Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2009 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Position of fiber-reinforced composites in prosthetic applications

Fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozitlerin protetik uygulamalardaki yeri

Pages
49–60
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, properties of FRC, the position in prosthetic applications and the recent developments in this field have been criticized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the increasing application of fiber-reinforced composites (FRC) in dentistry, these materials gain popularity also in prosthetic applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The development of FRC offers new possibilities in minimally invasive treatment approaches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, properties of FRC, the position in prosthetic applications and the recent developments in this field have been criticized.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

With the increasing application of fiber-reinforced composites (FRC) in dentistry, these materials gain popularity also in prosthetic applications. The development of FRC offers new possibilities in minimally invasive treatment approaches. Furthermore, FRC resin restorations have the advantages of good aesthetics, translucency, ease of repair, and an ability to bond to the abutment teeth, thereby compensating for less-than-optimal abutment tooth retention and resistance form. These materials also have the potential for chair-side and laboratory fabrication. It is crucial for the clinicians to understand the basic structure of these materials and the different types available. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of FRC enables the clinician to select the best FRC material for certain clinical situation. In this review, properties of FRC, the position in prosthetic applications and the recent developments in this field have been criticized.

Özet

Fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozitlerin (FGK) diş hekimliğinde kullanımının giderek artması ile birlikte, bu materyaller protetik uygulamalarda da popülarite kazanmışlardır. FGK’lerin geliştirilmesi, minimal invaziv tedavi yaklaşımlarında yeni olanaklar sunmaktadır. Ayrıca, FGK rezin restorasyonların, iyi bir estetik, translusensi, tamir edilebilme kolaylığı, tutuculuk ve direnç formunu dengeleyen destek dişe bağlanabilme kabiliyeti gibi avantajları vardır. Bu materyaller aynı zamanda, hasta başında ve laboratuvarda yapılma imkânına sahiptir. Klinisyenlerin, bu materyallerin ve mevcut olan farklı tiplerinin temel yapısını anlaması çok önemlidir. FGK’lerin avantajlarının ve sınırlamalarının göz önünde bulundurulması, klinisyenlerin belirli klinik koşullar için en iyi FGK materyalini seçmesini mümkün kılacaktır. Bu derlemede, FGK’lerin özellikleri, protetik uygulamalardaki yeri ve bu alandaki gelişmeler değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAĞAŞ, Ç. I., UZUN, G. (2022). Position of fiber-reinforced composites in prosthetic applications. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 49–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/528374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Vallittu PK. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996;5:270-276. 2. van Heumen CC, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Lesaffre E, Creugers NH. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dent Mater 2008;24:1435-1443
  2. Isaac D. Engineering aspects of the structure and properties of polymer–fibre composites. editor. The First International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Plastics in Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry and Biomaterials Project, University of Turku, 1999:1–21
  3. Keulemans F, De Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Influence of retainer design on two-unit cantilever resinbonded glass fiber reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro and finite element analysis study. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:355-364
  4. Xie Q, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Comparison of loadbearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs. J Dent 2007;35:578-582
  5. Piovesan EM, Demarco FF, Piva E. Fiber-reinforced fixed partial dentures: a preliminary retrospective clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:100-104
  6. Naumann M, Reich S, Nothdurft FP, Beuer F, Schirrmeister JF, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fiber post restorations over 5 years. Am J Dent 2008;21:267-272
  7. Okamoto K, Ino T, Iwase N, Shimizu E, Suzuki M, Satoh G, Ohkawa S, Fujisawa M. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in composite resin cores with fiber posts of varying diameters. Dent Mater J 2008;27:49-55
  8. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:476-482
  9. Ladizesky NH, Ho CF, Chow TW. Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:934-939
  10. Ladizesky NH, Chow TW, Cheng YY. Denture base reinforcement using woven polyethylene fiber. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:307-314
  11. Ruyter IE, Ekstrand K, Bjork N. Development of carbon/ graphite fiber reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) suitable for implant-fixed dental bridges. Dent Mater 1986;2:6-9
  12. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Glass fiberreinforced abutments for dental implants. A pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:174-178
  13. Meiers JC, Kazemi RB, Donadio M. The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:388-393
  14. Garoushi S, Vallittu P