Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

2, 4-d (2,4-diklorofenoksiasetik asit herbisitinin Kadife Balığı (Tinca tinca L., 1758) üzerindeki akut toksik etkisi

The acute toxic effect of 2,4-D 82, 4-Dichlorofenoxyaceticacid) upon tench (Tinca tinca L., 1758)

Pages
289–296
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The LC50 value was obtained as 48 mg/1 by the use of Behrens-Karber method,

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:96 hour LC50 values of 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorofenoxyacetic acid), a toxic herbicide which contaminates the aquatic ecosystem through agricultural activities, upon Tinea tinea L.,1758 in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out in two stages using 140 Tinea tinea L.,1758.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The LC50 value was obtained as 48 mg/1 by the use of Behrens-Karber method,
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

96 hour LC50 values of 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorofenoxyacetic acid), a toxic herbicide which contaminates the aquatic ecosystem through agricultural activities, upon Tinea tinea L.,1758 in this study. The experiment was performed by the use of static test method of aquatic toxicity testing. The study was carried out in two stages using 140 Tinea tinea L.,1758. The data obtained were statistically tested by Duzgunes' probit analysis method and average LC50 value for the Tinea tinea L.,1758 was found to be 41.76 mg/1. Apart from that the findings obtained from 2,4-D trials were statistically evaluated by the use of by E.P.A Finney probit analysis method and 96 - hour LC5o value for Tinea tinea L.,1758 was found to be 42.46 mg/1. The LC50 value was obtained as 48 mg/1 by the use of Behrens-Karber method,

Özet

Bu çalışmada tarımsal aktiviteler sonucu sucul ekosistemlere bulaşan 2,4-D (2,4-diklorofenoksiasetik asit) herbisitinin Tinea tınca L.,1758 üzerindeki 96 saatlik LC50 değeri saptanmıştır. Çalışma iki seri halinde sürdürülmüş ve 140 Tinea tinea L.,1758 bireyi kullanılmıştır. Veriler Düzgüneş'in probit analiz metoduyla istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiş ve Tinea tinea L.,1758 bireyleri için LCso değeri 41,76 mg/1 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca 2,4-D denemesinden elde edilen bulgular Finney'in probit analiz metoduyla istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiş ve Tinea tinea L.,1758 için 96 saatlik LC5o değeri 42,46 mg/1 olarak bulunmuşrur.Behrens-Karber metoduyla da LC50 değeri 48 mg/1 olarak bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIKAYA, R., YILMAZ, M., GÜL, A. (2022). 2, 4-d (2,4-diklorofenoksiasetik asit herbisitinin Kadife Balığı (Tinca tinca L., 1758) üzerindeki akut toksik etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 289–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/522305

References (1)

  1. Vural, N., Toksikoloji, University of Ankara Faculty of Pharmacy publication, No 73, page: 14, (1996) 2.Ardalı, Y., MS thesis, Ondokuz Mayis Üniv.,Samsun, (1990) 3.Brandao, J.C. and Bohets, H.L., Chemosphere, 25 (2),553-562, (1992) 4.Castano, A. And Cantarino, M.J., Chemosphere, 32(11), 2141-2157, (1996) 5.Osman, M.A. and Faust, S.D., Jour AWWA, 639-646, (1963) 6.Clark, D.E., Young, Younger, R.L. Hunt, L.M. and Mclaran, J.K., J. Agr. Food. Chem., 12(1), 43-45, (1964) 7.Eme,K., Acta Vet. Scand., 7, 77-96, (1966) 8.Erne, K., Acta Vet. Scand., 7, 240-256, (1966) 9.Clark, D.E.,Wright, F.C. and Hunt, L.M., J. Agr. Food. Chem., 15(1),171-173, (1967) 10.Guardigli, A., Chow, W. And Lefar, M.S,J. Agr. Food. Chem.,19(6), 1181-1182, (1971) 11.Peteghem, C.V. and Heyndrickx, A., 874-881,(1971) 12.Fang, S.C., Fallin, E. Montgomery, M.L. and Freed, V.H., Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 24, 555-563, (1973) 13.Somers, E., Moran, Jr. And Reinhart, B.S., Bull. Environ.Contain, and Toxicol,14(4), 339-342, (1974) 14.Clark, D., Palmer, J.S. Radeleff, R.D. Crookshank, H.R. and Farr,F.M., J. Agr. Food. Chem., 23 (3), 573-577, (1975) 15.Hattula, M.L.,Reunanen, H.E. Arstila, A.U. and Sorvari, T.E., Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 18(2), 152-158, (1977) 16.Duygu, E., I. Ulusal Zirai Mücadele ilacları Sempozyumu (I. National Agricultural Reagents symposium ), 92-99, (1979) 17.Neubert, J., Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 14(6), 643-651, (1986) 18.Ferrando, M.D., Sancho, E. and Moliner, E.A., J. Environ. SCI. Heath., B26(5-6), 491-498, (1991) 19.Hohreiter, D.W., Reinert, R.E. and Bush, P.B., Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 21, 325-331,(1991) 20.Morgan J.D., Vigers, A.G. Farreell, A.P. Janz, D.M. and Manville, J.F., Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10, 73-79, (1991) 21.Brando, C, Bohets, H.L. Vyver, I.E. and Dierickx, P.j., Chemosphere, 25(4), 553-662,(1992) 22.Hemmer, M.J., Middaugh, D.P. and Comparetta, V., Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 11, 401-408, (1992) 23.Morgan, M.J. and Kiceniuk, J.W., Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.,48(5), 772-780, (1992) 24.Richmonds, C. And Dutta, H.M., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 102(3), 523-526, (1992) 25.Sunderam, R.I.M, Cheng, D.M.H. and Thompson, G.B., Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,! 1, 1469-1476, (1992) 26.Anton, F.A., Laborda, E. Laborda, P. And Ramos, E., Bull.Environ. Contam. ToxicoL, 50(3), 400-406, (1993) 27.Bernal, J.L., Del-Nozal, MJ. and Jinenez, J.J., Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 39, 37-50, (1993) 28.Jonsson, CM. a