SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Ağız mukozasında ipek sütur materyalleri üzerinde plak birikimine %2’lik klorhekzidin glukonatın etkileri: scanning electron mikroskop çalışması

Effects of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate to the plaque accumulation on silk suture materials in oral mucosa: A scanning electron microscope study

Ali ERDEMİR
Selçuk AKTÜRK
Olgun ERDEMİR
Umut Saracoğlu TEKİN
Pages
12–18
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The amount of contamination was significantly lower in the test group (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine to the plaque accumulation on silk suture by scanning electron microscope (SEM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1st, the test group, used a % 0.2 chlorhexidine gluconate; Group 2nd, the control group, used saline after the impacted third molars extraction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The amount of contamination was significantly lower in the test group (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine to the plaque accumulation on silk suture by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Materials and Methods: The study included fourteen subjects. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1st, the test group, used a % 0.2 chlorhexidine gluconate; Group 2nd, the control group, used saline after the impacted third molars extraction. The sutures were removed after 7 days and kept in 70% alcohol and processed for SEM. The material was critical-point dried using dry ice method and observed in a field emission SEM at different magnifications. The contamination of the suture surfaces was scored and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. Results: There were obvious differences in the amount of plaque and debris accumulated between the test and the control groups. The amount of contamination was significantly lower in the test group (P

Özet

Amaç: Klorhekzidin glukonatın ipek sütur materyallerindeplak birikimi üzerine etkisini SEM ile değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 14 kişi katılmıştır.Hastalar rasgele iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Gömülü 3.molar operasyonundan sonra, birinci grup, testgrubu, % 0.2’lik klorhexidin glukonat kullandı; ikincigrup, kontrol grubu, serum fizyolojik kullandı. Süturmateryalleri 7 gün sonra alındı ve SEM işlemi için %70’lik alkolde saklandı. Materyal dry-ice yöntemi kullanılarakkritik noktada kurutuldu. Sütur yüzeylerininkontaminasyonu skorlandı ve istatistiksel analiz içinMann-Whitney U testi kullanıldı.Bulgular: Test ve kontrol grupları arasında plak vedebris miktarında belirgin farklılıklar olduğu gözlendi.Kontaminasyon miktarı, test grubunda belirgin şekildedaha azdı (P

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEMİR, A., AKTÜRK, S., ERDEMİR, O., TEKİN, U. S. (2022). Ağız mukozasında ipek sütur materyalleri üzerinde plak birikimine %2’lik klorhekzidin glukonatın etkileri: scanning electron mikroskop çalışması. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 12–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/528460

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Mandel ID. Chemotherapeutic agents for controlling plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1988; 15: 488–498
  2. Brecx M. Strategies and agents in supragingival chemical plaque control. Periodontol 2000 1997; 15: 100–108
  3. Hickel R. Wirkstoffe gegen Plaque und Bakterien. Quintessenz Bonusausgabe. 1997; 1:45–57
  4. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997; 15:55-62
  5. Gjermo P. Chlorhexidine in dental practice. J Clin Periodontol. 1974; 1(3):143-52
  6. Addy M. Chlorhexidine compared with other locally delivered antimicrobials. A short review. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13(10):957-64
  7. Addy M, Greenman J, Renton-Harper P, Newcombe R, Doherty F. Studies on stannous fluoride toothpaste and gel (2). Effects on salivary bacterial counts and plaque regrowth in vivo. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24(2):86-91
  8. Rosin M, Welk A, Kocher T, Majic-Todt A, Kramer A, Pitten FA. The effect of a polyhexamethylene biguanide mouthrinse compared to an essential oil rinse and a chlorhexidine rinse on bacterial counts and 4-day plaque re-growth. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29: 392-399
  9. Sreenivasan P, Gaffar A. Antiplaque biocides and bacterial resistance: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29: 965- 974
  10. Guggenheim B, Regolati B, Schmid R & Mühlemann HR. Effects of the topical application of mutanase on rat caries. Caries Res. 1980; 14: 128–135
  11. Lindquist B, Edward S, Torell P, Craspe B. Effect of different caries preventive measures in children highly infected with mutans streptococci. Scand J Dent Res. 1989; 97: 330-337
  12. Gendron R, Grenier D, Sorsa T, Mayrand D. Inhibition of the activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 8, and 9 by chlorhexidine. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999; 6:437– 439
  13. Rölla G & Melsen B. On the mechanism of plaque inhibition by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res (spec issue B). 1975; 54:57–62
  14. Jenkins S, Addy M & Wade W. The mechanism of action of chlorhexidine. A study of plaque growth on enamel inserts in vivo. J Clin Periodontol. 1988; 15: 415–424
  15. Selvig KA, Biagiotti GR, Leknes KN, Wikesjö UME. Oral tissue reactions to suture materials. IJPRD. 1998; 18: 475- 487
  16. Kim S. Endodontic microsurgery. In: Cohen S, Burns RE. Pathways of the pulp 8th ed. St Louis, MO, USA Mosby, 2002: 475
  17. Morrow SG, Rubinstein RA. Endodontic surgery. In: Ingle JI, Backland L. Endodontics. 5th ed. Ontario, Canada: B.C Decker; 2002: 709
  18. Wallace WR, Maxwell GR, Cavalaris CJ. Comparison of polyglycolic a