SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 16

THE IMPACT OF PERSONALITY AND LOCUS OF CONTROL ON THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL

KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN VE KONTROL ODAĞININ PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE

Mehmet DENİZ
Haluk ERDEM
Gökdeniz KALKIN
Pages
26–43
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Obtained findings will be discussed with the studies in the literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed at exploring the impact of personality and locus of control on psychological capital which can be modified and improved in character.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Information gathered through survey of candidate public auditors (n=158) was analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Obtained findings will be discussed with the studies in the literature
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed at exploring the impact of personality and locus of control on psychological capital which can be modified and improved in character. Information gathered through survey of candidate public auditors (n=158) was analyzed. In the and it was revealed that out of five big influential traits three of them, responsibility, opennes to experience and extraversion are the ones which positively and meaningfully affect psychological capital. It is found out that there is no meaningfull relation between psychological capital and emotional stability and compatibility. Besides it is found out that internal locus of control positively and meaningfully influence psychological capital. Obtained findings will be discussed with the studies in the literature

Özet

Bu araştırmada klasik sermaye faktörlerinden farklı olarak değiştirilebilir ve geliştirilebilir bir özellik arz eden psikolojik sermaye üzerinde kişilik özelliklerinin ve iç kontrol odağının etkisini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. İç Denetim ve Koordinasyon Kurulunun organize ettiği iç denetçi sertifika eğitimine katılan kamu iç denetçi adaylarından (n=158) anket yöntemiyle toplanan verilerin analiz edilmesi neticesinde beş büyük kişilik özelliğinden sorumluluk, deneyimlere açıklık ve dışadönüklük kişilik yapılarının psikolojik sermayeyi pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği görülmüştür. Uyumluluk ve duygusal denge ile psikolojik sermaye arasında ise anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca iç kontrol odaklılığın psikolojik sermayeyi pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZ, M., ERDEM, H., KALKIN, G. (2022). THE IMPACT OF PERSONALITY AND LOCUS OF CONTROL ON THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 16, 26–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/527734

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abu Elanain, Hossam M. (2010), “Work Locus of Control and Interactional Justice As Mediators of the Relationship Between Openness to Experience and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17 (2), pp.170-192.
  2. Akçay, Vildan H. (2011), “Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye Kavramı ve İşletmelerde Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Üstünlüğünü Sağlamadaki Rolü”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (1), ss.73-98.
  3. Aliyev, Ramin - Mehmet Karakus (2015), “The Effects of Positive Psychological Capital and Negative Feelings on Students’ Violence Tendency”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, pp.69-76. Aubé, Caroline - Vincent Rousseau - Estelle M. Morin, (2007), “Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22 (5), pp.479-495.
  4. Avey, James B - Fred Luthans - Carolyn M. Youssef (2010), “The Additive Value of Positive Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes and Behaviors”, Journal of Management, 36, pp. 430-452.
  5. Avey, James B. - Rebecca J. Reichard – Fred Luthans – Ketan H. Mhatre (2011), “Meta‐Analysis of The İmpact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22 (2), pp.127-152.
  6. Avey, James B.- Fred Luthans - Susan M. Jensen (2009), “Psychological Capital: A Positive Resource for Combating Employee Stress and Turnover”, Human Resource Management, 48 (5), pp.677-693.
  7. Basım, H. Nejat - Harun Şeşen (2008), “Çalışanların Kontrol Odaklarının Örgüt İçi Girişimcilik Tutumları İle İlişkisi: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 63 (3), ss.49-64.
  8. Benet-Martinez, Veronica – Oliver P. John (1998), “Los Cinco Grades Across Cultures and Ethnic Groups: Multitrait Multimethod Analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp.729-750.
  9. Bernstein, Douglas – Alison C. Stewart – Edward Roy – Thomas K. Srull – Christopher D. Wickens (1994),
  10. Psychology, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Bertolini, Michelle S. - Julia L. Higgs - Karen L. Hooks (2011), “Multıdimensional Locus of Control Applied to the Taxpayer/Tax Professional Relationship”, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 14, pp.1-35.
  11. Bülbül, Hasan - Ömür Demirer (2008), “Hizmet Kalitesi Ölçüm Modelleri Servqual ve Serperf’in Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, ss.181- 198. Cleveland, Mark