SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3-4

The right to withdraw from the european union: is it the beginnigg of the end?

Avrupa birliğinde çekilme hakkı: sonun başlangıcı mı?

A. Aslı BİLGİN
Pages
205–244
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even though it may seem like a controversy to the integration aim of the Union, not to recognize a right of withdrawal to member states who are opposed to advanced integration would also jeopardize the future of European integration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Concomitant with the entry into force of Lisbon Treaty, a withdrawal clause is included in founding treaties which enables unconditional withdrawal option to every member state from the Union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The need for that clause in the Union and its possible effect(s) on the future of the European integration, whose aim is to establish an ever closer union among European citizens, are discussed in light of international and European Union Law.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even though it may seem like a controversy to the integration aim of the Union, not to recognize a right of withdrawal to member states who are opposed to advanced integration would also jeopardize the future of European integration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Concomitant with the entry into force of Lisbon Treaty, a withdrawal clause is included in founding treaties which enables unconditional withdrawal option to every member state from the Union. The need for that clause in the Union and its possible effect(s) on the future of the European integration, whose aim is to establish an ever closer union among European citizens, are discussed in light of international and European Union Law. While the withdrawal clause clarifies ambiguity on the right of withdrawal from the Union, it also emphasizes the sovereign rights of the member states. Even though it may seem like a controversy to the integration aim of the Union, not to recognize a right of withdrawal to member states who are opposed to advanced integration would also jeopardize the future of European integration.

Özet

Lizbon Antlaşmasının yürürlüğe girmesiyle kurucu antlaşmalara dahil olan çekilme hakkı, Birlik üyesi her devlete herhangi bir önkoşul getirmeksizin Birlikten çekilme hakkı tanımaktadır. Çekilme hakkını gerek uluslararası hukuk gerek Birlik hukuku kapsamında ele aldığımız çalışmamızda “Avrupa halkları arasında daha sıkı bir Birlik kurmak” hedefi ile yola çıkılan Avrupa Birliğinde çekilme hakkına ilişkin düzenleme yapılmasına neden ihtiyaç duyulduğu ve söz konusu düzenlemenin Birliğin geleceğini nasıl etkileyeceği başlıca araştırma konuları arasındadır. Yapılan düzenlemeyle çekilme hakkı hukuki bir zemine kavuşturularak belirsizlik giderilirken, üye devletlerin egemenlik yetkilerinin devamına vurgu yapılmıştır. Üye devletlere Birlikten çekilme hakkı tanınması her ne kadar entegrasyon amacına ters gibi görünse de daha ileri düzeyde entegrasyonu desteklemeyen üye devletleri Birlik içerisinde tutmak da entegrasyonun geleceğine zarar verecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, A. A. (2022). The right to withdraw from the european union: is it the beginnigg of the end?. Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3-4, 205–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/522804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. ARSAVA, Füsun, “Üye Devletlerin Anayasa Tasarısı Işığında Statüsü ve Etki Olanakları”, Uluslar arası Hukuk ve Politika, C. 2, S. 1, 2006, s. 77-90.
  2. ATHANASSIOU, Phoebus, Withdrawal and Expulsion from the EU and EMU, Some Reflections, European Central Bank Legal Working Paper Series, No.10, 2009, s. 1-48.
  3. BARNARD, Catherine, The Substantive Law of the EU: Four Freedoms, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013
  4. BAYKAL, Sanem, “Avrupa Birliği Hukuku”, (http://v2.etcf.org.tr/TR/ Genel/BelgeGoster.aspx?F6E10F8892433CFFAAF6AA849816B2EF3 4A6A1C05169DACA, erişim 15 Nisan 2014).
  5. BERGLUND, Sara, “Prison or Voluntary Cooperation? The Possibility of Withdrawal from the European Union”, Scandinavian Political Studies, C. 29, Sa. 2, 2006, s. 147-167.
  6. BLAGOEV, Boyko, “Expulsion of a Member State from the EU after Lisbon: Political Threat or Legal Reality?”, Tilburg Law Review, C. 16, 2011, s. 191-237.
  7. CHALMERS, Damian / HADJIEMMANUIL, Christos / MONTI, Giorgio / TOMKINS, Adam, European Union Law, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  8. CORBETT, Richard, “Cameron’s double blackmail”,(http://www. richardcorbett.org.uk/camerons-double-blackmail/, erişim 11 Nisan 2014).
  9. CRAIG, Paul / De BURCA, Grainne, EU Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
  10. DAMMANN, Jens C., “The Right to Leave the Eurozone “, Texas Internaional Law Journal, C. 1, Sa. 2, 2013, s. 125-155.
  11. De NORIEGA, Antonio Estella, The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and Its Critique, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
  12. De SCHOUTHEETE, Philippe, “Institutional Reform in the EU”, European Policy Brief, No.19, 2014, s. 1-8 (http://www.egmontinstitute. be/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/EPB19.pdf, erişim 11 Nisan 2014).
  13. De WAELE, Henri, “The European Union on the Road to a New Legal Order-The Changing Legality of Member State Withdrawal”, Tilburg Foreign Law Review, C. 12, 2005, s. 169-178.
  14. DIXON, Martin, Textbook on International Law, b. 6, Oxford 2007.
  15. DOĞAN, İlyas, Devletler Hukuku, b. 2, Ankara 2013.
  16. DOUKAS, Dimitrios, “The Verdict Of the German Federal Constitutional Court on the Lisbon Treaty: Not guilty, but don’t do it again!”, European Law Review, C. 34, 2009, s. 866-888.
  17. DÖRR, Oliver / SCHMALENBACH, Kirsten, Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties, A Commentary, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.
  18. EMMANOUILIDIS, Janis A., “Institutional Consequences of Differentiated Integration”, Bertelsmann Foundation and the Center for Applied Policy Research (C·A·P) Discussion Papers, 2007, s. 1-17.
  19. FRIEL, Raymond, “S