Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

The Effectiveness of Response Interruption and Redirection in Reducing Stereotypes: A Meta-Analysis

Basmakalıp Davranışların Azaltılmasında Tepkiyi Yarıda Kesme ve Yeniden Yönlendirmenin Etkililiği: Meta-Analiz

Pages
838–857
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings also revealed that response interruption and redirection is an evidence-based practice in reducing verbal and motor stereotypes of children and youths with autism spectrum disorder.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the current meta-analysis is to analyze the studies that used response interruption and redirection in the reducing of stereotypes of children and youths with autism spectrum disorder, to identify the effect size of response interruption and redirection, and to determine whether response interruption and redirection is an evidence-based practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Totally, 4452 studies were screened based on the titles and abstracts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings also revealed that response interruption and redirection is an evidence-based practice in reducing verbal and motor stereotypes of children and youths with autism spectrum disorder.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the current meta-analysis is to analyze the studies that used response interruption and redirection in the reducing of stereotypes of children and youths with autism spectrum disorder, to identify the effect size of response interruption and redirection, and to determine whether response interruption and redirection is an evidence-based practice. Totally, 4452 studies were screened based on the titles and abstracts. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to 50 studies, and 26 studies were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Eight studies out of 24 studies met the standard with and without reservation. The quality assessment was conducted for eight studies. Based on the quality assessment, seven out of eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The percentage of non-overlapping data score was 89%, the Tau-U score was 90%, and the improvement rate difference score was 89% for response interruption and redirection. Effect size calculation indicated that response interruption and redirection was effective in reducing verbal and motor stereotypes of children and youths with autism spectrum disorder, and the effect size is medium and high. The findings also revealed that response interruption and redirection is an evidence-based practice in reducing verbal and motor stereotypes of children and youths with autism spectrum disorder.

Özet

Bu meta-analizin amacı, otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocuk ve gençlerin basmakalıp davranışlarının azaltılmasında tepkiyi yarıda kesme ve yeniden yönlendirme kullanılan çalışmaları analiz etmek, tepkiyi yarıda kesme ve yeniden yönlendirmenin etki büyüklüğünü ve kanıta-dayalı bir uygulama olup olmadığını belirlemektir. İlk olarak 4452 çalışma başlıklara ve özetlere göre taranmıştır. Elli çalışmaya dahil etme ve dışlama ölçütleri uygulanmış, dahil etme ölçütlerini karşılamadıkları için 26 çalışma meta-analizden dışlanmıştır. Yirmi dört çalışmadan sekizi desen standartlarını karşılamış veya koşullu karşılamış, bu sekiz çalışma için kalite değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Kalite değerlendirmesine dayanarak, sekiz çalışmadan yedisi meta-analize dahil edilmiştir. Tepkiyi yarıda kesme ve yeniden yönlendirme için örtüşmeyen veri yüzdesi değeri %89, Tau-U değeri %90 ve ilerleme oranı farkı %89 bulunmuştur. Etki büyüklüğü hesaplamaları, tepkiyi yarıda kesme ve yeniden yönlendirmenin otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocukların ve gençlerin sözel ve motor basmakalıp davranışlarını azaltmada etkili olduğunu ve etki büyüklüğünün orta ve yüksek düzeyde olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgular ayrıca tepkiyi yarıda kesme ve yeniden yönlendirmenin otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocukların ve gençlerin sözel ve motor basmakalıp davranışlarını azaltmada kanıta-dayalı bir uygulama olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, Ş. Y., KAPLAN, G., KÖSE, H., ALTUN, D. E. (2022). The Effectiveness of Response Interruption and Redirection in Reducing Stereotypes: A Meta-Analysis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 838–857. https://ajindex.com/articles/531465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., Gardenier, N. C., Chung, B. I., & Dube, W. V. (2013). Persistence of stereotypic behavior: Examining the effects of external reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(4), 439-448. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-439 *Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., MacDonald, R. P., & Chung, B. I. (2007). Assessing and treating vocal stereotypy in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 40(2), 263-275. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.30-06 *Ahrens, E. N., Lerman, D. C., Kodak, T., Worsdell, A. S., & Keegan, C. (2011). Further evaluation of response interruption and redirection as treatment for stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 44(1), 95-108. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-95
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Aydın, O, Tekin-İftar, E., & Rakap, S. (2019). Bilimsel-dayanaklı uygulamaları belirlemede “tek-denekli-deneysel araştırmaların niteliksel göstergeleri” yönergesinin matematik becerileri öğretimi örneğinde ele alınışı. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 597 – 628. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.421952
  3. Banda, D. R., & Therrien, W. J. (2008). A teacher’s guide to meta-analysis. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(2), 66-71.
  4. Barton, E. E., Meadan, H., & Fettig, A. (2019). Comparison of visual analysis, non-overlap methods, and effect sizes in the evaluation of parent implemented functional assessment-based interventions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 85, 31-41. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.11.001 Boyd, B., & Wong, C. (2013). Response interruption/redirection (RIR) fact sheet. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brusa, E., & Richman, D. (2008). Developing stimulus control for occurrences of stereotypy exhibited by a child with autism. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 4(3), 264. doi:10.1037/h0100855 Carr, J. E., Dozier, C. L., Patel, M. R., Adams, A. N., & Martin, N. (2002). Treatment of automatically reinforced object mouthing with noncontingent reinforcement and response blocking: Experimental analysis and social validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23(1), 37-44. doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(01)00090-7
  5. Carr, M. E., Moore, D. W., & Anderson, A. (2014). Self-management interventions on s