Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Oralmukozanın şüpheli lezyonlarının teşhisinde kullanılan yardımcı yöntemler

Adjunctive techniques for examination of suspicious lesions of oralmucosa

Pages
201–208
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to explain indications, working principals, advantages and disadvantages of the techniques used for detection of suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Oral cancer is usually first diagnosed when it becomes symptomatic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By this stage approximately two thirds of patients will have already developed advanced disease and have a consequently diminished prognosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to explain indications, working principals, advantages and disadvantages of the techniques used for detection of suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Oral cancer is usually first diagnosed when it becomes symptomatic. By this stage approximately two thirds of patients will have already developed advanced disease and have a consequently diminished prognosis. The detection of premalignant and early malignant lesions of the oral mucosa allows for treatment that may be sufficiently early to prevent their progression to invasive carcinoma. Oral examination alone cannot always distinguish benign from premalignant and malignant lesions. Therefore, adjunctive techniques have been developed to improve the oral mucosal examination and facilitating the detection of and distinctions between oral benign and oral premalignant and malignant lesions. The aim of this review is to explain indications, working principals, advantages and disadvantages of the techniques used for detection of suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa.

Özet

Oral kanserler sıklıkla semptomatik olduklarında teşhis edilir. Bu dönemde vakaların yaklaşık üçte ikisi ilerlemiş kanserdir ve dolayısıyla hastalığın prognozu kötüdür. Oral mukozanın premalign ve erken malign lezyonlarının teşhisi, bu lezyonların ilerlemiş kanserlere dönüşümlerini engelleyecek tedavi seçeneklerine fırsat tanıyacaktır. Gözle muayene, her zaman benign lezyonların premalign ve malign lezyonlardan ayırt edilmesinde tek başına yeterli değildir. Oral mukoza muayenesini geliştirmek, premalign ve malign lezyonları benign lezyonlardan ayırt etmeyi kolaylaştırmak amacıyla yardımcı teknikler geliştirilmiştir. Bu derlemenin amacı oral mukozanın şüpheli lezyonlarını tanımlamak amacıyla kullanılan teknik ve araçların kullanım endikasyonları, çalışma prensipleri, avantaj ve dezavantajlarını anlatmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SADIK, E., ALKURT, M. T. (2022). Oralmukozanın şüpheli lezyonlarının teşhisinde kullanılan yardımcı yöntemler. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 201–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/521528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Axéll T, Pindborg JJ, Smith CJ, van der Waal I. Oral white lesions with special reference to precancerous and tobacco- related lesions: conclusions of an international symposium held in Uppsala, Sweden,May 18-21 1994. International Collaborative Group on OralWhite Lesions. J Oral Pathol Med 1996; 25: 49-54
  2. Balevi B. Evidence-based decision making: should the general dentist adopt the use of the VELscope for routine screening for oral cancer? J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73: 603-606
  3. BöckingA, Sproll C, Stöcklein N, Naujoks C, Depprich R, Kübler NR, Handschel J. Role of brush biopsy and DNA cytometry for prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and followup care of oral cancer. J Oncol doi:10.1155/2011/875959
  4. Christian DC. Computer-assisted analysis of oral brush biopsies at an oral cancer screening program. JAm DentAssoc 2002; 133: 357-362
  5. Duman O. Süleymaniye Doğumevi Kolposkopi Ünitesine 1994- 2000 Yılları Arasında Başvuran Hastaların Demografik Analizi. Süleymaniye Doğum ve Kadın Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Uzmanlık tezi, İstanbul, 2004
  6. Epstein JB, Feldman R, Dolor RJ, Porter SR. The utility of tolonium chloride rinse in the diagnosis of recurrent or second primary cancers in patients with prior upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Head Neck 2003; 25: 911-921
  7. Epstein JB, Gorsky M, Lonky S, Silverman S Jr, Epstein JD, Bride M. The efficacy of oral lumenoscopy (ViziLite) in visualizing oral mucosal lesions. Spec Care Dentist 2006; 26: 171- 174
  8. Epstein JB, Silverman S Jr, Epstein JD, Lonky SA, Bride MA. Analysis of oral lesion biopsies identified and evaluated by visual examination, chemiluminescence and toluidine blue. Oral Oncol 2008; 44: 538-544
  9. Farah CS, McCullough MJ. A pilot case control study on the efficacy of acetic acid wash and chemiluminescent illumination (ViziLite) in the visualisation of oral mucosal white lesions. Oral Oncol 2007; 43: 820-824
  10. Farah CS,McCulloughMJ. Oral cancer awareness for the general practitioner: new approaches to patient care. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 2-10
  11. Folsom TC, White CP, Bromer L, Canby HF, Garrington GE. Oral exfoliative study. Review of the literature and report of a three-year study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 61- 74
  12. Gandolfo S, PenteneroM, Broccoletti R, PaganoM, CarrozzoM, Scully C.Toluidine blue uptake in potentially malignant oral lesions in vivo: clinical and histological assessment.Oral Oncol 2006; 42: 89-95
  13. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray