Journals / Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Reflection of Learning Styles on Students’ Anxiety and Learning Levels in Simulation Education: An Obstetrics and Neonatology Nursing Experience

Pages
186–193
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The pretest/posttest results and perceived learning levels showed that simulation helped to achieve learning in all types of learners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Research ArticleFlorence Nightingale Journal of Nursing Reflection of Learning Styles on Students’ Anxiety and Learning Levels in Simulation Education: An Obstetrics and Neonatology Nursing ExperienceZehra Kan Öntürk1, Merve Kanığ1, Ergül Aslan2, Sema Kuğuoğlu31Department of Nursing, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey2Department of Women Health and Gynecologic Nursing, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, İstanbul, Turkey3Department of Nursing, İstanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Health Science, İstanbul, TurkeyAbstractAIM: This study aimed to investigate whether the learning styles of nursing students affected their anxiety and learning levels during simulation education.METHOD: This was a cross-sectional and quasi-experimental study, which included a total of 60 nursing students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Learning Styles Inventory III, the Trait Anxiety Scale, and a pretest were used before the simulation education, and the Perceived Learning Scale and a posttest were used after the simulation education to collect data.RESULTS: According to data from the learning styles inventory, 81.6% of the students had a diverging learning style, 11.7% had an assimilating learning style, and 6.7% had an accommodating learning style.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The pretest/posttest results and perceived learning levels showed that simulation helped to achieve learning in all types of learners.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Research ArticleFlorence Nightingale Journal of Nursing Reflection of Learning Styles on Students’ Anxiety and Learning Levels in Simulation Education: An Obstetrics and Neonatology Nursing ExperienceZehra Kan Öntürk1, Merve Kanığ1, Ergül Aslan2, Sema Kuğuoğlu31Department of Nursing, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey2Department of Women Health and Gynecologic Nursing, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, İstanbul, Turkey3Department of Nursing, İstanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Health Science, İstanbul, TurkeyAbstractAIM: This study aimed to investigate whether the learning styles of nursing students affected their anxiety and learning levels during simulation education.METHOD: This was a cross-sectional and quasi-experimental study, which included a total of 60 nursing students. The students received simulation education about labor management and first care of newborns. The Learning Styles Inventory III, the Trait Anxiety Scale, and a pretest were used before the simulation education, and the Perceived Learning Scale and a posttest were used after the simulation education to collect data.RESULTS: According to data from the learning styles inventory, 81.6% of the students had a diverging learning style, 11.7% had an assimilating learning style, and 6.7% had an accommodating learning style. The mean state anxiety score was 49.83 ± 10.59 just before the simulation. The mean pretest score was 51.50 ± 16.96 and the mean posttest score was 54.17 ± 15.22. The perceived learning score was 35.45 ± 5.12. There was a significant difference in anxiety levels in terms of learning styles (p < .005).CONCLUSION: Most of the students in this study had a diverging learning style. Their anxiety levels did not change depending on their learning styles. The pretest/posttest results and perceived learning levels showed that simulation helped to achieve learning in all types of learners.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, E., KANIĞI, M., ÖNTÜRK, Z. K., KUĞUOĞLU, S. (2022). Reflection of Learning Styles on Students’ Anxiety and Learning Levels in Simulation Education: An Obstetrics and Neonatology Nursing Experience. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 186–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/517336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Albayrak, E., Gungoren, O. C., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Ad-aptation of Perceived Learning Scale to Turkish. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 33(1), 1-14.
  2. Baker, B. G., Bhalla, A., Doleman, B., Yarnold, E., Simons, S., Lund, J. N., & Williams, J. P. (2016). Simulation fails to replicate stress in trainees performing a technical procedure in the clin-ical environment. Medical Teacher, 1-5. [Crossref] Blasco, J. A. S., Blasco, M. B., Blasco, M. C. N., Recuenco, M. N., Pacheco, B. N., Hernáiz, M. J. G., & Recuenco, M. J. O. (2009). Stress in the intensive care unit in terms of the de-grees of learning styles. Metas De Enfermería, 12(10),62-69.
  3. Cato, M. L. (Ed.). (2013). Nursing Student Anxiety in Simu-lation Settings: A Mixed Methods Study. Portland State Uni-versity, pp. 185. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/view-content.cgi?article=2034&context=open_access_etds
  4. Celik, F., & Sahin, H. (2011). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğret-menliği öğretmen adaylarının cinsiyet ve ögrenim gördükleri sınıf düzeyleri bakımından öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi (MAKÜ örneği). Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 31, 23-38.
  5. Durmaz Edeer, A., & Sarıkaya, A. (2015). Use of simulation in nursing education and simulation types. Journal of Educa-tion and Research in Nursing, 12(2),121-125. [Crossref] Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation de-briefing.Simulation in Healthcare,10(2), 106-115. [Crossref] Evin Gencel, İ. (2007). Kolb’un deneyimsel ogrenme kur-amına dayalı ogrenme stilleri Envanteri-III’ un Turkceye uyar-lama çalısması. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Ensti-tusu Dergisi, 9(2), 120-139.
  6. Gonzales, L. K., Glaser, D., Howland, L., Clark, M. J., Hutchins, S., Macauley, K., Close JF, Leveque, N.L, Failla, K.R, Brooks, R., Ward, J. (2017). Assessing learning styles of graduate entry nursing students as a classroom research activity: A quan-titative research study. Nurse Education Today, 48, 55-61. [Crossref] Gordon, T., (2014). Etkili ogretmenlik egitimi. Profil yayıncılık, İstanbul.Goris, S., Bilgi, N., & Bayındır, S. K. (2014). Use of simulation in nursing education. Journal of Duzce University Health Sci-ences Institute, 1(2), 25-29.
  7. Kolb, A. Y. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resource Direct, 1-72. https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topic