SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Üst molar dişlerin meziobukkal kök kanal morfolojilerinin klinink olarak incelenmesi

Canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars

Ersin ÖĞÜŞ
Mete ÜNGÖR
Emel Olga ÖNAY
Pages
2–9
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All levels of significance were set at p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the canal morphology and the percent of second mesiobuccal canals (MB2s) in conventionally treated and retreated maxillary first, second, and third molars that could be routinely located in different age groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Subjects and Method: The teeth examined were 202 first molars (83 men, 118 women; age range, 18-68 years), 129 second molars (60 men, 69 women; age range, 18-77 years), and 15 third molars (7 men, 8 women; age range, 30-61 years) treated over a 4-yr period of time by 1 endodontist.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All levels of significance were set at p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the canal morphology and the percent of second mesiobuccal canals (MB2s) in conventionally treated and retreated maxillary first, second, and third molars that could be routinely located in different age groups. Subjects and Method: The teeth examined were 202 first molars (83 men, 118 women; age range, 18-68 years), 129 second molars (60 men, 69 women; age range, 18-77 years), and 15 third molars (7 men, 8 women; age range, 30-61 years) treated over a 4-yr period of time by 1 endodontist. The results were recorded on a computer program and all the proportions were analyzed by using chi-square (likelihood ratio) test and two proportions z-test. All levels of significance were set at p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kök kanal tedavisi uygulanmış ve/veya kanal tedavisi tekrarlanmış farklı yaş gruplarındaki bireylere ait üst birinci, ikinci ve üçüncü molar dişlerde rutinde mevcut olabilecek ikinci meziobukkal kanalların (MB2s) kök kanal morfolojilerini ve klinikte görülme sıklıklarını incelemektir. Bireyler ve Yöntem: Kök kanal tedavisi uygulanmış dişlerin 202 adedi birinci molar (83 erkek, 118 kadın; yaş ortalaması, 18-68), 129 adedi ikinci molar (60 erkek, 69 kadın; yaş ortalaması, 18-77), 15 adedi üçüncü molar (7 erkek, 8 kadın; yaş ortalaması, 30-61) olup, bu dişlerin tedavileri bir endodontist tarafından 4 yıllık bir periyot boyunca gerçekleştirildi. Elde edilen veriler bir bilgisayar programına aktarıldı, ki-kare (likelihood ratio) testi ve oranların karşılaştırılması için z testi kullanılarak istatistiksel analiz gerçekleştirildi. Önemlilik düzeyi p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞÜŞ, E., ÜNGÖR, M., ÖNAY, E. O. (2022). Üst molar dişlerin meziobukkal kök kanal morfolojilerinin klinink olarak incelenmesi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 2–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/528413

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58: 589-99
  2. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg 1969; 28: 419-25
  3. Pomeranz HH, Fishelberg G. The secondary mesiobuccal canal of maxillary molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 88: 119-24
  4. Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod 1990; 16: 311-17
  5. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccal lingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 101-10
  6. Hess W, Zurcher E. The Anatomy of the Root Canals of the Teeth of the Permanent and Deciduous Dentitions. New York: William Wood & Co., 1925; 1-39
  7. Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 478-85
  8. Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999; 25: 446-50
  9. Sempira HN, Hartwell GR. Frequency of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars as determined by use of an operating microscope: a clinical study. J Endod 2000; 26: 673-4
  10. Calişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SS. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995; 21: 200-4
  11. Peikoff MD, Christie WH, Fogel HM. The maxillary second molar: variations in the number of roots and canals. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 365-9
  12. Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70: 638-43
  13. Neaverth EJ, Kotler LM, Kaltenbach RF. Clinical investigation (in vivo) of endodontically treated maxillary first molars. J Endod 1987; 13: 506-12
  14. Fogel HM, Peikoff MD, Christie WH. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: a clinical study. J Endod 1994; 20: 135-7
  15. Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1555-61
  16. Imura N, Hata GI, Toda T, Otani SM, Fagundes MI. Two canals in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 410-4
  17. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. St. Louis: CV Mosby,1989
  18. Gorduysus MO, Gord