Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 654

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNMENTAL GRANT MECHANISMS IN TURKEY: LINKING WITH ENTREPRENEURSHIP

TÜRKĠYE’DE KAMU HĠBE MEKANĠZMALARININ ETKĠNLĠĞĠ: GĠRĠġĠMCĠLĠK ĠLE KURULAN BAĞLANTI

Pages
9–45
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, this result led to further need to search the outcomes of types and amounts of governmental grant mechanism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Small businesses play a significant role in economic development and growth in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to boost regional development, the government allocates grants to current or prospective entrepreneurs in order to increase the number of new firms, jobs, and economic activities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, this result led to further need to search the outcomes of types and amounts of governmental grant mechanism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Small businesses play a significant role in economic development and growth in Turkey. This paper explores a rather different puzzle, which can be named as the questioning of the existence or nonexistence effect of government grants on entrepreneurship. In order to boost regional development, the government allocates grants to current or prospective entrepreneurs in order to increase the number of new firms, jobs, and economic activities. However, the grant programs are now controversial since they are criticized of their effectiveness. In this paper, the effectiveness of major governmental grant mechanisms has been assessed through econometric analysis. Contrary to the expectations, the outcomes of the analysis showed that the grants provided by public institutions have insignificant effects on the stimulation of entrepreneurship, in the context of new firm establishment and new firm birth rate. Therefore, this result led to further need to search the outcomes of types and amounts of governmental grant mechanism.

Özet

Küçük iĢletmeler, Türkiye‟nin ekonomik kalkınması ve büyümesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalıĢma ile kamunun sağladığı hibe mekanizmalarının giriĢimcilik üzerinde var olan veya olmayan etkileri sorgulanmaktadır. Bölgesel kalkınmayı tetiklemek için giriĢimcilere kamu fonları aktarılmaktadır. Bu vesile ile yeni firma sayılarının, istihdamın ve ekonomik hareketliliğin artırılması hedeflenmektedir. Fakat günümüzde kamunun sağladığı hibeler verimlilik çerçevesinden bakıldığında sorgulanmaktadır. Bu makalede, ekonometrik analizler aracılığıyla Türkiye‟nin öne çıkan hibe programlarının verimliliği incelenmektedir. Beklentilerin aksine, çıkan sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, dağıtılan hibelerin kurulan yeni firma sayısı ve yeni firma doğum oranına anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Bu araĢtırma neticesinde, hibe mekanizmaların türlerine ve miktarlarına göre yeni çalıĢmaların yapılmasına ihtiyaç duyulduğu ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARTAL, M. O., GÖNEL, F. (2022). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNMENTAL GRANT MECHANISMS IN TURKEY: LINKING WITH ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 654, 9–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/516525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ACS, Z. J. and SZERB, L. (2007), “Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Public Policy”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2/3 (Mar.), pp. 109-122.
  2. ALAM, S. (2013), “The Impact of Credit and Non-Credit Aspects on Self-Employment Profit: A Comparison of Microcredit Programs and Commercial Lenders in Rural Bangladesh”, The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 47 (1) (Spring), pp. 23-45.
  3. ALDRICH, H. E. (1999),
  4. Organisations Evolving, Sage Publications. ALVAREZ, S. and BUSENITZ, L. (2001), “The Entrepreneurship of Resource Based Theory”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27, pp. 755-775.
  5. AYELE, S. (2006), “The Industry and Location Impacts of Investment Incentives on SME‟s Start-up in Ethiopia”, Journal of International Development, Vol. 18, pp. 1-13.
  6. BARTIK, T. J. (1992), “The Effects of State and Local Taxes on Economic Development: A Review of Recent Research”, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol.6 (1), pp. 102- 110. BLATTMAN, C., FIALA, N., and MARTINEZ S. (2014), “Generating Skilled SelfEmployment in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from Uganda”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 697–752.
  7. BONDONIO, D. and GREENBAUM, R. T. (2007), “Do Local Tax Incentives Affect Economic Growth? What Mean Impacts Miss in the Analysis of Enterprise Zone Policies”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 37, pp. 121-136.
  8. BORELLO J. A. (1995), “Regional Development and Industrial Promotion in Argentina: A Review of Events and Writings”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 19 (4), pp. 576-592. BOURLÈS, R. and COZARENCO, A. (2014), “State Intervention and the Microcredit Market: The Role of Business Development Services”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 43 (4), Special Issue: Firm Growth and Innovation (Dec.), pp. 931-944.
  9. DAVIDSON, P. and HONING, B. (2003), “The Role of Social and Human Capital among Nascent Entrepreneurs”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20, p. 121. CARD, J. (2015), “Free Money? How to Access Government Grants”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/small-business-network/2015/apr/16/free-money-accessgovernment-grants-business (access on Jan 15th, 2019).
  10. CHEN, C. C. (2014), “Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth, and Employment: A Case Study of Taiwan”, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Vol. 55 (1) (June), pp. 71-88.
  11. DOGAN, C. (2011), “II. Mahmut Dönemi Osmanli Merkezilesme Politikasinin Dogu Vilayetlerinde Uygulanmasi”, Turkish Studies - International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or