Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Colon-specific delivery of IgG from highly swellable dextran hydrogels: ın- vitro study

Pages
163–171
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The release of IgG from both hydrogels was substantially higher than that of similar systems especially in the presence of dextranase, which was attributed to the high swellability of the dextran hydrogels synthesized here.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Colonic drug delivery has gained increased importance for the delivery of peptide and protein drugs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the strategy is to investigate release of high molecular weight (MW) protein drugs from dextran-based hydrogels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The release of IgG from both hydrogels was substantially higher than that of similar systems especially in the presence of dextranase, which was attributed to the high swellability of the dextran hydrogels synthesized here.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Colonic drug delivery has gained increased importance for the delivery of peptide and protein drugs. In this study, the strategy is to investigate release of high molecular weight (MW) protein drugs from dextran-based hydrogels. The hydrogels were synthesized in the presence of crosslinking agents, N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide (MBAm) and epichlorohydrin (ECH). While dextran-MBAm hydrogels are having average equilibrium swelling ratios between 12.0 (at pH 2) and 14.0 (at pH 7), dextran-ECH hydrogels have values between 9.0 (at pH 2) and 12.5 (at pH 7). The model high molecular weight protein, immunoglobulin G (IgG), was loaded into the 50% (by weight) crosslinkercontaining dextran hydrogels by two ways, i.e. during the crosslinking reaction or by soaking method. The loading capacity was varied between 3.0 and 4.0 mg per g of dry gel by depending upon the loading procedure. In-vitro release experiments were performed in the simulated gastrointestinal system in the presence and absence of dextranase. The diffusion exponents were calculated by means of the semi-empirical power law equation indicated that IgG was mainly released by non-Fickian diffusion. The release of IgG from both hydrogels was substantially higher than that of similar systems especially in the presence of dextranase, which was attributed to the high swellability of the dextran hydrogels synthesized here.

🔖

Cite This Article

İMREN, D., GÜNER, A., GÜMÜŞDERELİOĞLU, M. (2022). Colon-specific delivery of IgG from highly swellable dextran hydrogels: ın- vitro study. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 163–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/529388

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. M.K. Chourasia and S.K. Jain, J. Pharm. Sci., 6 (2003) 33
  2. M.Z.I. Khan, Int. J. Pharm. Sci., 140 [1996) 131
  3. Y. Kimura, Y. Makita, T. Kumagi, T. Yamane, H. Kiato, H. Sasatani and S.I. Kim, Polymer., 33 (1992) 5294
  4. S. Sarasija and A. Hota, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 62 (2000) 1
  5. D. Swanson, B. Barclay, P.Wong and F. Theeuwes, Am. J. Med., 83 (1987) 3
  6. M. Saffran, G.S. Kumar, C. Savariar, J.C. Burnham, F. Williams and D.C. Neckers, Science, 233 (1986) 1081
  7. H. Brøndsted and J. Kopeček, Pharm. Res., 9 (1992) 1540
  8. C. Larsen, E. Harboe, M. Johansen and H.P. Olesen, Pharm. Res., 6 (1989) 995
  9. K.R. Kamath and K.Park, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 11 (1993) 59
  10. R.J.H. Stenekes, A.E. Loebis, C.M. Fernandes, D.J.A. Crommelin andW.E. Hennink, Pharm. Res., 17 (2000) 690
  11. L. Howgaard and H. Brøndsted, J. Control. Release. 36 (1995) 159
  12. A. Güner, Ö. Akman and Z.M.O. Rzaev, React. Funct. Polym., 47 (2001) 55
  13. D. İmren, M. Gümüşderelioğlu and A. Güner, Biochem. Eng. J., (2007) (submitted)
  14. A.K. Doğan, M. Gümüşderelioğlu and E. Aksöz, J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Part B:Appl Biomat., 74B 1 (2005) 504
  15. D. İmren, M. Gümüşderelioğlu and A. Güner, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 102 (2006) 4213
  16. H. Schoot, J. Macromol. Sci-Phys., 31B (1992) 1
  17. P.J. Flory and R. Rehner, J. Chem. Phys., 11 (1943) 521
  18. N.A. Peppas and E.W. Merril, J. Polym. Sci Polym. Chem., 14 (1976) 459
  19. E.W. Merril, K.A. Dennison and C. Sung, Biomaterials., 14 (1993) 1117
  20. V. Carelli, G. Di Colo, E. Nannipieri and M.F. Serafini, Int. J. Pharm., 55 (1989) 199
  21. L. Yang, C. Chu and J.A. Fix, Int. J. Pharm., 235 (2002) 1
  22. H.C. Chiu, A.T. Wu and Y.F. Lin, Polymer, 42 (2001) 1471
  23. W.E. Hennink, H. Talsma, J.C:H. Borchert, S.C. de Smedt and J. Demeester, J. Control. Release., 39 (1996) 47
  24. P.L. Ritger and N.A. Peppas, J. Control. Release, 5 (1987) 37.