AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightCONCLUSION: It has been determined that the contents of distance education in health sciences for theoretical and applied courses should be further developed with a technological approach.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
AIM: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the online education provided to students during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: The research was carried out with 841 students studying for undergraduate and associate degrees in a health sciences university. The research was designed with qualitative and quantitative features using a mixed method. In the quantitative phase, an online questionnaire consisting of eight questions covering socio-demographic data and experiences in the COVID-19 process was used. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews were conducted online using a semi-structured interview form. The qualitative design was carried out and reported in accordance with the criteria of “COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ).” RESULTS: Of the students who responded, 75.5% (n = 635) stated that they attended 76–100% of the total number of courses, and 56.1% of them stated that the efficiency of their lessons was over 50%. The analysis of the data was done manually according to Heidegger philosophy, in accordance with the steps of the data analysis method of Colaizzi (1978). As a result of the content analysis, three main themes and 21 categories were determined. The following themes were achieved: “Better than nothing!” for positive aspects of students’ experiences, “Face-to-face education is better!” for negative aspects, and “It could have been better!” for their suggestions. CONCLUSION: It has been determined that the contents of distance education in health sciences for theoretical and applied courses should be further developed with a technological approach.