✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
In this study, 44 plants whose ethnobotanical usage by people of Elazığ arent consistent with the literature heve been determined.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 44 plants whose ethnobotanical usage by people of Elazığ arent consistent with the literature heve been determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 44 plants whose ethnobotanical usage by people of Elazığ arent consistent with the literature heve been determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, 44 plants whose ethnobotanical usage by people of Elazığ arent consistent with the literature heve been determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, 44 plants whose ethnobotanical usage by people of Elazığ arent consistent with the literature heve been determined.
Özet
Bu çalışmada, Elazığ halkı tarafından etnobotanik açıdan kullanılan fakat kullanım şekilleri literatür ile uygunluk göstermeyen 44 bitki tespit edilmiştir.
🔖
Cite This Article
CİVELEK, Ş., TÜRKOĞLU, İ. (2022). The ethnobotanical valued plants of Elazığ province. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 331–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/522383