SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Validity and Reliability for the Turkish Adaptation of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale

Öğretimde Bilinçli Farkındalık Ölçeği Türkçe Uyarlama Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Ahmet GENÇ
Özgür DEMİRCİ SEYREK
Cüneyd AYDIN
Pages
35–42
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To examine the criterion-related validity of the scale, its relationship with Maslach Burnout Inventory - Educators Survey (İnce and Şahin, 2015) was examined, and a significant relationship was found as expected (r= .45 -.42, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to adapt the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale (MTS) developed by Frank, Jennings and Greenberg (2016) into Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected with the scale from two different teacher groups of whom ages varied between 23 and 57 years old.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To examine the criterion-related validity of the scale, its relationship with Maslach Burnout Inventory - Educators Survey (İnce and Şahin, 2015) was examined, and a significant relationship was found as expected (r= .45 -.42, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale (MTS) developed by Frank, Jennings and Greenberg (2016) into Turkish. To this end, the scale items were first translated into Turkish and then translated back into English. Data were collected with the scale from two different teacher groups of whom ages varied between 23 and 57 years old. The confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) that were performed with the data obtained from the groups found the goodness-of-fit indices of the scale to be sufficient, and the two- factor structure of the scale was confirmed. To examine the criterion-related validity of the scale, its relationship with Maslach Burnout Inventory - Educators Survey (İnce and Şahin, 2015) was examined, and a significant relationship was found as expected (r= .45 -.42, p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Frank, Jennings ve Greenberg (2016) tarafından geliştirilen Öğretimde Bilinçli Farkındalık Ölçeği’ni (ÖBFÖ) Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Bu amaçla, ölçek maddeleri önce Türkçeye çevrilmiş ardından İngilizce’ye geri çeviri çalışması yapılmıştır. Elde edilen ölçekle yaşları 23-57 arasında değişen iki ayrı öğretmen grubundan veri toplanmıştır. Gruplardan elde edilen verilerle yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri (DFA) sonucunda ölçeğin uyum iyiliği değerleri yeterli bulunmuş ve ölçeğin iki boyutlu yapısı doğrulanmıştır. Ölçeğin ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliğini test etmek için Maslach Tükenmiş Envanteri – Eğitimci Formu (İnce ve Şahin, 2015) ile arasındaki ilişkiye bakılmış ve beklenildiği şekilde anlamlı düzeyde ilişkiler saptanmıştır (r = .45 -.42 aralığında, p

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, A., SEYREK, Ö. D., AYDIN, C. (2022). Validity and Reliability for the Turkish Adaptation of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 35–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/531460

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191-206.
  2. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological inquiry, 18(4), 211-237.
  3. Clipa, O. (2017). Teacher Stress and Coping Strategies. In O. Clipa (ed.), Studies and Current Trends in Science of Education (pp. 120-128).
  4. Suceava, Romania: LUMEN Proceedings. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LİSREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akadademi. Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Conley, K. M., Williamson, R. L., Henderson, T. G., & Mancini, V. S. (2019). Mindfulness-based training interventions for employees: A qualitative review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 156-178.
  6. Flook, L., Goldberg, S.B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K. & Davidson, R.J. (2013). Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain and Education, 7, 182-195.
  7. Frank, J.L., Jennings, P.A. & Greenberg, M.T. (2016). Validation of the mindfulness in teaching scale. Mindfulness, 7, 155-163.
  8. George, D. & Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Gouda, S., Luong, M. T., Schmidt, S., & Bauer, J. (2016). Students and teachers benefit from mindfulness-based stress reduction in a school-embedded pilot study. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 590. Hawkes, A. J., & Neale, C. M. (2020). Mindfulness beyond wellbeing: Emotion regulation and team member exchange in the workplace. Australian Journal of Psychology, 72(1), 20-30.
  9. Hülsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J. E. M., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J. W. B. (2012, December 31). Benefits of Mindfulness at Work: The Role of Mindfulness in Emotion Regulation, EmotionalExhaustion, and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0031313 İnce, N. B. ve Şahin, A. E. (2015). Maslach Tükenmişlik Envanteri - Eğitimci Formu’nu Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 6 (2), 385-399.
  10. Jennings, P. A. & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525.
  11. Jennings, P. A., Frank, J. L., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M