Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Palatinalde gömülü maksiller kanin dişin tünel traksiyon yöntemiyle tedavisi

The treatment of a palatally impacted maxillary canine by tunnel traction method

Pages
48–58
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The tunnel traction method is an advantageous treat¬ment technique in maxillary canine impaction cases with retained deciduous canine by providing a natural intraosseous tunnel toward the dental arch.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The patient was a 15-year-old boy who had an Angle Class I malocclusion with a right palatally impacted maxillary canine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The duration of the traction was 11 months and the total treatment time was 31 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The tunnel traction method is an advantageous treat¬ment technique in maxillary canine impaction cases with retained deciduous canine by providing a natural intraosseous tunnel toward the dental arch.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The patient was a 15-year-old boy who had an Angle Class I malocclusion with a right palatally impacted maxillary canine. The right deciduous canine was also persisted in the mouth. The treatment involved the tunnel traction method, by which the impacted canine was pulled toward the center of the alveolar ridge via the deciduous canine socket. The duration of the traction was 11 months and the total treatment time was 31 months. At the end of treatment, an apically repositioned flap operation was performed to correct the low gingival contour on the buccal side of the maxillary right canine to improve esthetics. The tunnel traction method is an advantageous treat¬ment technique in maxillary canine impaction cases with retained deciduous canine by providing a natural intraosseous tunnel toward the dental arch.

Özet

15 yaşındaki erkek hastada Angle Sınıf I maloı yona eşlik eden palatal olarak gömülü sağ maki kanin varlığı teşhis edildi. Sağ süt kaninin de ağ olduğu tespit edildi. Tedavisinde gömülü kanin nin süt dişi soketi içerisinden sürdürülmesini Sı yan tünel traksiyon yönteminin uygulanması j landı. Traksiyon 11 ay, toplam tedavi 31 ay si Tedavi sonunda, sürdürülen sağ maksiller k dişin labial dişeti bölgesine apikale repozisyone cerrahisi uygulanarak gingival konturu düzeltil daha estetik bir görüntü sağlandı. Tünel trakt metodu, süt dişlerinin varlığında, doğal .intraos tünel oluşturması bakımından gömülü mak kaninlerin tedavisinde avantajlı bir yaklaşımdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANER, U. T., AKSU, M. (2022). Palatinalde gömülü maksiller kanin dişin tünel traksiyon yöntemiyle tedavisi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 48–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/528476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:249-256
  2. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Sense and nonsense regarding palatal canines, Angle Orthod. 1995;65:99-102
  3. Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:159-171
  4. Bishara SE, Kommer DD, McNeil MH, Montagano LN, Oesterle LJ, Youngquist HW. Management of impacted canines. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:371-387
  5. Jacoby H. The etiology of maxillary canine impactions. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84:125-132
  6. Becker A, Smith P, Behar R. The incidence of anomalous maxillary lateral incisors in relation to palatally-displaced cuspids. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:24-29
  7. Levin MP, D'Amico RA. Flap design in exposing unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:419-422
  8. Vanarsdall RL, Corn H. Soft-tissue management of labially positioned unerupted teeth, Am J Orthod. 1977;72:53-64
  9. Wise RJ. Periodontal diagnosis and management of the impacted maxillary cuspid. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1981;l:56-73
  10. Boyd RL. Clinical assessment of injuries in orthodontic movement of impacted teeth. II. Surgical recommendations. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:407-418
  11. Kohavi D, Becker A, Zilberman Y. Surgical exposure, orthodontic movement, and final tooth position as factors in periodontal breakdown of treated palatally impacted canines. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:72-77
  12. Becker, A, Zilberman Y. A combined fixed-removable approach to the treatment of impacted maxillary canines. J Clin Orthod. 1975;9:162-169
  13. Von der Heydt K. The surgical uncovering and orthodontic positioning of unerupted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:256-276
  14. Jacoby H. The 'ballista spring" system for impacted teeth. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:143-151
  15. Fournier A, Turcotte JY, Bernard C. Orthodontic considerations in the treatment of maxillary impacted. canines. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:236-239
  16. McDonald F, Yap WL. The surgical exposure and application of direct traction of unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:331r340
  17. Boyd RL. Clinical assessment of injuries in orthodontic movement of impacted teeth. I. Methods of attachment. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:478-486
  18. Crescini A, Clauser C, Giorgetti R, Cortellini P, Pini Prato GP. Tunnel traction of infraosseous impacted maxillary canines. A three-year periodontal follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:61-72
  19. Becker A, Chaushu S. Success rate and duration of orthodontic tr