Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Uterin anomalisi olan term gebelikte servikal prolapsus: Olgu sunumu

Cervical prolapse and concomitant uterine anomaly at term pregnancy: A case report

Pages
153–156
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

She was discharged on the postoperative 4. day withoutany complication, and partial resolution of the cervical pro-lapse.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Uterine anomalies and cervical prolapse in pregnancy are tworare clinical conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 39-year old pregnant woman admit-ted to the hospital with premature rupture of the membransduring labor at 38 weeks of gestation and a concomitantmaternal mullerien duct anomaly and cervical prolapse.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:She was discharged on the postoperative 4. day withoutany complication, and partial resolution of the cervical pro-lapse.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Uterine anomalies and cervical prolapse in pregnancy are tworare clinical conditions. A 39-year old pregnant woman admit-ted to the hospital with premature rupture of the membransduring labor at 38 weeks of gestation and a concomitantmaternal mullerien duct anomaly and cervical prolapse. Wedetermined an edematous, partially ulcerated and hardly redu-cing cervix on pelvic examination. Sonographic examinationrevealed an enlarged uterus carriying the fetoplasental unitsin the left compartment and the right compartment of the ute-rus seemed like an heterogenous mass. Because of cervicalprolapse and onset of bleeding, cesarean section was perfor-med. She was discharged on the postoperative 4. day withoutany complication, and partial resolution of the cervical pro-lapse.

Özet

Gebelikte servikal prolapsus ve uterus anomalisi nadir görüleniki klinik durumdur. Servikal prolapsusu ve müllerien kanalanomalisi olan 39 yaşındaki hasta erken membran rüptürünedeniyle hastanemize 38. gebelik haftasında başvurdu. Pelvikmuayenede ödemli, parsiyel olarak ülsere olan ve redüksüyonutam olmayan serviks saptandı. Ultrasonografik incelemede soltarafında gebelik ürünlerini taşıyan sol tarafı ise heterojenkitle gibi görünen büyümüş bir uterus izlendi. Servikal prolap- sus varlığı ve vajinal kanama saptanması nedeniyle sezeryanplanlandı. Postop 4. gününde parsiyel servikal rezolüsyonuolan hasta komplikasyonsuz olarak taburcu edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZDAĞ, H., SÜER, N., GÜNDÜZ, G., ÇEKMEZ, Y. (2022). Uterin anomalisi olan term gebelikte servikal prolapsus: Olgu sunumu. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 153–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/526038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Keettel W. Prolapse of the uterus during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941;42:121-6
  2. Simon C, Martinez L, Pardo F, et al. Mullerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril Dec 1991;56(6):1192-3. PMid:1743344 3. Ioannis E, Messinis, MD. Abridged obstetrics and gyneco- logy. Communications, copyright 2005. Page 441
  3. Partsinevelos GA, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Ant- saklis A. Uterine prolapse in pregnancy: a rare condition an obstetrician should be familiar with. Fetal Diagn Ther http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000158521 PMid:18818503 5. Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Boreham MK. Etiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005;48:639-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.grf.0000170428.45819.4e PMid:16012231 6. Guariglia L, Carducci B, Botta A, Ferrazzani S, Caruso A. Uterine prolapse in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2005;60:192-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000087069 PMid:16020934 7. Vigilante M, Behrsinger FR. Uterine prolapse at term. Obstet Gynecol 1956;8:284-286. PMid:13358999 8. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004;233(1):19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331020777 PMid:15317956 9. Acién P, Acién M, Sánchez-Ferrer ML. Müllerian anoma- lies “without a classification”: from the didelphys-unicollis uterus to the bicervical uterus with or without septate vagi- na. Fertil Steril 2009;91(6):2369-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.079 PMid:18367185 10. Shulman LP. Müllerian anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008;51(2):214-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816feba0 PMid:18463453 11. AFS. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusi- on secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mul- lerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49(6):944-55. PMid:3371491 12. Cingillioğlu B, Kulhan M, Yıldırım Y. Extensive uterine prolapsed during active labor: a case report. Int Urogynecol J 2010;1433-4. PMid:20422152 13. Daskalasis G, Lymberopoulos E, Anastasakis E, Kalman- tis K, Athanasaki A, Antsaklis A. Uterine Prolapse Comp- licating Pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:391-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0354-0 PMid:17406876 14. Meydanlı MM, UstunY, Yalçın OT. Pelvic organ prolap- se complicating third trimester pregnancy. A case report. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006;61:133-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000090034 PMid:16319489 15. Sawyer D, Frey K. Cervical prolaps