Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Planning Process of Sinan’s Ferhat Pasha Complex in Çatalca

Pages
59–76
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This system alsoplayed an important role in estimating the cost of the buildings and,tracing the outlines of the plans to the ground in cases where thedesigner cannot be found personally.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mimar Sinan served as the chief architect from 1538-1588 in the GoldenAge of the Ottoman Empire.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He was responsible for the design andconstruction of over 470 buildings of different sizes and functions.Unfortunately, Sinan’s methods of shaping, sizing, and construction areunknown since no records of his design principles have been found;however, the simultaneous construction of many buildings throughoutthe empire suggests that he used a common method, especially in thedesign of simple buildings of similar size and shape.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This system alsoplayed an important role in estimating the cost of the buildings and,tracing the outlines of the plans to the ground in cases where thedesigner cannot be found personally.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mimar Sinan served as the chief architect from 1538-1588 in the GoldenAge of the Ottoman Empire. He was responsible for the design andconstruction of over 470 buildings of different sizes and functions.Unfortunately, Sinan’s methods of shaping, sizing, and construction areunknown since no records of his design principles have been found;however, the simultaneous construction of many buildings throughoutthe empire suggests that he used a common method, especially in thedesign of simple buildings of similar size and shape. In this study, TheFerhat Pasha Complex in Çatalca, İstanbul has been chosen as anexample to investigate Sinan's design principles. In the first phase of thestudy, the compatibility of the examined building’s plan with themethods known to be used in different civilizations, like quadrature,golden ratio, grid system, etc., were investigated, revealing that the sizes,forms, and locations of buildings in the complex are in accordance witha modular grid system which was created with zira, an Ottoman unit ofmeasurement. In the study’s second phase, the stages in the emergenceof building design were shown by the inductive method. This system alsoplayed an important role in estimating the cost of the buildings and,tracing the outlines of the plans to the ground in cases where thedesigner cannot be found personally.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORBEYİ, N. (2022). Planning Process of Sinan’s Ferhat Pasha Complex in Çatalca. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 59–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/538341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Alberti, L. B. (1485). De re aedificatoria. On the art of building in ten books. (Translated by J. Rykwert et all., 1988).
  2. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  3. Alioğlu, F. and Orbeyi, N. (2011). Mimar Sinan Camilerinde Modüler Sistem. SIGMA Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Özel Sayı, 3(2), 331-40. Retrieved from http://www.ytusigmadergisi.com/pdfs/150.pdf
  4. Altan, K. (1936). Eski Mimarların Planları. Arkitekt, 7, 199. Arpat, A. (1986). Numerishcher Symbolismus in der Sakralen Architectur der Osmanen, II. Uluslararası Türk-İslam Bilim ve Teknoloji Tarihi Kongresi (April 28 - May 2), İstanbul: ITU, 2, 67- 80. Arseven, C. E. (1950).
  5. Arşın. Sanat Ansiklopedisi, I, 106-108. İstanbul:
  6. Milli Eğitim Basımevi. Batur, A. and Batur, S. (1968). Sinan bibliyografyası. In C. Bektaş (Ed.), Koca Sinan. Ankara, 79-92.
  7. Cantay, T. (1986). XVI. Yüzyıl Türk Mimarisinde Bazı Tasarım ve Çizim Esasları, II. Uluslararası Türk-İslam Bilim ve Teknoloji Tarihi Kongresi (April 28 - May 2), İstanbul:
  8. ITU, V. 2, pp. 53-65.
  9. Çamlıbel, N. (2000). Sinan Camilerinde Mekan-Strüktür İlişkisi, Tasarım Dergisi, 102, 100-106.
  10. Eilouti, B. (2012). Sinan and Palladio: Two Cultures and Nine Squares. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6, 1-18, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2010.495821 Erdem, A. and Özakın, R. (2006). An Analysis of Porched Courtyards in Mosques of the Classical Ottoman Period. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Possibilities of Numerical and Experimental Techniques, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference SAHC 2006. India, 2051- 2059.
  11. Erdenen, O. (1965). Eski Yapılarımızda Plan Meselesi. Mimarlık, 26, 19-23.
  12. Kuban, D. (2007). Osmanlı mimarisi. İstanbul:
  13. Yem Yayınları.
  14. Kuran, A. (1973). Mimar Sinan Yapısı Karapınar II. Selim Camisi’nin Proporsiyon Sistemi Üzerine Bir Deneme. VII. Türk Tarih Kongresi (September 25-29, 1970), Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2, 711-716.
  15. Mülayim, S. (2011). Mimar Sinan bibliyografyası. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  16. Necipoğlu, K. G. (1986). Plans and Models in 15th and 16th Century Ottoman Architectural Practice. Journal of the Society Architectural Historians, 45, 3, 224-243.
  17. Necipoğlu, G. (2005). The age of Sinan, architectural culture in the Ottoman Empire. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  18. Orbeyi, N. (2016). Çift Revaklı Sinan Camilerinde Modüler Sistem. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 2, 201-225. DOI: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2016.2.7 Ödekan, A. (1988). Kaynakça. In S. Bayram (Ed.), Mimarbaşı Koca Sinan Yaş