SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6

ATA Method

Güçkan Yapar
Hanife Taylan Selamlar
Sedat Capar
İdil Yavuz
Pages
1838–1844
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using the results from the M3-competition, the forecasting performance of this method will be compared to not only these two major approaches but also to other successful methods derived from these two approaches with respect to simplicity and cost in addition to accuracy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the forecasting accuracy of a new forecasting method that is alternative to two major forecasting approaches: exponential smoothing (ES) and ARIMA, will be evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the forecasting accuracy of a new forecasting method that is alternative to two major forecasting approaches: exponential smoothing (ES) and ARIMA, will be evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using the results from the M3-competition, the forecasting performance of this method will be compared to not only these two major approaches but also to other successful methods derived from these two approaches with respect to simplicity and cost in addition to accuracy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Exponential smoothing · Forecasting · Initial value

Abstract

In this study, the forecasting accuracy of a new forecasting method that is alternative to two major forecasting approaches: exponential smoothing (ES) and ARIMA, will be evaluated. Using the results from the M3-competition, the forecasting performance of this method will be compared to not only these two major approaches but also to other successful methods derived from these two approaches with respect to simplicity and cost in addition to accuracy.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yapar, G., Selamlar, H. T., Capar, S., Yavuz, İ. (2022). ATA Method. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6, 1838–1844. https://ajindex.com/articles/530146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. S. Makridakis and M. Hibon, The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications, Int. J. Forecast, 16 (4), 451–476, 2000
  2. J. De Gooijer and R. Hyndman, 25 years of IIF time series forecasting: A selective review, Int. J. Forecast, 22 (3), 443–473, 2006
  3. P. Goodwin, The holt-winters approach to exponential smoothing: 50 years old and going strong, Foresight, 19, 30–33, 2010
  4. R. Hyndman, A. Koehler, R. Snyder and S. Grose, A state space framework for automatic forecasting using exponential smoothing methods, Int. J. Forecast, 13 (3), 439–454, 2002
  5. R. Hyndman, A. Koehler, J. Ord and R. Snyder, Forecasting with exponential smoothing: the state space approach, Springer-Verlag, 2008
  6. R. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, Forecasting: principles and practice, OTexts, 2014
  7. C. Pegels, On startup or learning curves: An expanded view, AIIE Transactions, 1 (3), 216–222, 1969
  8. E. Gardner Jr and E. McKenzie, Forecasting trends in time series, Management Science, 31 (10), 1237–1246, 1985
  9. S. Makridakis, A. Andersen, R. Carbone, R. Fildes, M. Hibon, R. Lewandowski, J. Newton, E. Parzen and R. Winkler, The forecasting accuracy of major time series methods, Wiley, 1984
  10. A. Koning, P. Franses, M. Hibon abd H. Stekler, The M3 competition: Statistical tests of the results, Int. J. Forecast, 21 (3), 397–409, 2005
  11. V. Assimakopoulos and K. Nikolopoulos, The theta model: a decomposition approach to forecasting, Int. J. Forecast, 16 (4), 521–430, 2000
  12. R. Hyndman and B. Billah, Unmasking the Theta method, Int. J. Forecast, 19 (2), 287–290, 2003
  13. J. Bates and C. Granger, The combination of forecasts, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 20 (4), 451–468, 1969
  14. R. Clemen, Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography, Int. J. Forecast, 5 (4), 559–583, 1989
  15. J. Armstrong, Combining forecasts: The end of the beginning or the beginning of the end?, Int. J. Forecast, 5 (4), 585–588, 1989
  16. J. Armstrong, Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001
  17. S. Makridakis and R. Winkler, Averages of forecasts: Some empirical results, Management Science, 29 (9), 987–996, 1983
  18. S. Makridakis, A. Andersen, R. Carbone, R. Fildes, M. Hibon, R. Lewandowski, J. Newton, E. Parzen and R. Winkler, The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition, J. Forecast., 1 (2), 111–153, 1982
  19. R. Cleveland