SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Psychometrics of Stanford Presenteeism Scale-Short Form in Turkish

Ezgi TEOMAN
Arzu Kader HARMANCI SEREN
Pages
190–195
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to be used among nurses in different studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Presenteeism means that employees feel obliged to go to work even if there is a real problem that they cannot work.The main purpose is to to adapt the “Stanford Presenteeism Scale-Short Form” into Turkish on Nurses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample included the nurses working at the medical and surgical clinics of two public hospitals in 2017 in İstanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to be used among nurses in different studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AIM: Presenteeism means that employees feel obliged to go to work even if there is a real problem that they cannot work.The main purpose is to to adapt the “Stanford Presenteeism Scale-Short Form” into Turkish on Nurses. METHOD: This is a methodological study. The study sample included the nurses working at the medical and surgical clinics of two public hospitals in 2017 in İstanbul. A total of 290 nurses participated in the study. Language, content, construct validities, total item correlation analysis, Kaiser Meyer Olkin, Bartlett tests, confirmatory and explanatory factor analysis (EFA), stability, and Cronbach’s alpha reliability analyses were tested. RESULTS: The content validity index of the scale was .92. Two items that have correlation values below .40 were removed from the Turkish form. Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was .762. The structure of the four-item and single-factor Turkish form was confirmed. CONCLUSION: Stanford Presenteeism Scale-Short Form is a valid and reliable tool for the nurses in Turkey. It is recommended to be used among nurses in different studies. Hospital and nursing care service managers should deal with “presenteeism,” since it is becoming a critical health human resource workforce issue. Health care managers may use this tool to evaluate the presenteeism level of their employees.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEOMAN, E., SEREN, A. K. H. (2022). Psychometrics of Stanford Presenteeism Scale-Short Form in Turkish. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 190–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/517311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2018).
  2. Introduction to nursing research. MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers Learning. Çapık, C., Gözüm, S., & Aksayan, S. (2018). Intercultural scale adaptation stages, language and culture adaptation: Updated guideline (Original work published in Turkish). Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 26, 199–210. [CrossRef] Cicolini, G., Pelle, C. D., Cerratti, F., Franza, M., & Flacco, M. E. (2016). Validation of the Italian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(5), 598–604. [CrossRef] Cooper, C. L., & Lou, L. (2016). Presenteeism at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Cooper, C. L., Lu, L., Tung, R., & Ralston, D. (2016). Presenteeism as a global phenomenon: Unravelling the psychosocial mechanisms from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 23(2), 216–231. [CrossRef] Coulacoglou, C., & Saklofske, D. H. (2017). Psychometrics and psychological assessment: Principles and applications. Cambridge: Academic Press.
  4. Durand, M. J., Vachon, B., Hong, Q. N., Imbeau, D., Amick III, B. C., & Loisel, P. (2004). The cross-cultural adaptation of the work role functioning questionnaire in Canadian French. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27(4), 261–268. [CrossRef] Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Özdamar, K., & Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: Review (Original work published in Turkish). Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210–223. [CrossRef] Johns, G. (2015). Presenteeism. Wiley Encyclopaedia of Management, 1(1). [CrossRef] Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., Hackleman, P., Gibson, P., Holmes, D. M., & Bendel, T. (2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44(1), 14–20. [CrossRef] Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2230. [CrossRef] Laranjeira, C. A. (2013). Validation of the Portuguese version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 19(6), 644–650. [CrossRef] Lohaus, D., & Habermann, W. (2019). Presenteeism: A review and research directions. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 43–58. [CrossRef] Orcan, F. (2018). Exploratory and confirmat