Journals / European Archives of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the Effects of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco “Maras Powder” Use on Pulmonary Function, Electrocardiogram and Other Parameters

Pages
233–240
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Social awareness must be created forsmokeless tobacco use in order to fight this habitual threat to public health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Through the years, tobacco has been used in many ways.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Physical examination findings, ECG findings, results of pulmonary functiontests, results of biochemical analysis including complete blood count and lipid profile of all participants were recorded on admission.Results: The risk of mouth sores was 7.9 times higher in the Maras powder group due to direct contact to the oral mucosa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Social awareness must be created forsmokeless tobacco use in order to fight this habitual threat to public health.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Through the years, tobacco has been used in many ways. While the most common way of consumption is through smoking cigarettes, smokeless use bychewing or nasal snuffing are also quite common. Smokeless tobacco, also named “Maras powder”, is generally used as a substitute to reduce or quit smoking. Theeffects of smokeless tobacco use on the immune system, respiratory system and cardiovascular system have been extensively researched. In our study, we aimed toinvestigate the effects of Maras powder on the respiratory, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and biochemical methods.Methods: One hundred and forty-nine cases were included and the cases were classified into the following four groups: only using Maras powder; using Maras powderand smoking; only smoking and control group neither smoking nor using Maras powder. Physical examination findings, ECG findings, results of pulmonary functiontests, results of biochemical analysis including complete blood count and lipid profile of all participants were recorded on admission.Results: The risk of mouth sores was 7.9 times higher in the Maras powder group due to direct contact to the oral mucosa. There is a relationship between the daily usefrequency of smokeless tobacco and the development of oral wounds, but the total period of use or the duration in mouth was not related to this situation. The ECGfindings of both the smoking and Maras powder consuming group was found to be significantly higher than the control group.Conclusion: The smokeless tobacco use, which is considered as an alternative way of quitting smoking, does not have adverse effects on respiratory functions. However,it is an important risk factor for many life-threatening health conditions such as ECG abnormalities and occurrence of oral lesions. Social awareness must be created forsmokeless tobacco use in order to fight this habitual threat to public health.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATİLLA, N., IRMAK, İ., ARPAĞ, H., GÜNEY, P. A., KASAPOĞLU, U. S., TAYLAN, M. (2022). Comparison of the Effects of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco “Maras Powder” Use on Pulmonary Function, Electrocardiogram and Other Parameters. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 233–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/510439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ashley DL, Burns D, Djordjevic M, Dybing E, Gray N, Hammond SK, et al; WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2008;1-277, 1 p following 277
  2. Örsel O. Dünyada kullanılan tütün çesitleri. www.toraks.org.tr/sub/sigarasiz/ DunyadaKullanilanTutunUrunleriosman orsel.pdf. Son erisim 07.12.2009
  3. Kafas A: Analysis of factors affecting cigarete smoking and Maras powder use among adults in the urban area of Kahramanmaras. Master’s Thesis, Institute of Science, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Turkey, 2011, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ SearchTez 4. Sucaklı MH, Kahraman H, Çelik M, Keten HS. An Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavior regarding Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco (Maras Powder) Use among High School Children. Gaziantep Med J 2015;21:225-32
  4. Erenmemisoğlu A, Tekol Y, Kartal M, Kurucu S. The use of smokeless tobacco in our country “Maras Powder”. Turk J Med Sci 1992;16:567-76
  5. Büyükbese MA, Köksal N, Güven A, Çetinkaya A. Effects of smokeless tobacco “Maras Powder” use on respiratory function. Tohoku J Exp Med 2004;204:173-8
  6. Ozkul Y, Donmez H, Erenmemisoglu A, Demirtas H, Imamoglu N. Induction of micronuclei by smokeless tobacco on buccal mucosa cells of habitual users. Mutagenesis 1997;12:285-7
  7. Köksal N, Güven A, Çetinkaya A. Büyükbese MA. Dumansız Tütün “Maras Otu” Kullanımının Solunum Fonksiyonları Üzerine Olan Etkileri. Akciger Arsivi 2004;5:174-8
  8. Kiowski W, Linder L, Stoschitzky K, Pfisterer M, Burckhardt D, Burkart F, et al. Diminished vascular response to inhibition of endothelium-derived nitric oxide and enhanced vasoconstriction to exogenously administered endothelin-1 in clinically healthy smokers. Circulation 1994;90:27-34
  9. Powell JT, Higman DJ. Smoking, nitric oxide and the endothelium. Br J Surg 1994;81:785-7
  10. Güven A, Köksal N, Büyükbese MA, Çetinkaya A, Sökmen G, Aksu E, et al. Effects of Using a Different Kind of Smokeless Tobacco on Cardiac Parameters: “Maras powder”. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 2003;3:230-5
  11. Kılınç M, Okur E, Yıldırım I, Inanç F, Kurutas EB. The Investigation of the Effect of Maras Powder (Smokeless Tobacco) on Hematological Parameters. Turk J Haematol 2004;21:131-6
  12. Goo MJ. Smokeless Tobacco. The Health Conseoquences of Snuff and Chewing Tobacco. Nurse Practitioner 1992;17:24-36
  13. Rodu B. An Alternatine Approach to Smoking Contro