SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2004 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

3 years clinical evaluation of a fissure sealant application with and without under pressure

Basınç uygulanarak ve uygulanmadan yerleştirilen bir fissür koruyucunun 3 yıllık klinik değerlendirilmesi

Jale GÖRÜCÜ
Şükran BOLAY
Pages
24–28
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differences were statistically significant (X2=6.829, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Dental caries is often seen in pits and fissures of premolar and molar teeth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Application technique of fissure sealant is the major factor affected the retention of the material.In this study, the effectiveness of the application of pressure by an occlusal compressor on the retention, during the placement of fissure sealant was evaluated clinically at the end of the 3 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differences were statistically significant (X2=6.829, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Dental caries is often seen in pits and fissures of premolar and molar teeth. Fissure sealants are highly effective in preventing the caries in the pits and fissures. Lossing of the material total or partially due to the poor adaptation, caries would be developed in the fissures of teeth. Application technique of fissure sealant is the major factor affected the retention of the material.In this study, the effectiveness of the application of pressure by an occlusal compressor on the retention, during the placement of fissure sealant was evaluated clinically at the end of the 3 years. Material and Methods: This study was performed on 172 teeth of 43 dental students. 86 fissure sealants were applied under pressure and the other 86 without under pressure. At the end of three years, 136 fissure sealant at 34 students were examined. Results: Fissure sealant placed under pressure were superior than the sealants applied without under pressure. The differences were statistically significant (X2=6.829, p

Özet

Amaç: Diş çürüklerinin en sık görüldüğü bölgeler premolar ve molar dişlerin pit ve fissürleridir. Fissür koruyucular pit ve fissürlerde çürük oluşumunu engellemede oldukça etkindir. Materyalin kötü adapte edildiği, kısmen ya da tamamen düştüğü fissürlerde çürük oluşabilir. Fissür koruyucunun uygulama tekniği, tutuculuğu etkileyen en önemli faktörlerdendir.Bu galışmada, fissür koruyucunun yerleştirilmesi sırasında bir okluzal kompresor ile basınç uygulanmasının tutuculuğa olan etkisinin 3 yılın sonunda klinik olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem:çalışma, 43 dişhekimliği öğrencisinin 172 dişinde gerçekleştirildi. Koruyucuların 86 tanesi basınç altında, 86 tanesi de basınç uygulanmadan yerleştirildi. 3 yılın-sonunda 34 öğrencide 136 fissür koruyucu incelendi. Bulgular: Basınç altında yerleştirilen fissür koruyucuların tutuculuğu, basınç altında uygulanmayanlara oranla daha üstünn bulundu. Bu farklılık istatistiksel olarak da anlamlıydı. (X2=6.829, p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRÜCÜ, J., BOLAY, Ş. (2022). 3 years clinical evaluation of a fissure sealant application with and without under pressure. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 24–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/528580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Eklund SA. Ismail Al. Time of development of occlusal and proximal lesions: implications for fissure sealants. J Public Health Dent 1986; 46: 114-121
  2. Anusavice KJ. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago, Illinois, Quintessence Publishing Co 1989:255-272
  3. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853
  4. Dietz ER. Pit and fissure sealants. Dent Assist 198S; 57: 11-20
  5. Cueto EL, Buonocore MG. Sealing of pits and fissures with an adhesive resin: its use in caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 75: 121-128
  6. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Council on Dental Therapeutics. Pit and fissure sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 82: 1101-1103
  7. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ. Current status of sealant retention and caries prevention. Journal of Dental Education 1984; 4S(Supplement): 18-26
  8. Rock WP. The effectiveness of fissure sealant resins. Journal of Dental Education 1.984; 48(Suppiement):27- 31
  9. Bravo M, Osorio E, Garcia Al, Llodra JC, Boca P. The influence of dft index on sealant success: A 48 month survival analysis. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 768-774
  10. Boksman L, McConnel RJ, Carson B, McCuthreheon JEF. A 2 years clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed without the use of a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 131-135
  11. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealants after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122(11): 34-42
  12. Do Rego MA, De Aragujo MAM. A 2 year clinical evaluation of fluoride-containing pit and fissure sealants placed with an invasive technique. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 99-103
  13. McLean JW, Wilson AD. Fissure sealing and filling with an adhesive glass ionomer cement. Brit Dent J 1974; 136: 269-276
  14. Williams B, Winter GB. Fissure sealants. Brit Dent J 1981; 150: 183-1S7
  15. Smales RJ, Gorke DC. The use of glass ionomer cements for restoring occlusal tooth surfaces. Aust Dent J 1990; 35: 1S1-1S2
  16. Görücü J, Bolay Ş. Arıkan S. Basınç uygulanarak yerleştirilen bir fissür koruyucunun klinik olarak değerlendirilmesi (1 yıllık sonuçlar). Selçuk Üniv Dişhek Fak Derg 1997; 7(2):9-12
  17. Weintrgub JA. The effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants. J Public Health Dent 1989; 49(5 spec No): 317-330
  18. Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D. On the retention and effectiveness of fissure sealant in permanent molars after 15-20 years: a chort study Common Dent. Oral Epidemiol 2001; 29: 302-307