Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

An Analysis of the Architectural Properties of Eyüp Çeribaşi Masjid: Conservation Problems and Proposals

Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, aholistic protection approach (physical and cultural) was established that aims to transfer to futuregenerations the structure and its surroundings, with their original identity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Here we investigate the protection problems of Çeribaşı Masjid, which has largely lost its spatialand visual identity and determine the available preservation approaches to the structure and itssurroundings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Çeribaşı Masjid remained in ruins fornearly two centuries and was repaired in 1996 by the Directorate General of Foundations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, aholistic protection approach (physical and cultural) was established that aims to transfer to futuregenerations the structure and its surroundings, with their original identity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Here we investigate the protection problems of Çeribaşı Masjid, which has largely lost its spatialand visual identity and determine the available preservation approaches to the structure and itssurroundings. Çeribaşı Masjid, which was built in the sixteenth century in Eyüp, İstanbul, consistsof a closed prayer hall, a cemetery, and an ablution place. Çeribaşı Masjid remained in ruins fornearly two centuries and was repaired in 1996 by the Directorate General of Foundations. Overtime, the rise of the roadway, inappropriate interventions, and unqualified additions made itdifficult to perceive the masjid and damaged its relationship with its surroundings. Within thescope of this study, in the historical process, the changes that occurred in the Çeribaşı Masjidwere examined together with archival documents, historical photos, and maps; the currentsituation of the masjid and its near surroundings were defined by the data obtained from measureddrawings and on-site examinations; and the incorrect interventions were identified. As a result, aholistic protection approach (physical and cultural) was established that aims to transfer to futuregenerations the structure and its surroundings, with their original identity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORBEYİ, N. (2022). An Analysis of the Architectural Properties of Eyüp Çeribaşi Masjid: Conservation Problems and Proposals. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/521359

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ahunbay, Z., “Eyüp’teki Osmanlı Eğitim Yapıları ve Korunmalarıyla İlgili Öneriler”, Tarihi, Kültürü ve Sanatıyla Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu IV Tebliğler, İstanbul, 132-142, (2000).
  2. Ahunbay, Z., Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon, Yapı Yayın, İstanbul, (2004).
  3. Ayan, S., “Eyüp Eski Kent Dokusu: Eyüp Cami ve Çevresi Tarihsel Gelişimi-Koruma Önerisi”, MSc.Thesis, Yıldız Technical University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, İstanbul, (1992).
  4. Ayverdi, E. H., Fatih Devri Sonlarında İstanbul Mahalleleri-Şehrin İskanı ve Nüfusu, Vakıflar Umum Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara, (1958).
  5. Baykan, C., Orbeyi, N. and Yalçın, S., “Göbekli Cam Üretim Teknolojisi ve Mimaride Pencere Camı Olarak Kullanımı”, SERES IV. Uluslararası Katılımlı Seramik, Cam, Emaye, Sır ve Boya Semineri, Eskişehir, 879-890, (2007).
  6. Çakır, O., “İstanbul'da Mescit Mimarisinin Gelişmesi”, MSc.Thesis, İstanbul University Art History Department, İstanbul, (1974).
  7. Dağdelen, İ., Alman Mavileri 1913-1914 I. Dünya Savaşı Öncesi İstanbul Haritaları, İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediye Başkanlığı Kütüphane ve Müzeler Müdürlüğü Yayınları, İstanbul, (2006).
  8. Eldem, N., “Eyüp Sultan Camii ve Yakın Çevresi”, Tarihi, Kültürü ve Sanatıyla Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu II Tebliğler, İstanbul, 51-53, (1998).
  9. Erdem, A., “Eyüp’te Sivil Mimarlık Örneği Ahşap Konutlar ve Korunma Sorunları”, Tarihi, Kültürü ve Sanatıyla Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu V Tebliğler, İstanbul, 144-151, (2002).
  10. Eyice, S., “Eyüpsultan Semtinde Tarih ve Sanat Tarihi”, Tarihi, Kültürü ve Sanatıyla Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu II Tebliğler, İstanbul, 12-37, (1998).
  11. Eyice, S., “Eyüp’te Zal Mahmud Paşa Camii”, Tarihi, Kültürü ve Sanatıyla Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu V Tebliğler, İstanbul, 12-21, (2002).
  12. Giray, K.S., Eyüpgiller, K., “Çatalca Vilayeti’ndeki Tarihi Camilerin Mimari Analizi”, Vakıf Restorasyon Yıllığı, 12: 106-119, (2016).
  13. Haskan, M.N., Eyüp Sultan Tarihi, Eyüpsultan Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul, (1996).
  14. Hattap, S., Köroğlu, N., “Eyüp’te Önemli Bir Kültür Varlığı: Rami Kışlası”, Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu Tebliğler I-X Seçki Tebliğler, İstanbul, 282-287, (2008).
  15. Hüseyin Ayvansarayi, Hadikatü’l-Cevami İstanbul Camileri ve Diğer Dini-Sivil Mimari Yapılar, İşaret Yayınları, İstanbul, (2001).
  16. ICOMOS, Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas (Washington Charter), (1987).
  17. İşli, E.D., “İstanbul Tekkeleri Mimarisi Eklentileri ve Restorasyonu”, PHd.Thesis, Yıldız Technical University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, İstanbul, 149, (1998). Kara