SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

A New Type of Urban Transportation: E-scooter

Yeni Bir Kent İçi Ulaşım Türü: E-scooter

M. Kürşat ÇUBUK
Fatih KARAÇOR
Hazal GÜLDÜR
Seda HATİPOĞLU
Pages
60–73
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important findings are that the user age range is between 16-60 years, they are generally used in short distance (~2km) and short-term (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Micromobility devices such as shared bicycle and scooter systems, have come to the fore as an alternative urban transportation system in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The e-scooter system emerges as a type of transportation that is widely used in the world in a short time due to the flexibility and ease of use it provides.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important findings are that the user age range is between 16-60 years, they are generally used in short distance (~2km) and short-term (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mikromobilite · Paylaşımlı e-scooter · Sürdürülebilir Kenstel Ulaşım

Abstract

Micromobility devices such as shared bicycle and scooter systems, have come to the fore as an alternative urban transportation system in recent years. The e-scooter system emerges as a type of transportation that is widely used in the world in a short time due to the flexibility and ease of use it provides. The use of e-scooters in the world literature is investigated in terms of; demography, travel time, journey distance, purpose of travel, safety problems, environmental effects, legal regulations and applications. The most important findings are that the user age range is between 16-60 years, they are generally used in short distance (~2km) and short-term (

Özet

Mikromobilite olarak sınıflandırılan paylaşımlı bisiklet ve scooter sistemleri, son yıllarda, alternatif bir kent içi ulaşım sistemi olarak gündeme gelmiştir. E-scooter sistemi, sağladığı esneklik ve kolay kullanımı sebebiyle kısa sürede dünyada oldukça fazla kullanılan bir ulaşım türü olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Dünya literatüründeki e-scooter kullanımı; demografi, yolculuk süresi, yolculuk mesafesi, yolculuk amacı, güvenlik sorunları, çevresel etkileri, yasal düzenleme ve uygulamaları başlıkları altında incelenmiştir. Kullanıcı yaş aralığının 16-60 yaş aralığında dağılım gösterdiği, genelde kısa mesafeli (~2km) ve kısa süreli (

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUBUK, M. K., KARAÇOR, F., GÜLDÜR, H., HATİPOĞLU, S. (2022). A New Type of Urban Transportation: E-scooter. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 60–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/520666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nation, “World Urbanization Prospects 2018,” Webpage, 2018.
  2. J. Jiao and S. Bai, “Understanding the shared e-scooter travels in Austin, TX,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 9, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijgi9020135
  3. S. E. Bibri and J. Krogstie, “Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 31, pp. 183–212, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
  4. D. Hoornweg, L. Sugar, and C. L. T. Gómez, “Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: moving forward,” Environ. Urban., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 207–227, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0956247810392270
  5. C. Chavez-Baeza and C. Sheinbaum-Pardo, “Sustainable passenger road transport scenarios to reduce fuel consumption, air pollutants and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area,” Energy, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 624–634, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.047
  6. S. Das, “Competitive or Complementary: A Spatiotemporal Investigative Analysis into Austin ’ s Shared Micromobility Modes.,” The University of Texas at Austin, 2020
  7. C. S. Smith and P. J. Schwieterman, “E-Scooter Scenarios: Evaluating the Potential Mobility Benefits of Shared Dockless Scooters in Chicago,” Chaddick Inst. Policy Ser., no. 1, pp. 6–8, 2018
  8. N. Fearnley, E. Johnsson, and S. H. Berge, “Patterns of E-Scooter Use in Combination with Public Transport,” Findings, vol. 2019, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.32866/001c.13707
  9. S. O’hern and N. Estgfaeller, “A scientometric review of powered micromobility,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12229505
  10. Z. Zou, H. Younes, S. Erdoğan, and J. Wu, “Exploratory Analysis of Real-Time E-Scooter Trip Data in Washington, D.C.,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 2674, no. 8, pp. 285–299, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0361198120919760
  11. OECD/ITF, “Safe Micromobility,” p. 98, 2020, [Online]. Available:
  12. A. Demeyere, “Techno-economic analysis of micro-mobility providers: derivation of viability conditions,” 2020
  13. S. Shaheen and A. Cohen, “Shared Micromobility Policy Toolkit,” pp. 1–34, 2019, doi: 10.7922/G2TH8JW7
  14. W. Riggs and M. Kawashima, “Exploring Best Practice for Municipal E-Scooter Policy in the United States,” in 99th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2020, pp. 415–422
  15. S. Shaheen, A. Cohen, and I. Zohdy, “Shared Mobility: Current Practice