Journals / Geriatri / 2003 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients aged 60 years and older

60 yaş ve üzerindeki hastalarda perkütan nefrolitotomi

Journal
Geriatri
Pages
47–50
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective method of stone treatment in the elderly, even if they have a solitary kidney or complex calculi.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study our aim is to evaluate the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) performed in patients aged 60 years and older.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Retrospective review of 97 PNL procedures performed on 50 female and 42 male patients aged 60 years and older (mean 64,8) was compared with the data of the remaining 595 PNL procedures performed on younger patients in our clinic between December 1997- October 2002.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective method of stone treatment in the elderly, even if they have a solitary kidney or complex calculi.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study our aim is to evaluate the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) performed in patients aged 60 years and older. Retrospective review of 97 PNL procedures performed on 50 female and 42 male patients aged 60 years and older (mean 64,8) was compared with the data of the remaining 595 PNL procedures performed on younger patients in our clinic between December 1997- October 2002. The presence of complete staghorn calculi (17/97, 18 % v 105/595, 18 %; p= 0.577) and average stone size (623 mm2 versus 739 mm2, p > 0.05) were similar for two groups. Transfusion was necessary in 19 of 97 renal units (20 %) of older patients, and in 118 of 595 renalunit (20 %) of younger patients (p= 0.955). However the presence of solitary functioning kidney seem to be higher in the elderly group (10 % v 7 %), there was no statistical difference between two groups (p= 0,841). The success rates (stone-free patients and patients with residual stones 0.05). No significant complication was observed in this elderly group. The stone-free rate in the elderly group was similar to that obtained in the younger patients, without any higher rates of complications or blood transfusions. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective method of stone treatment in the elderly, even if they have a solitary kidney or complex calculi.

Özet

Bu çalışmadaki amacımız, altmış yaş ve üzerindeki üriner sistem taş hastalarında kliniğimizde uygulanan perkütan nefrolitotomi' ye (PNL) ilişkin sonuçların değerlendirilmesidir. Aralık 1997 ile Ekim 2002 tarihleri arasında 60 yaş ve üzerinde olan (ortalama 64,8) 50 kadın, 42 erkekte toplam 97 renal üniteye uygulanan PNL ile ilgili veriler aynı dönemde genç hasta grubunda uygulanan 595 PNL verileri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Gruplar arasında staghorn taş yüzdesi (17/97, % 18 ve 105/595, % 18; p= 0.577) ve ortalama taş alanı (623 mm2, 739 mm2; p> 0.05) açısından anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır. Gruplar kan transfüzyonu yapılma oranları açısından da benzer bulunmuştur (19/97, % 20 ve 118/595, % 20; p= 0.955). Yaşlı grupta soliter böbrek oranı daha yüksek görünse de (% 10 v % 7), istatistiksel farklılık bulunamamıştır (p= 0.841). Başarı oranları (4 mm'den küçük rezidiv taşlar da önemsiz kabul edildiğinde) yaşlı grupta % 95, genç grupta ise % 96 olarak belirlenmiş ve iki grup arasında anlamlı bir fark izlenmemiştir (p>0.05). Yaşlı grupta belirgin bir komplikasyon izlenmemiştir. Yaşlı grupta daha yüksek komplikasyon ve kan transfüzyonu oranları olmaksızın, genç hasta grubuna benzer taşsızlık oranları elde edilmiştir. PNL, kompleks taş yapısı ya da soliter böbrek bulunması durumunda da 60 yaş ve üzerindeki hasta grubunda güvenle uygulanabilecek etkili bir tedavi yöntemidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAL, C., SOİKERİM, M., AKDOĞAN, B., TAFTACHI, A. R., GULİYEV, F., KENDİ, S., ŞAHİN, A. (2022). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients aged 60 years and older. Geriatri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 47–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/525160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Fuchs GJ, Patel A: Treatment of renal calculi. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Bagley DH: Smith's Textbook of Endourology. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1996, s 590-621
  2. Gupta M, Bolton DM, Gupta PN, Stoller ML: Urolithiasis in renal failure. J Urol 1994; 152: 1086. Stoller ML, Bolton D, Lezin MST, Lawrence M: Percutane- ous nephrolithotomy in the elderly. Urology 1994; 44: 651. Streem SB: Stone extraction. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Bagley DH: Smith's Textbook of Endourology. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1996, s 239-263.
  3. Türkiye Nüfusu. DİE, Nüfus Bilim Dergisi, HÜNEE, 2000.
  4. Şahin A, Erdem E, Öner S, Hasçiçek M, Bilen C, Tekin A, Kendi S: Perkütan nefrolitotomi: İlk 76 renal ünitedeki erken onuçlarımız. Üroloji Bülteni 1999; 10: 73-78.
  5. Serio A, Fraioli A.: Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. Neph- ron 1999; 81: 26. Gentle DL, Stoller ML, Bruce JE, Leslie SW.: Geriatric uro- lithiasis. J Urol 1997; 158: 2221. Blandy JP, and Singh M.: The case for a more aggressive app- roach to staghorn stones. J Urol 1976; 115: 505-506.
  6. Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM.: Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extra- corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1987; 138: 485-490.
  7. Lingeman JE, Smith LH, Woods JR.: Urinary Calculi: ESWL, Endourology, and Medical Therapy, Philadelphia, Lea&Febiger, 1989, s 325. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE: Percutaneous Nephrolitho- tomy, an update. Curr Opin Urol 2003; 13: 235-241.