5. Çelik, N. (2016). Yenilikçilik konusunda yapılan doktora tezlerinin içerik analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 2(1), 29-42.
  6. Chen, S. C., Hsiao, H. C., Chang, J. C., Shen, C. H., & Chou, C. M. (2010). School organizational innovative indicators for technical universities and institutes. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3(7), 43-50.
  7. Chen, S. C., Hsiao, H. C., Chang, J. C., Shen, C. H., & Chou, C. M. (2010). School organizational innovative indicators for technical universities and institutes. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3(7), 43-50.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Araştırma deseni: Nicel, nitel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (Çev. Edt. Selçuk Beşir DEMİR). Ankara:
  9. Eğiten Kitap. Dibbon, D. C., & Pollock, K. (2007). The nature of change and innovation in five innovative schools. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(1), 1-15.
  10. Erdemet, F. (2017). Özel Lise Yöneticilerinin İnovasyon Sürecine İlişkin Görüşleri (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) İstanbul Kültür University, İstanbul,
  11. Turkey. Gilad-Hai ve Somech (2016). The day after. The Journal of Educational Administration, 54(1), 25-36
  12. Goswami, S., & Mathew, M. (2005). Definition of innovation revisited: An empirical study on Indian information technology industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3), 371-383. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (2005). A joint publication of OECD and Eurostat, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Statistical Office of the European Communities. Hsiao, H. C., Chen, S. C., Chang, J. C., Chou, C. M., & Shen, C. H. (2009). Factors that influence school organisational innovation in technical institutes and universities. Practice, 15 (17), 71-76
  13. Hsiao, H.C., Chang, J.C., Sung, H.Y. and Chen, S.C. (2009). A study of con