Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Analysing of clinical-demographic characteristics in patients of myocardial infarction

Miyokard infarktüslü hastaların klinik ve demografik özelliklerinin incelenmesi

Pages
22–25
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, the community should be appropriately informed to allow the early admission to the hospital

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The study was aimed to examine clinical and demographic characteristics, therapeutic interventions, complications, in-hospital mortality of 92 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction between January 2003-December 2003 in Coronary Intensive Care Unit of Istanbul Education Research Hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Records of 92 patients were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, the community should be appropriately informed to allow the early admission to the hospital
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The study was aimed to examine clinical and demographic characteristics, therapeutic interventions, complications, in-hospital mortality of 92 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction between January 2003-December 2003 in Coronary Intensive Care Unit of Istanbul Education Research Hospital. Material and Methods: Records of 92 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Mean age of 92 patients was 58.1±10.14 years. Seventy-three (79.3 %) of the patients were male and 19 (20.6 %) were female. Non-ST elevation myocard infarction was found in 8 (9 %) patients and ST-elevation myocard infarction in 84 (91 %). Seventeen patients (18.4 %) died at admission, with 11 of them (64.7 %) dying within 24 hours and 6 dying later than the first 24 hours. In-hospital mortality was higher among those elder than 65 years old (P=0.01). Forty one (4 %) patients received thrombolytic treatment and 51 (65 %) did not due to reaching to the hospital lately or several counter indication. In-hospital mortality rate is significantly lower in patients receiving thrombolitic (p=0.045). Seventy-five patients were discharged, with a recommendation of cardiologic outpatient follow-up. Conclusion: Although cardiovascular death is the most common cause of death, a few centers in our country are able to perform interventions in acute coronary syndromes. This increases the importance of centers performing thrombolytic treatment such as our one. In the current study, a substantial proportion of patients did not receive thrombolytic treatment due to delayed admission to the hospital. Although no significant difference existed between groups receiving and not receiving thrombolytic treatment in our center, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower among those receiving thrombolytic treatment. Hence, the community should be appropriately informed to allow the early admission to the hospital

Özet

Amaç: İstanbul Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi Koroner Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Ocak 2003-Aralık 2003 arasında Akut miyokard infarktüsü tanısıyla yatırılarak tedavi edilen 92 hastanın klinik, demografik özellikleri, uygulanan tedaviler, komplikasyonlar ve hastane içi mortalite oranlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 92 hastanın kayıtları geriye dönük incelendi. Bulgular: 92 hastanın yaş ortalaması 58.1±10.14 idi. Hastaların 73 (% 79.3)‘ü erkek, 19 (% 20.6)’u bayan idi. 8 (% 9) hastada ST elevasyonsuz miyokard infarktüsü, 84 (% 91) hastada ST elevasyonlu miyokard infarktüsü tespit edildi. 17 (% 18.4) hastada yatışı sırasında ölüm gerçekleşmiş, bunların 11 (% 64.7)’i ilk 24 saatte, 6 (% 35.3) taneside 24 saatten sonra gerçekleşmiştir. Hastane için mortalite 65 yaş üstünde daha fazladır (p=0,01). 41 hastaya (% 45) trombolitik tedavi uygulanmış, 51 (% 65)’ine hastaneye geç ulaşmaları yada kontrendikasyon bulunması nedeniyle trombolitik uygulanmamıştır. Trombolitik uygulanan hastalarda mortalite anlamlı derecede düşüktür (p:0.045). 75 hasta kardiyoloji poliklinik kontrolü önerilerek taburcu edilmiştir. Sonuç: Kardiyovasküler ölümler mortalitenin en sık sebebi olmasına karşın, ülkemizde akut koroner sendromlarda girişim yapabilecek merkez sayısı azdır. Bu durum merkezimiz gibi trombolitik tedavi yapan merkezlerin önemini arttırmaktadır. Çalışmamızda hastaların önemli bir kısmına hastaneye geç başvurmaları nedeniyle trombolitik uygulanamamıştır. Hastane içi mortalite trombolitik uygulananlarda anlamlı derecede düşüktür. Bu nedenle toplumun doğru bilgilendirilerek hastaneye erken başvurulması sağlanmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLANTAŞ, M. K., ÖNER, A. F., ERGÜNEY, M., YURDAKUL, S., TÜRKEŞ, Ş., GÜRCAN, Z. (2022). Analysing of clinical-demographic characteristics in patients of myocardial infarction. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 22–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/526201

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Schroeder SA. The importance of relating medicine and public health. Am J Med Sci 1992;303:355
  2. Yip Lık, Wu CJ, Chang TW, et al. Comparison of primary anjioplasty and conservative treatment on short and long term outcomes in octogenarion or older patients with adult myocardial infarction. Jpn Heart J 2002;43:463-74
  3. Alter DA, Naylor CD, Austion PC, TU JV. Biology or bias: practice patterns and long term outcomes for men and women with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1909-16
  4. TÜMAR çalışmaları. Türkiye Akut Myokard İnfarktüsü Araştırması İstanbul: Bristol Mayers Squibb Inc. Şirketi Yayınları 2002
  5. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction:1515-2, ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) collaborate Group. Lancet 1988;2:349-60
  6. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. American Collage of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; ACC/ AHA/ SCAI Writing committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary intervention
  7. Lange RA, Hillis LD. Should thrombolysis or primary anjioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction. H Eng J Med 1996;335:1311-7
  8. Arat N, Gulel N, Sabah I. Has the mortality rate from acute myocardial infarction fallen substantially in recent years? Single Center data on elderly patient population. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2005;S:1001-7
  9. Norgaz T, Hobikoğlu G, Aksu H, et al. ST yükselmeli akut myocard infarktüsünde hastane öncesi gecikme süresiyle klinik, demografik ve sosyoekonomik etkenlerin ilişkisi: Hasta eğitimi önemi Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2005;33:392-7
  10. Von de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST segment elevation. The task force on the management of acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003;24:28-66
  11. Arıtman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task force on Practice Guidelines. (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guıdelines for the managements of patients with acute myocard infarction) J Am Coll Cardiol 44:E1-E211, 2004.