Journals / European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Socio-demographic and Subjective Factors Related to a Psychosocial and Biomedical Model of Successful Ageing

Pages
124–130
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future research in this field can measure SA by creating an index that includes components of Rowe and Kahn’s modeland psychosocial indicators of SA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: With the number and proportion of older adults increasing worldwide, successful ageing (SA) has become a global goal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimedto examine the association of subjective age, health and socio-demographic factors with the biomedical and psychosocial dimensions of SA.Materials and Methods: A total of 61 adults, aged ≥50 (mean age 67.1±9.4) years, living in nursing homes or in the community, were asked toanswer a series of questions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future research in this field can measure SA by creating an index that includes components of Rowe and Kahn’s modeland psychosocial indicators of SA.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: With the number and proportion of older adults increasing worldwide, successful ageing (SA) has become a global goal. This study aimedto examine the association of subjective age, health and socio-demographic factors with the biomedical and psychosocial dimensions of SA.Materials and Methods: A total of 61 adults, aged ≥50 (mean age 67.1±9.4) years, living in nursing homes or in the community, were asked toanswer a series of questions. A biomedical model of SA was measured by Rowe and Kahn’s criteria (i.e. being free of disease and disability, havinghigh physical and cognitive functioning and being actively engaged in life). A psychological well-being scale was used as an indicator of successfulpsychosocial ageing.Results: Our analysis revealed that being married and younger by chronological age, having a high educational level, having a younger subjectiveage and having better subjective health are correlated with both the biomedical and psychosocial dimensions of SA. Neither gender nor the numberof children was correlated with these dimensions.Conclusion: The biomedical and psychosocial dimensions of SA are associated with similar socio-demographic factors along with subjective healthand age. These findings suggest that subjective age and health status, which are changeable and relatively under the control of the individuals, areimportant to promote SA. Future research in this field can measure SA by creating an index that includes components of Rowe and Kahn’s modeland psychosocial indicators of SA.

🔖

Cite This Article

IRMAK, T. Y., SOYLU, C. (2022). Socio-demographic and Subjective Factors Related to a Psychosocial and Biomedical Model of Successful Ageing. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 124–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/511214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hamid TA, Momtaz YA, Ibrahim R. Predictors and prevalence of successful aging among older Malaysians. Gerontology 2012;58:366-370
  2. United Nations. World Population Ageing 2019.Available from: https:// www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/ WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Report.pdf 3. Bowling A, Dieppe P. What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ 2005;331:1548-1551
  3. McLaughlin SJ, Connell CM, Heeringa SG, Li LW, Roberts JS. Successful aging in the United States: prevalence estimates from a national sample of older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010;65B:216-226
  4. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging. Gerontologist 1997;37:433-440
  5. Cosco TD, Prina AM, Perales J, Stephan BC, Brayne C. Operational definitions of successful aging: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2014;26:373- 381
  6. Stephan Y, Demulier V, Terracciano A. Personality, self-rated health, and subjective age in a life-span sample: the moderating role of chronological age. Psychol Aging 2012;27:875-880
  7. John D, Lang FR. Subjective acceleration of time experience in everyday life across adulthood. Dev Psychol 2015;51:1824-1839
  8. Ferri C, James I, Pruchno R. Successful aging: Definitions and subjective assessment according to older adults. Clin Gerontol 2009;32:379-388
  9. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowıtz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of Illness in the Aged. The index of Adl: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914-919
  10. Pehlivanoğlu EFÖ, Özkan MU, Balcıoğlu H, Bilge U, Ünlüoğlu İ. Adjustment and reliability of katz daily life activity measures for elderly in Turkish. Ank Med J 2018;18:219-223
  11. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969;9:179-186
  12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198
  13. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yaşar R, Engin F. Standardize Mini Mental test’in türk toplumunda hafif demans tanisinda geçerlik ve güvenilirliği [Reliability and validity of the standardized Mini Mental State Examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in Turkish population]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2002;13:273-281
  14. Brandt M, Deindl C, Hank K. Tracing the origins of successful aging: the role of childhood conditions and social inequality in explaining later life health. Soc Sci M