Journals / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Biomarkers as an opportunity to stratify for outcome in systemic sclerosis

Pages
193–202
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thisreview will focus on soluble and imaging biomarkers that recently showed promising evidence foroutcome stratification in patients with SSc.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a highly complex disease whose heterogeneity includes multiple aspectsof the condition, such as clinical presentation, progression, extent and type of organ involvement,and clinical outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus far, these features remain not easily predictable both at the patient grouplevel and in a given patient with regard to age at onset and clinical course.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thisreview will focus on soluble and imaging biomarkers that recently showed promising evidence foroutcome stratification in patients with SSc.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a highly complex disease whose heterogeneity includes multiple aspectsof the condition, such as clinical presentation, progression, extent and type of organ involvement,and clinical outcomes. Thus far, these features remain not easily predictable both at the patient grouplevel and in a given patient with regard to age at onset and clinical course. The unpredictable clinicalcourse represents an obstacle to focusing potentially effective treatment in patients that need it themost. At the time of organ involvement and clinical diagnosis, most of the clinical manifestations areirreversible; therefore, predicting outcomes becomes crucial. This can explain the multiple attemptsto identify prognostic, predictive, and monitoring—both soluble and imaging—biomarkers over thepast years. They range from the currently most used biomarkers, the autoantibodies associated withdisease-specific clinical features and course, to the single recently proposed skin, lung, cardiac involvementbiomarkers and to the composite scores capturing multiple aspects of the disease. Thisreview will focus on soluble and imaging biomarkers that recently showed promising evidence foroutcome stratification in patients with SSc.

🔖

Cite This Article

GALDO, F. D., ABİGNANO, G. (2022). Biomarkers as an opportunity to stratify for outcome in systemic sclerosis. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 193–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/511545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Varga J, Trojanowska M, Kuwana M. Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: Recent insights of molecular and cellular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2017
  2. [Crossref] 2. Abignano G, Buch M, Emery P, Del Galdo F. Biomarkers in the management of scleroderma: An update. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2011
  3. [Crossref] 3. Abignano G, Del Galdo F. Quantitating skin fibrosis: Innovative strategies and their clinical implications. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2014
  4. [Crossref] 4. Skaug B, Assassi S. Biomarkers in systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2019
  5. [Crossref] 5. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) resource [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): Food and drug administration (US)
  6. Available from: URL: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338449. 6. Califf RM. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018
  7. [Crossref] 7. Wermuth PJ, Piera-Velazquez S, Rosenbloom J, Jimenez SA. Existing and novel biomarkers for precision medicine in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018
  8. [Crossref] 8. Manetti M. Emerging biomarkers in systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2016
  9. [Crossref] 9. Stochmal A, Czuwara J, Trojanowska M, Rudnicka L. Antinuclear antibodies in systemic sclerosis: An update. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2020
  10. [Crossref] 10. Kuwana M. Circulating anti-nuclear antibodies in systemic sclerosis: Utility in diagnosis and disease subsetting. J Nippon Med Sch 2017
  11. [Crossref] 11. Nihtyanova SI, Denton CP. Autoantibodies as predictive tools in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010
  12. [Crossref] 12. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2013
  13. [Crossref] 13. Shah AA, Rosen A, Hummers L, Wigley F, Casciola- Rosen L. Close temporal relationship between onset of cancer and scleroderma in patients with RNA polymerase I/III antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 2010
  14. [Crossref] 14. Airò P, Ceribelli A, Cavazzana I, Taraborelli M, Zingarelli S, Franceschini F. Malignancies in Italian patients with systemic sclerosis positive for anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies. J Rheumatol 2011
  15. [Crossref] 15. Nikpour M, Hissaria P, Byron J, Sahhar J, Mical