Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2009 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Ölçü maddelerinin farklı dezenfektan ajanlarla dezenfeksiyonunun In-Vivo olarak değerlendirilmesi

In-Vivo evaluation of impression material disinfection with different disinfectant agents

Pages
52–59
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: It is concluded that 3 min. application of either with 7.5% PI or 1% SH was found sufficient for disinfecting impressions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the time dependent effects of disinfection agents on impression materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 20 children having prosthetic treatment needs participated in the study. 3 dental impressions with 30 min. intervals were taken from each patient with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: It is concluded that 3 min. application of either with 7.5% PI or 1% SH was found sufficient for disinfecting impressions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the time dependent effects of disinfection agents on impression materials. Materials and Methods: 20 children having prosthetic treatment needs participated in the study. 3 dental impressions with 30 min. intervals were taken from each patient with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression. Disinfection agents (7,5% Povidone Iodine (PI), 1% Sodium Hypochloride (SH)) were applied for 3 or 10 min. time schedules. The first impressions (control) were rinsed with 250 cc distilled water. The second impressions (1st group, n=20) were evaluated for 3 min. application time, randomly divided into two groups (n=10) according to disinfectant agents used. The third impressions (2nd group, n=20) disinfected for 10 min. with the same protocol. The microbiological samples were taken and colony forming units were counted. Results: In the control group Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci, Corynebacterium Diphteriae, Neisseria, α-Hemolytic Streptococci, Non-Hemolytic Streptococci and Bacillus spieces were detected. However negative cultures were taken from both 7.5% PI and 1% SH groups in 3 and 10 minutes time schedules. Conclusions: It is concluded that 3 min. application of either with 7.5% PI or 1% SH was found sufficient for disinfecting impressions.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ölçü malzemeleri üzerinde dezenfeksiyon ajanlarının zamana bağlı etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Gereçler ve Yöntemler: Protetik tedavi ihtiyacı olan 20 çocuk araştırmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Her hastadan 30 dak. aralıklarla irreversible bir hidrokolloid ölçü materyali ile 3 adet diş ölçüsü alınmıştır. Dezenfeksiyon ajanları (%7,5 Povidon İyot (PI), %1 Sodyum Hipoklorid (SH)) 3 ya da 10 dakikalık zaman çizelgelerinde uygulanmıştır. İlk ölçüler (kontrol) 250 cc, distile su ile yıkanmıştır. İkinci ölçüler (1. grup, n=20) 3 dak. uygulama zamanında, dezenfektan maddelerin kullanımına göre rastgele iki gruba (n = 10) ayrılmıştır. Üçüncü ölçüler (2. grup n=20) aynı protokolle10 dak dezenfekte edilmiştir. Mikrobiyolojik örnekler alınarak koloni oluşturan birimler sayısal olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Kontrol grubunda Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci, Corynebacterium Diphteriae, Neisseria, α-Hemolytic Streptococci, Non-Hemolytic Streptococci ve Bacillus türleri saptandı. Öte yandan 3 ve 10 dakikalık zaman çizelgelerinde uygulanan % 7.5 PI ve % 1 SH gruplarında negatif kültürler elde edildi. Sonuçlar: Üç dakıkalık % 7,5 PI ve %1 SH uygulamalarının ölçü maddelerinin dezenfeksiyonunda başarılı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAÇAM, A., ATABEK, D., POLAT, S., SİPAHİ, A. B., TÜZÜNER, E. (2022). Ölçü maddelerinin farklı dezenfektan ajanlarla dezenfeksiyonunun In-Vivo olarak değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 52–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/528345

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. BDA Advisory Service. The control of cross-infection in dentistry. Br Dent Assoc Advice Sheet 1991; A12
  2. Palenik CJ, Burke FJ, Miller CH. Strategies for dental clinic infection control. Dent Update 2000; 27: 7-15
  3. Silva SMLM, Salvador MCG. Effect of Disinfection Technique on the Linear Dimensional Stability of Dental Impression Materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12: 244-249
  4. Russell JN, Michael GN 1988 Oral Microbiology and Immunology. Saunders company. USA, pp.120-127
  5. Yumul Ç, Bilgin Z, GÜRSOY GÇ. The prevalence of Candida Albicans, Staphylococcus Aereus, Eschrichia Coli and Coliform Bacteroides in the Oropharynx of 4-15 aged children. Ankara University Press 1993;19: 297-299
  6. Centres for Disease Control and prevention: Recommended infection-control practices for dentistry. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rpt 1993:42:1-2
  7. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA council on Dental Practice: Infection control recommendations for the dental office and dental laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 672-680
  8. Leung RL, Schonfeld SE. Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross-contamination. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 210-211
  9. Kugel G, Perry RD, Ferrari M, Lalıcata P. Disinfection And Communication Practices: A survey of U.S. Dental Laboratories. JADA 2000; 131: 786-792
  10. Yılmaz H, Aydın C, Gull B, Yılmaz C, Semiz M. Effect of disinfection on the Dimensional Stability of Polyether Impression Materials. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 473-479
  11. Lu JX, Zhang FM, Chen YM, Qian M. The effect of disinfection on dimension stability of impressions. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2004; 13: 290-292
  12. Mathyas J, Dao N, Caputo AA, Lucatorto FM. Effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 25-31
  13. Dellinger EL, Williams KJ, Seteao JC. Influence of immersion and spray disinfectants on alginate impressions. J Dent Res 1990; 69(special issue):364
  14. Abdelaziz KM, Hassan AM, Hodges JS. Reproducibility of Sterilized Rubber Impressions. Braz Dent J 2004; 15: 209-213
  15. Boden J, Likeman M, Clark R. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental Stone. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2001; 9: 131-5
  16. Porta SRS, Gomes VL, Pavanin LA, Soza CCB. Analysis of Three Disinfectants after Immersion of Irreversible Hydrocolloid and ZOE paste impressions. Br J Oral Sci 2006; 5: 1094-1100
  17. Blair FM, Wassell W. A Survey of The Methods Of Disinfection Of De