Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

The influence of different testing devices on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to enamel

Kullanılan test araçlarının mikrogerilme bağlanma dayanımı ölçümlerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
94–102
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: There was no effect of the flat or notched testing devices used in microtensile bond strength test on the performance of Adper Scotchbond 1 XT and One Coat on enamel.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the effect of two different microtensile bond strength testing devices on the bond strength of adhesives to enamel.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Specimens with bonding surface area of 1.16±0.16 mm2 were prepared using an etch&rinse adhesive (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT) and a self-etch adhesive (One Coat) with a resin composite (Z100).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: There was no effect of the flat or notched testing devices used in microtensile bond strength test on the performance of Adper Scotchbond 1 XT and One Coat on enamel.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of two different microtensile bond strength testing devices on the bond strength of adhesives to enamel. Materials and Methods: Specimens with bonding surface area of 1.16±0.16 mm2 were prepared using an etch&rinse adhesive (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT) and a self-etch adhesive (One Coat) with a resin composite (Z100). The microtensile bond strengths of the specimens were measured using flat and notched testing devices (n=18). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups tested with either flat or notched testing devices with regard to enamel microtensile bond strength (two-way analysis of variance, p=0.726). The mixed type of failure was the most often seen failure pattern with both flat and notched testing devices used. Conclusions: There was no effect of the flat or notched testing devices used in microtensile bond strength test on the performance of Adper Scotchbond 1 XT and One Coat on enamel.

Özet

Amaç: Mikrogerilme bağlanma dayanımı testinde kullanılan iki farklı tipteki test araçlarının, adezivlerin minedeki bağlanma dayanımı üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: İki basamaklı asitlenen ve yıkanan bir adeziv (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT) ile iki basamaklı kendinden asitli bir adeziv (One Coat) ve kompozit rezin (Z100) kullanılarak, bağlanma yüzey alanı 1.16±0.16 mm2 olan örnekler hazırlandı. Elde edilen örneklerin mikrogerilme bağlanma dayanımları düz ve çentikli test araçları kullanılarak ölçüldü (n=18). Bulgular: Düz ve çentikli test aracı kullanılarak test edilen örneklerin minedeki bağlanma dayanımı değerleri arasında anlamlı bir fark saptanmadı (iki yönlü varyans analizi, p=0.726). Adeziv tipine bakılmaksızın, hem düz hem de çentikli test aracı kullanıldığında en çok gözlenen kopma tipinin karışık tip kopma olduğu belirlendi. Sonuçlar: Mikrogerilme bağlanma dayanımında kullanılan test aracı tiplerinin düz veya çentikli olması, Adper Scotchbond 1 XT ve One Coat’un minedeki performansını etkilemedi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERMİŞ, R. B. (2022). The influence of different testing devices on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to enamel. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 94–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/528410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship Between Surface Area for Adhesion and Tensile Bond Strength Evaluation of a Micro- Tensile Bond Test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240
  2. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The Influence of Cross-Sectional Shape and Surface Area on the Microtensile Bond Test. Dent Mater 1998;14:212-221
  3. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion Testing of Dentin Bonding Agents: A Review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-125
  4. Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, Soares CJ, Line SR. Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength to Enamel and Dentin of Human, Bovine, and Porcine Teeth. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:117-121
  5. Loguercio AD, Barroso LP, Grande RH, Reis A. Comparison of Intra- and Intertooth Resin-Dentin Bond Strength Variability. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:151-158
  6. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional Measurement of Resin-Dentin Bonding as an Array. J Dent Res 1999;78:699-705
  7. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of Dentin Depth and Cavity Configuration on Bond Strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898-905
  8. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The Effect of Dentine Location and Tubule Orientation on the Bond Strengths Between Resin and Dentine. J Dent 1999;27:265-274
  9. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Cardoso PEC. Influence of Substrate, Shape, and Thickness on Microtensile Specimens’ Structural Integrity and Their Measured Bond Strengths. Dent Mater 2004;20:643-654
  10. Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of Cross-Sectional Area on Resin-Enamel Tensile Bond Strength. Dent Mater 1997;13:290-296
  11. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of Cross- Sectional Surface Area on Bond Strengths Between Resin and Dentin. Dent Mater 1998;14:120-128
  12. El Zohairy AA, de Gee AJ, de Jager N, van Ruijven LJ, Feilzer AJ. The Influence of Specimen Attachment and Dimension on Microtensile Strength. J Dent Res 2004;83:420-424
  13. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of Three Specimen Fixation Modes on the Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of Adhesives to Dentin. Dent Mater J 2007;26:694-699
  14. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Critical Analysis of the Influence of Different Parameters on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Adhesives to Dentin. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:7-16