Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji / 2014 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Kars Kümbet Camisinin Deprem Davranışının Đncelenmesi Asuman

Pages
189–196
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, a detailed evaluation was done for the mosq.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Historical mosques constitute the important samples of cultural heritage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The historical mosq building was modeled as three- dimensional with SAP 2000 finite element software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, a detailed evaluation was done for the mosq.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Historical mosques constitute the important samples of cultural heritage. In the present study, Kumbet mosque, which is located in Kars, was examined for its structural behavior under earthquake accelerations. The historical mosq building was modeled as three- dimensional with SAP 2000 finite element software. Lineer analyses by using time history method was carried out. The values of displacement, stress and base shear force obtained from the analysis results were compared. Hence, a detailed evaluation was done for the mosq.

Özet

Tarihi camiler kültürel mirasımızın önemli örneklerini oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Kars ilinde bulunan kümbet caminin farklı deprem ivmeleri altındaki yapısal davranışları incelenmiştir. Tarihi yapı SAP2000 sonlu elemanlar programı ile üç boyutlu olarak modellenmiş ve zaman tanım alanı yöntemi kullanılarak doğrusal analizler yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarından elde edilen yer değiştirme, gerilme ve taban kesme kuvveti değerleri incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, K. A., ÇARHOGLU, I., ZABİN, P. (2022). Kars Kümbet Camisinin Deprem Davranışının Đncelenmesi Asuman. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 189–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/522267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Cross, N., Developments in Design Methodology, Chichester:Wiley, 1984
  2. Pahl., G. ve Beitz, W., Konstruktionslehre, 1st ed., Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1977
  3. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. ve Grote, K.H., Engineering Design – A Systematic Approach, Translated and Edited by Wallace, K., Blessing, L.,3 rd ed., London: Springer-Verlag, 2007
  4. Kurtoglu, T., Tumer, I. ve Jensen, D., “A functional failure reasoning methodology for evaluation of conceptual system architectures”, Research in Engineering Design, Cilt 21, No 4, 209-234, 2010
  5. Li, W., Li, Y., Wang, J. ve Liu, X., “The process model to aid innovation of products conceptual design”, Expert Systems with Applications, Cilt 37, No 5, 3574-3587, 2010
  6. Chong, Y., Chen, C.H. ve Leong, K., “A heuristicbased approach to conceptual design”, Research in Engineering Design, Cilt 20, No 2, 97-116, 2009
  7. He, B. ve Feng, P., “Research on collaborative conceptual design based on distributed knowledge resource”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Cilt 66, No 5-8, 645- 662, 2013
  8. Akao, Y., Quality Function Deployment, Productivity Press, Cambridge MA, 1990
  9. Altshuller, G., TRIZ keys to technical innovation, Worcester: Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 2005
  10. Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D. ve Phaal, R., “A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice”, Technovation, Cilt 33, No 2–3, 30-37, 2013
  11. Cavalucci, D., “How TRIZ can contribute to a paradigm change in R&D practices”, The Eighth TRIZ Symposium, Japan TRIZ Society, Tokyo, Japan, 1-54, 6-8 Eylül 2012
  12. Malmquist, J., Axelsson, R. ve Johansson M., “A Comparative Analysis of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving and the Systematic Approach of Pahl and Beitz”, In: ASME - DETC, Irvine, Proceedings of The DSTC, 1-11, 1996
  13. De Carvalho, M.A. ve Back, N., “CrossFertilization between TRIZ and the Systematic Approach to Product Planning and Conceptual Design”, TRIZ-CON2000 Proceedings, Worcester/MA, USA,1-12, 2000
  14. Dietz, T.P. ve Mistree, F., “Integrated Pahl and Beitz and the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving for the Conceptual Design of MultiDomain Systems”, ASME Conf. Proc., USA, 189- 203, 2009
  15. Tan, R., Ma, J., Liu, F. ve Wei, Z., “UXDs-driven conceptual design process model for contradiction solving using CAIs”, Computers in Industry, Cilt 60, No 8, 584-591, 2009
  16. Song, M.J., Lee, J.G., Park, J.M. ve Lee, S., “Triggering navigators for innovativ