Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 660

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE FINANCIAL STRESS INDEX ONSELECTED MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS: EVIDENCE FROMTURKEY

FİNANSAL STRES ENDEKSİNİN SEÇİLİ MAKROEKONOMİK GÖSTERGELER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
71–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, we could not find any causality relationship from the financial stress index to the real effective rate and inflation rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The financial stress index, which reaches a single value by evaluating various indicators related to financial markets such as interest rates, yield spreads, and stock market indices, tries to measure pressure in the financial markets and allows investors, policy makers, and researchers to assess financial market conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this paper is to analyze the causality relationship between the financial stress index and selected indicators related to macroeconomic performance for Turkey over the period of 2007:01-2021:01.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, we could not find any causality relationship from the financial stress index to the real effective rate and inflation rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The financial stress index, which reaches a single value by evaluating various indicators related to financial markets such as interest rates, yield spreads, and stock market indices, tries to measure pressure in the financial markets and allows investors, policy makers, and researchers to assess financial market conditions. The aim of this paper is to analyze the causality relationship between the financial stress index and selected indicators related to macroeconomic performance for Turkey over the period of 2007:01-2021:01. In order to test the impact of the financial stress index on macroeconomic indicators, we employ the Fourier causality test developed by Enders and Jones (2016) and the Fourier Toda Yamamoto causality test suggested by Nazlioglu et al. (2016). Our findings support the evidence of short-term impact of the financial stress index on the industrial production index, unemployment rate, reel sector confidence index and central bank reserves. On the other hand, we could not find any causality relationship from the financial stress index to the real effective rate and inflation rate.

Özet

Finansal piyasalara iliĢkin faiz oranları, getiri marjları ve hisse senedi endeksi gibi çeĢitli göstergeleri birlikte değerlendirerek genel bir değere ulaĢan finansal stres indeksi, finansal piyasalardaki baskıyı ölçmeye çalıĢmakta; yatırımcılar, politika yapıcıları ve araĢtırmacıların finansal piyasalara iliĢkin bir durum değerlendirmesi yapmasına olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu çalıĢmanın amacı, Türkiye için, 2007:01-2021:01 döneminde, finansal stres endeksi ile makroekonomik performansa iliĢkin seçili göstergeler arasındaki nedensellik iliĢkisinin yapısal kırılmalar dikkate alınarak analiz edilmesidir. Analizde, Enders ve Jones (2016) tarafından geliĢtirilen Fourier nedensellik testi ve Nazlıoğlu ve diğ. (2016) tarafından geliĢtirilen Fourier Toda Yamamoto nedensellik testinden yararlanılmaktadır. Analiz sonuçları, finansal stres endeksinin sanayi üretim endeksi, iĢsizlik oranı, reel kesim güven endeksi ve merkez bankası rezervleri üzerindeki etkisini iĢaret ederken; söz konusu endeksin reel efektif kur ve enflasyon üzerinde kısa dönemde etkisi olmadığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILCI, E. N. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE FINANCIAL STRESS INDEX ONSELECTED MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS: EVIDENCE FROMTURKEY. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 660, 71–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/516482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Al, Ġ. ve Yıldız, E. B. (2019), Türk ye’n n 2006-2017 Dönem Makroekonom k Performansı: S h rl Kare YaklaĢımı, Atatürk Ün vers tes İkt sad ve İdar B l mler Derg s, 33(1), 303-320.
  2. Becker, R., Enders, W. ve Lee, J. (2006), A Stationarity Test in the Presence of An Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409.
  3. Berüment, H. ve Dinçer, N. (2004), Do Capital Flows Improve Macroeconomic Performance in Emerging Markets?: The Turkish Experience, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40:4, 20-32.
  4. Bloomberg (2020), Ekonomik Veriler ve Gündem. https://www.bloomberght.com/reelkesim-guven-endeksi-aciklandi-2271437 (EriĢim tarihi: 10.01.2021).
  5. Bozoklu, S., Yılancı, V. ve GörüĢ, M. S. (2020), Persistence in Per Capita Energy Consumption: A Fractional Integration Approach with a Fourier Function, Energy Economics, 91, 104926. Christopoulos, D. ve Leon-Ledesma, M. (2011),
  6. International Output Convergence, Breaks, and Asymmetric Adjustment, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 15(3), 67-97.
  7. Çevik, E. Ġ., Dibooglu, S. ve Kenc, T. (2013),
  8. Measuring Financial Stress in Turkey, Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(2), 370-383.
  9. Demiralp, S. (2021), 2021’e Girerken Ekonomik Görünüm. https://yetkinreport.com/ 2021/01/04/2021e-girerken-ekonomik-gorunum/ (EriĢim tarihi: 05.02.2021).
  10. Dünya Bankası (2020), Türkiye Ekonomi Monitörü: Yelkenleri Ayarlamak. https://www.worldbank.org/tr/country/turkey/publication/economic-monitor (EriĢim tarihi: 13.01.2021).
  11. Eğilmez (2021), 2021 Yılı BaĢında Türkiye Ekonomisinin Görünümü. https://www.mahfiegilmez.com /2021/01/2021-yl-basnda-turkiye-ekonomisinin.html (EriĢim tarihi: 21.01.2021).
  12. Ekren, N., Alp, E. A. ve Yağmur, M. H. (2017), Macroeconomic Performance Index: A New Approach to Calculation of Economic Wellbeing, Applied Economics, 49(53), 5462-5476.
  13. Enders, W. ve Lee, J. (2012), The Flexible Fourier Form and the Dickey-Fuller Type Unit Root Tests, Economics Letters, 117, 196-199.
  14. Enders, W. ve Jones, J. (2016),
  15. Grain Prices, Oil Prices, and Multiple Smooth Breaks in a VAR, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 20(4), 399-419.
  16. Euler Hermes (2020), Türkiye Makroekonomik Görünüm. https://www.eulerhermes. com/content /dam/ onemarketing/ehndbx/eulerhermes_com/tr_ TR/documents/ economik-yayınlar/euler-hermes-makro-ekonomik-gorunum-raporu-mart-2020.pdf (21.11.2020).
  17. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2020),
  18. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Real Gross Domestic Product https://fred.stlouisfed.org