Journals / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

Sistemik sklerozda deri görüntülemesi

Skin imaging in systemic sclerosis

Pages
111–116
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here, we review the use of different imaging techniques for the assessment of skin involvement in patients with SSc, focusing mainly on ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and optical coherence tomography

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fibrotic involvement of the skin is a cardinal feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A palpation-based semi-quantitative score, the modified Rodnan skin score, is widely used for the assessment of skin involvement, but it is entailed by significant limitations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here, we review the use of different imaging techniques for the assessment of skin involvement in patients with SSc, focusing mainly on ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and optical coherence tomography
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fibrotic involvement of the skin is a cardinal feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The extent of skin involvement is associated with internal organ involvement, coinciding with more severe disease course and poor prognosis. A palpation-based semi-quantitative score, the modified Rodnan skin score, is widely used for the assessment of skin involvement, but it is entailed by significant limitations. More objective approaches to measure skin involvement employing imaging have been explored continuously in the past decades and are currently advancing. Here, we review the use of different imaging techniques for the assessment of skin involvement in patients with SSc, focusing mainly on ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and optical coherence tomography

Özet

Derinin fibrotik tutulumu sistemik sklerozun (SSc) başlıca özelliğidir. Deri tutulumu yaygınlığı iç organ tutulumu ile ilişkili olup daha şiddetli hastalık seyri ve kötü prognoz ile bir aradadır. Palpasyon-tabanlı yarı-kantitatif skor olan modifiye Rodnan deri skoru deri tutulumu değerlendirilmesi için yaygın olarak kullanılır, ancak önemli sınırlılıklara yol açar. Deri tutulumunu değerlendirmek için görüntüleme kullanan daha objektif yaklaşımlar geçmiş dekatlarda sürekli araştırılmıştır ve halen geliştirilmektedir. Biz burada SSc hastalarında deri tutulumunun değerlendirilmesi için farklı görüntüleme tekniklerinin kullanımını özellikle ultrason, manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ve optik koherens tomografiye odaklanarak gözden geçirdik.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMERY, P., KANG, T., LETTİERİ, G., WAKEFİELD, R. J., GALDO, F. D., ABİGNANO, G. (2022). Sistemik sklerozda deri görüntülemesi. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 111–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/511850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, John- son SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classifica- tion criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1747-55. [CrossRef] Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr. Improvement in skin thickening in systemic sclerosis associated with improved survival. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2001; 44: 2828-35. [CrossRef] Clements PJ, Lachenbruch PA, Ng SC, Simmons M, Sterz M, Furst DE. Skin score. A semiquanti- tative measure of cutaneous involvement that improves prediction of prognosis in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis and rheumatism 1990; 33: 1256-63. [CrossRef] Merkel PA, Clements PJ, Reveille JD, Suarez-Al- mazor ME, Valentini G, Furst DE, et al. Current status of outcome measure development for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis. Report from OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1630-47.
  2. Pope JE, Baron M, Bellamy N, Campbell J, Carette S, Chalmers I, et al. Variability of skin scores and clinical measurements in scleroder- ma. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1271-6.
  3. Clements PJ, Lachenbruch PA, Seibold JR, Zee B, Steen VD, Brennan P, et al. Skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis: an assessment of interob- server variability in 3 independent studies. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 1892-6.
  4. Furst D, Khanna D, Matucci-Cerinic M, Clements P, Steen V, Pope J, et al. Systemic sclerosis - continu- ing progress in developing clinical measures of response. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1194-200.
  5. Kang T, Emery P, Wakefield RJ. A brief history of ultrasound in rheumatology: where we are now. Clinical and experimental Rheumatology 2014; 32: S7-11. Abignano G, Aydin SZ, Castillo-Gallego C, Liakouli V, Woods D, Meekings A, et al. Virtual skin biopsy by optical coherence tomography: the first quan- titative imaging biomarker for scleroderma. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1845-51. [CrossRef] Alexander H, Miller DL. Determining skin thick- ness with pulsed ultra sound. J Invest Dermatol 1979; 72: 17-9. [CrossRef] Serup J. Quantification of acrosclerosis: measure- ment of skin thickness and skin-phalanx distance in females with 15 MHz pulsed ultrasound. Acta dermato-venereologica 1984; 64: 35-40.
  6. Myers SL, Cohen JS, Sheets PW, Bies JR. B-mode ul- trasound evaluation of skin thickness in progressive systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 1986; 13: 577-80.
  7. Dines KA, Sheets PW, Brink JA, Hanke CW, Con- dra KA, Clendenon JL, et al. High frequency ul- trasonic imaging of skin: experimental re