Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Effectiveness of Nasal and Temporal Limbal Incisions in Phacoemulsifi cation: A Comparative Study

Pages
42–46
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Better cylindrical diopter values were observed in the nasal incision in patients with an AL of

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Cataract is the most common cause of vision disorders and blindness worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 771 eyes of 514 patients (298 males, 58%; 216 females, 42%) were operated and data of 746 eyes (383 right eyes, 51.3%; 363 left eyes, 48.7%) were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Better cylindrical diopter values were observed in the nasal incision in patients with an AL of
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Cataract is the most common cause of vision disorders and blindness worldwide. Phacoemulsifi cation is widely performed in the treatment of cataract; however, surgery-induced astigmatism is a major concern in this treatment. Selection of incision site is effective to improve outcomes. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of nasal and temporal limbal incisions on post-operative outcomes in phacoemulsifi cation. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 771 eyes of 514 patients (298 males, 58%; 216 females, 42%) were operated and data of 746 eyes (383 right eyes, 51.3%; 363 left eyes, 48.7%) were analyzed. Nasal and temporal limbal incisions were performed in the left and right eyes, respectively. Pre-operative keratometry (fl at and steep keratometry), axial length (AL), and intraocular lens power measurements as well as post-operative (1 month after the operation) keratometry and auto refractometry measurements were performed both for the right and left eyes of the patients. Results: The percentage changes in the keratometric measurements were higher in the nasal incision . Emmetropia was more achieved in the temporal incision in patients with an AL of 24 mm) AL. Better cylindrical diopter values were observed in the nasal incision in patients with an AL of

🔖

Cite This Article

BALSAK, S., DAG, U. (2022). Effectiveness of Nasal and Temporal Limbal Incisions in Phacoemulsifi cation: A Comparative Study. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 42–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/525723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:614-8
  2. Gogate P, Optom JJ, Deshpande S, et al. Meta-analysis to compare the safety and effi cacy of manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsifi cation. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22:362-9
  3. Venkatesh R, Tan CS, Sengupta S, et al. Phacoemulsifi cation versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for white cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1849-54
  4. Ren Y, Fang X, Fang A, et al. Phacoemulsifi cation with 3.0 and 2.0 mm opposite clear corneal incisions for correction of corneal astigmatism. Cornea. 2019; 38: 1105-1110
  5. Jin C, Chen X, Law A, et al. Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsifi cation in age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD010510
  6. Kessel L, Andresen J, Tendal B, et al. Toricin traocular lenses in the correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:275-86
  7. Monaco G, Scialdone A. Long-term outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery: aberrometric analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1581-7
  8. Nemeth G, Kolozsvari B, Berta A, et al. Paired opposite clear corneal incision: time-related changes of its effect and factors on which those changes depend. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24:676- 81
  9. Balsak S, Yıldız Ekinci D. Effect of combined phacotrabeculectomy on the anterior segment parameters Glo- Kat2020;15:45-50
  10. Eslami Y, Mirmohammadsadeghi A. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism between horizontal and X-pattern sutures in the scleral tunnel incisions for manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:606-10
  11. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Soroush S, et al. The location of incision in cataract surgery and its impact on induced astigmatism. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:58-64
  12. Mallik VK, Kumar S, Kamboj R, et al. Comparison of astigmatism following manual small incision cataract surgery: superior versus temporal approach. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012;4:54-8
  13. Lyhne N, Krogsager J, Corydon L, et al. One year follow-up of astigmatism after 4.0 mm temporal clear corneal and superior scleral incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:83-7
  14. Ermiş SS, Inan UU, Ozturk F. Surgically induced astigmatism after superotemporal and superonasal clear corneal incisions in phacoemulsifi cation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1316-9
  15. Kohnen S, Neuber R, Kohnen T. Effect of tempor