Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Response to Intervention: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

Müdahaleye Yanıt: Boylamsal Çalışmaların Bir Sistematik Derlemesi

Pages
403–423
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that the studies that are subject to the response to the intervention are conducted with groups with the risk of reading difficulty, and the response to interventions with the groups with the risk of mathematics difficulty and those with the risk of behavioral disorders are less.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Response to intervention is one of the most important educational reforms of the 20th century before directing students at risk group to special education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, it was conducted between January, 2004- December, 2017 and published in English.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that the studies that are subject to the response to the intervention are conducted with groups with the risk of reading difficulty, and the response to interventions with the groups with the risk of mathematics difficulty and those with the risk of behavioral disorders are less.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Response to intervention is one of the most important educational reforms of the 20th century before directing students at risk group to special education. In this study, applied studies carried out longitudinally within the scope of response to the intervention were reviewed. In this context, it was conducted between January, 2004- December, 2017 and published in English. Thirty longitudinal studies were examined in terms of various variables such as student characteristics, teaching contents, results and limitations in the risk group. The findings indicate that the studies that are subject to the response to the intervention are conducted with groups with the risk of reading difficulty, and the response to interventions with the groups with the risk of mathematics difficulty and those with the risk of behavioral disorders are less. As a result, it was revealed that the school success of the students in the risk group may increase with the direct special education, various teaching adaptations and arrangements and more intensive education when necessary, long-term practices are effective and there may be a decrease in the rates of directing the students in the risk group to special education. The findings were discussed by considering the literature. Several recommendations to support the viability of developing countries such as Turkey, the education system is presented.

Özet

Risk grubunda olan öğrencileri, özel eğitime yönlendirme öncesinde müdahaleye yanıt yaklaşımı, 20. yüzyılın en önemli eğitsel reformlarındandır. Bu çalışmada müdahaleye yanıt kapsamında boylamsal olarak yürütülmüş uygulamalı araştırmalar gözden geçirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda Ocak, 2004- Aralık, 2017 tarihleri arasında yürütülmüş ve İngilizce dilinde yayımlanmış otuz boylamsal araştırma, risk grubunda olan öğrenci özellikleri, öğretim içerikleri, sonuçlar ve sınırlılıklar gibi çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, müdahaleye yanıtı konu edinen araştırmaların daha çok okuma bozukluğu riski olan gruplara yönelik olduğunu, matematik bozukluğu riski ve davranış bozukluğu riski olan gruplara yönelik müdahale yanıt uygulamalarının ise daha az olduğu yönündedir. Sonuç olarak, doğrudan öğretim, çeşitli öğretim uyarlamaları ve düzenlemeler ve gerektiğinde daha yoğun öğretimle risk grubunda yer alan öğrencilerin okul başarısının artabileceği, uzun süreli uygulamaların etkili olduğu ve risk grubunda yer alan öğrencileri özel eğitime yönlendirme oranlarında düşüşlerin olabileceği ortaya konulmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular alanyazın dikkate alınarak tartışılmıştır. Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülke eğitim sistemlerinde uygulanabilirliğinin desteklenmesine yönelik çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

VURAN, S., AYDIN, O., UYSAL, H., ŞAHİN, V. (2022). Response to Intervention: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 403–423. https://ajindex.com/articles/531439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. ile işaretlenmiş kaynaklar analize dahil edilmişlerdir. *Albrecht, S. F., Mathur, S. R., Jones, R. E., & Alazemi, S. (2015). A school-wide three-tiered program of social skills intervention: Results of a three-year cohort study. Education And Treatment Of Children, 38(4), 565–586. *Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Chaparro, E. A., Smith, J. L. M., & Fien, H.(2015). Using regression discontinuity to test the impact of a tier 2 reading intervention in first grade. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(2), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.909548 *Beach, K. D., & E. O’Connor, R. E.(2015). Early response-to-intervention measures and criteria as predictors of reading disability in the beginning of third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413495451
  2. Brown, J. E., & Doolittle, J. (2008). A cultural, linguistic, and ecological framework for response to intervention with English language learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(5), 66-72.
  3. Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W.(2010). Response to intervention principles and strategies for effective practice. The Guilford Press.
  4. Bruhn, A. L., Lane, K. L., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). A review of tier 2 interventions conducted within multitiered models of behavioral prevention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613476092
  5. Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300406 *Case, L., Speece, D., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Montanaro, E., & Ritchey, K.(2014). İmmediate and long-term effects of tier 2 reading instruction for first-grade students with a high probability of reading failure. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.786771 *Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., Bridges, M. S., Liu, Y-S., & Bontempo, D. E.(2015). Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498115 *Catts, H. W., Nielsen, D. C., Bridges, M. S., & Liu, Y-S.(2016). Early identification of reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221941455612
  6. Choi, E., Yoon, S