Journals / Fiscaoeconomia / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Effects Of Economic, Political and Social Globalization On Ecological Footprint: The Case Of ASEAN-5 Countries

Ekonomik, Politik Ve Sosyal Küreselleşmenin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerindeki Etkileri: ASEAN-5 Ülkeleri Örneği

Pages
656–676
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, according to the results of the panel causality test, a bidirectional causality relationship was reached between ecological footprint and political and social globalization, and a unidirectional causality relationship towards energy consumption and economic globalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, increasing economic, political and social interactions with the increasing effect of globalization have led to an increase in people's demands and it has been observed that different effects on the environmental quality of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the relationship between ecological footprint, energy consumption and economic, political and social globalization is examined in the ASEAN-5 country sample for the years 1986-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, according to the results of the panel causality test, a bidirectional causality relationship was reached between ecological footprint and political and social globalization, and a unidirectional causality relationship towards energy consumption and economic globalization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekolojik Ayak İzi · Küreselleşme · Panel Veri Analizi

Abstract

In recent years, increasing economic, political and social interactions with the increasing effect of globalization have led to an increase in people's demands and it has been observed that different effects on the environmental quality of countries. In this study, the relationship between ecological footprint, energy consumption and economic, political and social globalization is examined in the ASEAN-5 country sample for the years 1986-2017. Panel cointegration, Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimator and Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality tests were used in the analysis. According to the findings, the variables move together in the long run. In addition, it was obtained with the finding that energy consumption increases the ecological footprint in countries with significant results, and that all three globalization dimensions show different results from country to country. Finally, according to the results of the panel causality test, a bidirectional causality relationship was reached between ecological footprint and political and social globalization, and a unidirectional causality relationship towards energy consumption and economic globalization. There is a bidirectional causality relationship from energy consumption to political and social globalization, and a unidirectional causality relationship to economic globalization.

Özet

Son yıllarda küreselleşmenin artan etkisiyle birlikte artan ekonomik, politik ve sosyal etkileşimler insanların taleplerinin artmasına neden olmakta ve ülkelerin çevre kalitelerinin üzerinde farklı etkiler ortaya çıkardığı gözlemlenmektedir. Bu çalışmada ekolojik ayak izi, enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik, politik ve sosyal küreselleşme arasındaki ilişki 1986-2017 yılları arası için ASEAN-5 ülke örnekleminde incelenmektedir. Analizde panel eşbütünleşme, Genişletilmiş Ortalama Grup (AMG) tahmincisi ve Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel nedensellik testleri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre uzun dönemde değişkenler birlikte hareket etmektedirler. Ayrıca anlamlı sonuç elde edilen ülkelerde enerji tüketiminin ekolojik ayak izini artırdığı, üç küreselleşme boyutunun da ülke ülke farklı sonuçlar ortaya koyduğunu gösterir bulgula elde edilmiştir. Son olarak uygulanan panel nedensellik test sonuçlarına göre ise, ekolojik ayak izi ile politik ve sosyal küreselleşme arasında çift yönlü, enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik küreselleşmeye doğru ise tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisine ulaşılmıştır. Enerji tüketiminden politik ve sosyal küreselleşmeye doğru çift yönlü, ekonomik küreselleşmeye doğru ise tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAĞLIKARA, A. (2022). Effects Of Economic, Political and Social Globalization On Ecological Footprint: The Case Of ASEAN-5 Countries. Fiscaoeconomia, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 656–676. https://ajindex.com/articles/516591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahmad, M. Jiang, P., Murshed,M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L. & Khan, Z. (2021). Modelling The Dynamic Linkages Between Eco-Innovation, Urbanization, Economic Growth And Ecological Footprints For G7 Countries: Does Financial Globalization Matter?, Sustainable Cities and Society, 70, 102881, Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., & Mahmood, F. (2019). Does Globalization Increase The Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence From Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 18565–18582.
  2. Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL, Ecological Indicators, 121, 107060, Apaydin, Ş., Ursavaş, U. & Koç, Ü. (2021). The Impact Of Globalization On The Ecological Footprint: Do Convergence Clubs Matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 53379–53393.
  3. BP (2021). Statistical Review of World Energy. Breusch, T.S. & Pagan, A.R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 239–253.
  4. Destek, M.A., & Sarkodie, S.A., (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Science of The Total Environment, 650, 2483e2489. Dreher, A. (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence From A New Index Of Globalizationcall_Made. Applied Economics 38(10), 1091-1110.
  5. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  6. Eberhardt, M. & Teal, F. (2011), Econometrics For Grumblers: A New Look At The Literature On crosscountry Growth Empirics, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(1), 109–155.
  7. Eberhardt, M. V & Teal, F., (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production, Economics Series Working Papers 515, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. Figge, L., Oebels, K. & Offermans, A. (2017). The Effects Of Globalization On Ecological Footprints: An Empirical Analysis. Environment Development and Sustainability 19, 863–876.
  8. Gallagher, K.P. (2009). Economic Globalization And The Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 279-304. GFN, (2017). Global Footprint Network: National Footprint Accounts. Https://www.footprintnetwork.org/. (Erişim Tarihi:01.01.2022)
  9. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N. & Sturm, J.E. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index – Revis