Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Preconcentration of Fe(III) using Fe(III)-Ion imprinted polymeric traps and its analytical performance for FAAS

Pages
135–142
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Fe(III)-imprinted poly(MAAP-EGDMA) beads could be used many times without decreasing their adsorption capacities significantly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Novel Fe(III)-imprinted beads were prepared by molecular imprinting technique for selective solid-phase extraction (SPE) of Fe(III) ions prior to its determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:MAAP was synthesized using methacryloylchloride, 4-aminoantipyrine and pyridine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Fe(III)-imprinted poly(MAAP-EGDMA) beads could be used many times without decreasing their adsorption capacities significantly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Novel Fe(III)-imprinted beads were prepared by molecular imprinting technique for selective solid-phase extraction (SPE) of Fe(III) ions prior to its determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The functional metalcomplexing monomer and crosslinking monomer used were methacrylamidoantipyrine (MAAP) and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), respectively. MAAP was synthesized using methacryloylchloride, 4-aminoantipyrine and pyridine. Fe(III) ions were complexed with MAAP and the Fe(III)-imprinted poly(MAAP-EGDMA) beads were synthesized by suspension polymerization. After that, the template ions (i.e., Fe(III) ions) were removed using 4.0 M HNO3 solution. The specific surface area of the Fe(III)-imprinted and non-imprinted poly(MAAP-EGDMA) beads was found to be 1181.45 m2/g and 437.94 m2/g, respectively. The swelling ratio was 60% and 47% for imprinted and non-imprinted beads, respectively. According to the elemental analysis results, the beads contained 119.0 μmol MAAP/g polymer. The maximum adsorption capacity, optimum pH and equilibrium binding time were 29.32 mg/g, 4.0 and 80 min, respectively. Selectivity coefficients for Al(III), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Co(II) ions were compared with Fe(III) ion. Fe(III)-imprinted beads showed the following order of metal ion affinity: Fe(III)>Zn(II)>Cu(II)>Co(II)>Al(III). The Fe(III)-imprinted poly(MAAP-EGDMA) beads could be used many times without decreasing their adsorption capacities significantly.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABÖRK, M., ERSOZ, A., BİRLİK, E., SAY, R. (2022). Preconcentration of Fe(III) using Fe(III)-Ion imprinted polymeric traps and its analytical performance for FAAS. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 135–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/529364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. R.A. Goyer. Toxic effects of metals. In:Klaassen CD, ed. Casarett & Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 5th ed. New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1996, 715-716
  2. W.F.Greentree, J.O. Hall. Iron toxicosis. In: Bonagura JD, ed. Kirk’s current therapy XII small animal practice. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co, 1995, 240-242
  3. R.J. Williams. Biomineralization: Iron and the origins of life. Nature, 1990, 343, 213-214
  4. J. Albretsen., The toxicity of iron, an essential element, DVM, PhD, DABT, DABVT FEBRUARY 2006 Veterinary Medicine, 82-90
  5. R.B.Martin, Clin Chem., 1986, 32 (10) 1797–1806
  6. T.L. Litovitz., B.F. Schmitz., N. Matyunas., T.G.Martin. 1987 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers National Data Collection System. Am J Emerg Med., 1988, 6(5) 479–515 7. P. Kovacheva., R. Djingova, Anal.Chim. Acta, 2002, 464 (1), 7-13 8. L.Elçi., S. Saraçoğlu, Talanta, 1998, 1305-1310
  7. R.Shukla, G.N. Rao, Talanta, 2002, 57 (4), 633-639
  8. B.L.Gong, X. Li., F. Wang, X. Chang, Talanta, 2000, 52(2), 217–223
  9. X. Chang, X.Yang, X.Wei. and K.Wu., Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001, 450, 231-238
  10. X. Chang, Q. Su., D. Liang., X. Wei., B.Wang, Talanta, 2002, 57, 253–261
  11. A. Sanz-Mendel, M.D.F. Campa, E.B.Gonzalez, M.L. Fernadez-Sanchez, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1999, 54, 251–287
  12. A. Arpadjan., L. Vuchkova, E. Kostadinova, Analyst, 1997, 122, 243–246
  13. J. Ruzicka, A. Arndal, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1989, 216, 243-255
  14. S.J. Moyano, A. Gasquez., R. Olsina, E.Marchevsky, L.D. Martinez, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1999, 14, 259–262
  15. S.D. Çekiç., H. Filik., R. Apak., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 505, 15–24
  16. Y. Liu, X. Chang, S. Wang, Y. Guo, B. Din, S. Meng, Talanta, 2004, 64, 160–166
  17. Y. Guo, B. Din, Y. Liu, X. Chang, S. Meng, J.Liu, Talanta, 2004, 62, 207–213
  18. M.E, Mahmoud, M.M. Osman, M.E. Amer, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, 415, 33–40
  19. K.S. Abou-El-Sherbini, I.M.M., Kenawy, M.A. Ahmed, M.A. Issa, R. Elmorsi, Talanta, 2002, 58, 289 300
  20. A.R. Ghiasvand., R. Ghaderi, A. Kakanejadifard. Talanta, 2004, 62, 287–292
  21. O. Abollino, M. Aceto, C. Sarzanini, E. Mentasti, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, 411, 223–237
  22. A. Walcarius, M. Etienne, C. Delacote, Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 508, 87–98
  23. V. Gurnani, A.K. Singh, B. Venkataramani, Talanta, 2003, 61, 889–903
  24. P. Pohl, B. Prusisz, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 508, 83–90
  25. S. Q Pei, Z.L. Fang, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1994, 153, 185–193
  26. I. Narin, M. Soylak, L. Elci,