SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Sanayi Devrimi: Küreselleşme Sürecinin Arkasındaki İtici Güç

Industrial Revolution: Impetus Behind the Globalization Process

Davut ATEŞ
Pages
31–48
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, I will argue that industrial revolution that resulted in the emergence of industrial capitalism is one the most important factors behind globalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are many arguments related to the origins of globalization process that we are more blatantly experiencing for the last few decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But few of them focus on the effects of industrial revolution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, I will argue that industrial revolution that resulted in the emergence of industrial capitalism is one the most important factors behind globalization.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are many arguments related to the origins of globalization process that we are more blatantly experiencing for the last few decades. But few of them focus on the effects of industrial revolution. In this paper, I will try to set a direct connection between industrial revolution and globalization process. For this aim, transformations as a result of industrial revolution in Europe will be reviewed within the context of capitalist mode of production, marketing and consumption. Thus, I will argue that industrial revolution that resulted in the emergence of industrial capitalism is one the most important factors behind globalization.

Özet

Son birkaç on yıldır güçlü bir sekilde tecrübe etmeye basladıgımız küresellesme sürecinin kökenine iliskin birçok iddia bulunmaktadır. Ancak, bunların pek azı sanayi devriminin sahip oldugu etkilere deginir. Bu çalısmada, sanayi devrimi ile küresellesme süreci arasında dogrudan bir bag kurmaya çalısacagım. Bu amaca yönelik olarak, sanayi devrimi sonrasında Avrupa’da yasanan dönüsümler; kapitalist üretim sekli, pazarlama ve tüketim çerçevesinde gözden geçirilecektir. Sonuç olarak, küresellesme sürecinin arkasındaki en önemli faktörlerden birinin sanayi kapitlizmine yol veren sanayi devrimi oldugunu göstermeye çalısacagım.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, D. (2022). Sanayi Devrimi: Küreselleşme Sürecinin Arkasındaki İtici Güç. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 31–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/647468

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ALBROW, M., King, E. (1990),
  2. Globalization, Knowledge and Society, London: Sage. AMIN, Samir (1997), Capitalism in the Age of Globalization, London: Zed Books. ANDERSON, Perry (1974),
  3. Lineages of Absolutist State, London: Verso. BAIROCH, P. (1982), ‘‘International Industrialisation Levels from 1750 to 1980’’, Journal of European Economic History, 2, 268-333.
  4. BAIROCH, P. (1993),
  5. Economics and World History, London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf. BIRNIE, Arthur M.A. (1953),
  6. An Economic History of Europe, London: Methuen. BLANQUI, Jerome Adolphe (1968), History of Political Economy in Europe (translated by Emily J. Leonard), New York: Agustus M. Kelley. BRAUDEL, F. (1984), Civilisation and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century: The Perspective of the World, Vol. 3, New York: Harper and Row. CLARK, Ian (1997), Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the 21. Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. CRAFT, N. (1989), ‘‘British Industrialisation in an International Context’’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 19, 415-28.
  8. DEANE, Phyllis (1965),
  9. The First Industrial Revolution, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  10. FARNEN, F. Russell (1994), ‘‘Nationalism, Ethnicity, National Identity and Multiculturalism: Concluding Observations’’. In Russel F. Farnen (ed.), Nationalism, Ethnicity and Identity, New Brunswick: Translation Publishers.
  11. FRIEDMAN, Jonathan (1992), ‘‘Global System, Globalization and the Parameters of Modernity’’. In Mike Feathersone, Scott Lash, Roland Robertson (eds.), Global Modernities, London: Sage. GIDDENS, Anthony (1990),
  12. The Consequences of Modernity, Standford: Standford University Press.
  13. GILL, Stephen (2000), ‘‘Globalization, Market, Civilization, and Disciplinary Liberalism’’. In Andrew Linklater (ed.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, London: Routledge. GOULET, Denis (2002), ‘‘Inequalities in the Light of Globalization’’, Kroc Institute Occasional Paper, No 22:OP:2, University of Notre Dame. GREENFIELD, Liah (2001),
  14. The Spirit of Capitalism, Nationalism and Economic Growth, Harvard: Harvard University Press GREIDER, W. (1997), One World Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism, New York: Simon&Schuster. HENDERSON, W.O. (1961), Industrial Revolution on the Continent, London: Frank Casss&Co. Ltd. HILL, Christopher (1969),
  15. Reformation to Industrial Revolution, England: Penguin Books. HOBSBAWM, E.C. (1962), The Age of Revolution:1789-1848, New York: A Mantor Book. HOBSBAWM, E.C. (1968), Industry