Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Türkiye'de sanayi bölgelerinde yenilik süreçleri ve kobi'lerde yenilikçilik göstergeleri

Innovativeness in industrial districts of Turkey and indicators of innovation activities in SMEs

Pages
693–706
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the study show that general innovation indicators are not directly related with innovation capacity in sample industrial nodes, however networks, especially global networks are important for innovation activities in firms and regions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years “innovation” become an important concept of regional development literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In many regional development studies, innovation concept and indicators of innovation are defined as regards to regional economic and industrial characteristics and technological level of region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the study show that general innovation indicators are not directly related with innovation capacity in sample industrial nodes, however networks, especially global networks are important for innovation activities in firms and regions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent years “innovation” become an important concept of regional development literature. In many regional development studies, innovation concept and indicators of innovation are defined as regards to regional economic and industrial characteristics and technological level of region. In the context of the paper innovation indicators and relationship between firm networks and innovation capacity are researched in industrial nodes of Turkey. Paper depends on data of field survey, realised in Ankara, Bursa and Denizli. Results of the study show that general innovation indicators are not directly related with innovation capacity in sample industrial nodes, however networks, especially global networks are important for innovation activities in firms and regions.

Özet

Son dönemde bölgesel gelişme yazınında “yenilik” gelişme için önemli bir kavram olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bölgesel gelişme çalışmalarında yenilik kavramı ve yenilikçilik göstergeleri çalışmanın kapsamına, bölgenin ekonomik ve sanayi yapısına, teknoloji düzeyine göre tanımlanmaktadır. Makale kapsamında Türkiye’de sanayi odaklarında genel kabul gören yenilikçilik göstergelerinin ne kadar gelişmiş ve ne kadar geçerli olduğu, sanayi odaklarında firma ağları ve yenilikçilik kapasitesi arasındaki ilişki araştırılmaktadır. Makale Ankara, Bursa ve Denizli’de gerçekleştirilen alan araştırması verilerine dayanmakta ve araştırma sonuçları örnek sanayi bölgelerinde genel kabul gören göstergelerin yenilikçilik kapasitesi ile doğrudan ilişkili olmadığını, ancak firma ağlarının özellikle de küresel ağların önemini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖROĞLU, A. B. (2022). Türkiye'de sanayi bölgelerinde yenilik süreçleri ve kobi'lerde yenilikçilik göstergeleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 693–706. https://ajindex.com/articles/521693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Asheim, B.T., "Industrial Districts as Learning Regions: A Condition for Prosperity", European Planning Studies, 4(4): 379401 (1996). 2.Asheim, B. and Cooke, P., Local Network and Interactive Innovation Networks in a Global Economy, Making Connections: Technological Learning and Regional Economic Change, (ed.) E. Malecki, Oinas, P., Ashgate,England, 278-292 (1999). 3.Amin, A., "The Emilian Model: Institutional Changes", European Planning Studies, 7(4): 389-405 (1999). 4.Freeman, C., "Innovation in a New Context", Science Technology Industry Review, 15, OECD: 49-73 (1995). 5.Freeman, C. and Soete, E., Yenilik İktisadı, Tübitak Yayınları, Ankara, 1-526 (2003). 6.Romijn, H. and Albaladejo, M., "Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England", Research Policy, 31:1053-1067 (2002). 7.Koschatzky, K., "Innovation Networks of Industry and Business-Related Services- Relations between Innovation Intensity of Firms and Regional Inter-Firm Cooperation", European Planning Studies, 7(6): 737-758 (1999). 8.Sternberg, R., "Innovative Linkages and Proximity: Empirical Results from Recent Surveys of Small and Medium Sized Firms in German Regions", Regional Studies, 33(6): 529-540 (1999). 9.Arndt, O. and Strenberg, R., "Do Manufacturing Firms Profit from Intraregional Innovation Linkages? An Empirical Based Answer", European Planning Studies, 8(4): 465-486 (2000). 10.Cooke, P. and Morgan, K., "Growth Regions under Duress: Renewal strategies in Baden- Wiirttemberg and Emilia Romagna", A. Amin, N. Thirift, Globalisation, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 91-117 (1994). 11.Florida, R., "Toward the Learning Region", Futures, 27(5): 525-536 (1995). 12.Maskeli, P. and Malmberg, A., "Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 167-185 (1999). 13.Camagni, R. Innovation Networks; Spatial Perspectives, Belhaven Press, London, 1-212 (1991). 14.Camagni, R. and Capello, R., "The Role of Inter-SME Networking and Links in Innovative High-Technology Milieux", in High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, (ed.) D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson, Ashgate, England, 118-156 (2000). 15.Koschatzky, K., "A River is a River-Cross- Border Networking Between Baden and Alsace", European Planning Studies, 8(4): 429-450(2000). 16.Freel, M.S., "Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity", Research Policy, 32:751-7