SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

TERÖR VE YAPISAL GERÇEKÇİLİK: KÜRESEL ANARŞİDE AKTÖRLÜK İDDİASININ KURAMSAL AÇIKLAMASI

Davut ATEŞ
Pages
1–23
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, locus of terrorism in realist paradigm will be discussed; by following the example of September 11 it will be examined why global terrorism couldn’t be theoretically situated in the paradigm; and it will be tried to show that it is possible to conceptualize global terrorism within realism by reconsidering its certain assumptions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the occasion of September 11 in the United States there emerged a wide consensus that international relations came to a new stage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, the view is widening, which claims that realism and its contemporary versions structural- assuming that international relations are composed of power politics among states and decisive actors in the anarchy are states are incapable, within its existing paradigm, to explain the phenomenon of terrorism acquiring global characteristics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, locus of terrorism in realist paradigm will be discussed; by following the example of September 11 it will be examined why global terrorism couldn’t be theoretically situated in the paradigm; and it will be tried to show that it is possible to conceptualize global terrorism within realism by reconsidering its certain assumptions
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Küresel Terör · Yapısal Gerçekçilik · Aktörlük

Abstract

After the occasion of September 11 in the United States there emerged a wide consensus that international relations came to a new stage. Accordingly, the view is widening, which claims that realism and its contemporary versions structural- assuming that international relations are composed of power politics among states and decisive actors in the anarchy are states are incapable, within its existing paradigm, to explain the phenomenon of terrorism acquiring global characteristics. In this paper, locus of terrorism in realist paradigm will be discussed; by following the example of September 11 it will be examined why global terrorism couldn’t be theoretically situated in the paradigm; and it will be tried to show that it is possible to conceptualize global terrorism within realism by reconsidering its certain assumptions

Özet

ABD’de yaşanan 11 Eylül olayının ardından uluslararası ilişkilerde yeni bir evreye girildiği konusunda geniş bir kabul oluşmaya başlamıştır. Eşzamanlı olarak, uluslararası ilişkilerin devletler arasındaki güç ilişkisinden oluştuğunu, anarşide karar verici aktörlerin sadece devletler olduğunu varsayan gerçekçilik ve onun çağdaş yorumu yapısalcılığın, küresel nitelik kazanmaya başlayan terör olgusunu mevcut yaygınlaşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, terörün gerçekçilik paradigmasındaki yeri tartışılacak; 11 Eylül örneği üzerinden küresel terörün paradigmaya neden uymadığı incelenecek; ve gerçekçi varsayımlardaki birkısım dönüşümlerle küresel terörün gerçekçilik kuramı çerçevesinde kavramlaştırılmasının mümkün olduğu gösterilmeye çalışılacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, D. (2008). TERÖR VE YAPISAL GERÇEKÇİLİK: KÜRESEL ANARŞİDE AKTÖRLÜK İDDİASININ KURAMSAL AÇIKLAMASI. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/51083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abbott, K.W., R.O. Keohane, A. Moravcsik, A. Slaughter, ve D. Snidal; 2000; ‘‘The Concept of Legalization’’, International Organization; Volume 54; No.3; 401-419.
  2. Akuhata-Brown, M.; 1999; Civil society at the Millennium; West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
  3. Albrow, M.; 1997; The Global Age: State and Society beyong Modernity; Standford CA: Standford University Press.
  4. Anderson, P.; 1974; Lineages of Absolutist State; London: Verso. Bartley, C.M.; 2005; ‘‘The Art of Terrorism: What Sun Tzu can Teach us about International Terrorism’’; Comparative Strategy; Volume 24; No.3; 237-251.
  5. Borum, R. ve M. Gelles; 2005; ‘‘Al-Qaeda’s Operational Evolution: Behavioural and Organizational Perspectives’’; Behavioural Sciences and Law; Volume 23; No.4; 467-483.
  6. Boyer, R.; 1996; States Sgainst Markets: The Limits of Globalization; London: Routledge. Buzan, B., C. Jones, ve R. Little; 1993; Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism; New York: Colombia University Press.
  7. Chomsky, N.; 2002; ‘‘Who are the Global Terrorists?’’; İçinde: Ken Booth and Tim Dunne ed. Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Clark, I.; 1997; Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the 21. Century; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Cronin, A.K.; 2002; ‘‘Behind the Curve: Globalization and International Terrorism’’; International Security; Volume 27; No.3; 30-58.
  9. Duyvesteyn, I.; 2004; ‘‘How New is the New Terrorism?’’; Studies in Conflict&Terrorism; Volume 27; No.5; 439-454.
  10. Garrison, A.; 2003; ‘‘ Terrorism: The Nature of its History’’, Criminal Justices Studies; Volume 16; No.1; 39-52. El-Kaide bugün ortada duran en önemli örnek olmakla birlikte, önümüzdeki dönemde başka örgütlerin de benzer yollara başvurmasına sıklıkla rastlanabilecektir. Garrison, A.; 2004; ‘‘Defining Terrorism: Philosophy of the Bomb, Propaganda by Deed and Challenge through Fear and Violence’’; Criminal Justice Studies; Volume 17; No.3; 259-279.
  11. Gearson, J.; 2002; ‘‘The Nature of Modern Terrorism’’; Political Quarterly; Volume 73; No.1; 7-24.
  12. Gordon, A.; 2005; ‘‘Terrorism as and Academic Subject after 9/11: Searching the Internet Reveals, a Stockholm Syndrome Trend’’; Studies in Conflict and Terrorism; Volume 28; No.1; 45-59.
  13. Gurr, T.; 1970; Why Men Rebel?; Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. Gün, Ö.R.; 2000; ‘‘Uluslararası Terörizm: Dünya Savaşının Yeni Boyutu’’; Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi; Cilt 2; No.4; 79-93.
  15. Hill, C.;