SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Archives of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Sections Performed in the Second Stage of Labor

Gizem PEKTAŞ
Büşra CAMBAZTEPE
Burak ARSLAN
Fatma Didem YÜCEL YETİŞKİN
Aras PEKTAŞ
Veli MİHMANLI
Pages
54–59
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant difference in terms of blood transfusionrequirement and neonatal complications between two groups.Conclusion: Maternal morbidity risk is significantly higher in cesarean sections performed in the second stage of labor than in the first stage of labor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in cesarean deliveries in the first and second stage of labor.Methods: Sixty-five patients who had caesarean section in the second stage of labor and 90 patients who had caserean section in the first stage oflabor were compared in terms of maternal and neonatal complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patient data was obtained from patient files and hospital electronic systemrecords.Results: Of the 155 patients included in the study, 58.1% (n=90) had a cesarean section in the first stage of labor and 41.9% (n=65) in the second stageof labor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant difference in terms of blood transfusionrequirement and neonatal complications between two groups.Conclusion: Maternal morbidity risk is significantly higher in cesarean sections performed in the second stage of labor than in the first stage of labor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in cesarean deliveries in the first and second stage of labor.Methods: Sixty-five patients who had caesarean section in the second stage of labor and 90 patients who had caserean section in the first stage oflabor were compared in terms of maternal and neonatal complications. Patient data was obtained from patient files and hospital electronic systemrecords.Results: Of the 155 patients included in the study, 58.1% (n=90) had a cesarean section in the first stage of labor and 41.9% (n=65) in the second stageof labor. The incidence of intraoperative surgical complication and postoperative endomyometritis was significantly higher in the cesarean section inthe second stage of labor compared to the cesarean section in the first stage of labor. There was no significant difference in terms of blood transfusionrequirement and neonatal complications between two groups.Conclusion: Maternal morbidity risk is significantly higher in cesarean sections performed in the second stage of labor than in the first stage of labor.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKTAŞ, G., CAMBAZTEPE, B., ARSLAN, B., YETİŞKİN, F. D. Y., PEKTAŞ, A., MİHMANLI, V. (2022). Evaluation of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Sections Performed in the Second Stage of Labor. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 54–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/510457

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:750-4
  2. Koc I. Increased cesarean section rates in Turkey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003;8:1-10
  3. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;24:436-7
  4. Lilford RJ, Groot VC, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective ) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-exiting physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990;97:883-92
  5. Nielson TF, Hökegard KH. Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:911-6
  6. Nielsen TF, Hokegard KH. Cesarean section and intraoperative surgical complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984;63:103-11
  7. Van Ham MA, Van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;74:1-6
  8. Smith JF, Hernandez C, Wax JR. Fetal laceration injury at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:344-50
  9. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a metaanalysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:465-535
  10. Sakala C. Medically unnecessary cesarean section births: introduction to a symposium. Soc Sci Med 1993;37:1177-275
  11. Güney M, Uzun E, Oral B, Sarıkan İ, Bayhan G, Mungan T. Kliniğimizde 2001- 2005 yılları arasında sezaryen oranı ve endikasyonları. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Derg 2006;3:249-54
  12. Yılmaz E, Kara M, Okumuş B, Aran E. Ağrı il Merkezinde 2004 ve 2007 yıllarındaki Doğumların Karşılaştırılması. Perinatoloji Derg 2008;16:26-31
  13. Yıldız A, Köksal A, Çukurova K, Keklik A, Çelik N, İvit H. Bir Obstetri Kliniğinde 15 yıllık period süresince sezaryen oranları ve endikasyonlarının yıllara göre dağılımı. Nobel Med 2010;6:10-14
  14. Muula SD. Ethical and Practical Consideration of Women Choosing Cesarean Section Deliveries without “Medical Indication” in Developing Countries. Croat Med J 2007;48:94-102
  15. Yumru E, Davas İ, Baksu B, Altıntaş A, Altın A, Mert M. 1995-1999 yılları arasında sezaryan operasyonu oranları ve endikasyonları. Perinatoloji Derg 2000;8:94-8
  16. Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Cesarean section for non-medical reas