Journals / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Prevalence of Tooth Number Anomalies and Their Distribution by Genders

Pages
115–119
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this way, psychological, aesthetic, phonational, and physical problems that may occur in the future lives of children and adolescents can be prevented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to examine the dental anomalies (tooth number, size, and structural anomalies) in a group of pediatric dental population and the difference between the genders in terms of the prevalence of these anomalies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this retrospective study, digital orthopantomograms belonging to 5000 patients aged 5-14 years, taken at the Faculty of Dentistry of Erciyes University were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this way, psychological, aesthetic, phonational, and physical problems that may occur in the future lives of children and adolescents can be prevented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the dental anomalies (tooth number, size, and structural anomalies) in a group of pediatric dental population and the difference between the genders in terms of the prevalence of these anomalies. Methods: In this retrospective study, digital orthopantomograms belonging to 5000 patients aged 5-14 years, taken at the Faculty of Dentistry of Erciyes University were evaluated. Tooth number anomalies (hypodontia, hyperdontia, anodontia, and mesiodens) and dental pathology (odontoma and cyst-tumor) were evaluated in orthopantomograms. The frequencies of dental anomalies were compared, and their distribution by gender was examined using descriptive tests and chi-square tests. Result: Of 5000 patients, 169 (3.38%) had 1 dental anomaly. Of the patients, 137 (81%) had hypodontia, 27 (15.9%) hyperdontia, 6 (3.5%) mesiodens, 2 (1.1%) odontoma, and (1.7%) cysts-tumor-like structures. The prevalence of hypodontia was found to be higher in girls than in boys (P .05). Conclusion: Whether common or rare, dentists should be careful about the presence of dental anomalies while examining their patients. Detecting these anomalies and performing interventions in the required period is important to prevent complications that may occur in the future. In this way, psychological, aesthetic, phonational, and physical problems that may occur in the future lives of children and adolescents can be prevented.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, B., KIZILCI, E., GÜMÜŞ, H., DEMİROĞLU, C. (2022). Prevalence of Tooth Number Anomalies and Their Distribution by Genders. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 115–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/512110

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Dang HQ, Constantine S, Anderson PJ. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J. 2017
  2. 62(2):161- 164. [CrossRef] 2. Şişman Y, Ertaş ET, Dündar M. Genetik Anomalisi Olmayan Iki Oligodonti Olgusu. Sağlık Bilimleri Derg. 2007
  3. Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rahman F. Prevalence of dental anomalies in Indian population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013
  4. 5(4):e183-e186. [CrossRef] 4. Aydinbelge M, Sekerci AE, Caliskan S, Gumus H, Sisman Y, Cantekin K. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of double teeth in primary dentition and associated anomalies in the permanent successors. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017
  5. 20(7):847-851. [CrossRef] 5. Al-Amiri A, Tabbaa S, Preston CB, Al-Jewair T. The prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients at the State University of New York at Buffalo. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013
  6. 14(3):518-523. [CrossRef] 6. Ravindran R, Saji AM. Prevalence of the developmental defects of the enamel in children aged 12-15 years in Kollam district. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016
  7. 6(1):28-33. [CrossRef] 7. Bekiroglu N, Mete S, Ozbay G, Yalcinkaya S, Kargul B. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken from 1,056 Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015
  8. 18(1):8-12. [CrossRef] 8. Pekiner FN, Borahan MO, Gümrü B, Aytugar E. Rate of incidental findings of pathology and dental anomalies in paediatric patients: a radiographic study. MUSBED. 2011
  9. 1(2):112. 9. Cunha MGM, Di Nicollo R, Teramoto L, Fava M. Prevalence of dental anomalies in children analyzed by orthopantomography. Braz Dent Sci. 2013
  10. 16(4):28-33. [CrossRef] 10. Laganà G, Venza N, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Fabi F, Danesi C, Cozza P. Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2017
  11. 17(1):62. [CrossRef] 11. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci. 2011
  12. 53(2):231-238. [CrossRef] 12. Carvalho JC, Vinker F, Declerck D. Malocclusion, dental injuries and dental anomalies in the primary dentition of Belgian children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1998
  13. 8(2):137-141. [CrossRef] 13. Brook AH. Dental anomalies of number, form and size: their prevalence in British school children. J Int Assoc Dent Child. 1974
  14. 5(2):37-53. 14. Ravn JJ. Aplasia, supernumerary teeth and fused teeth in the primary dentition: an epidemiologic study. Scand J Dent Res. 1971
  15. 79(1):1-6. [CrossRef] 15. Gome