Journals / European Archives of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Hysteroscopy in Infertile Patients

Pages
126–131
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the operative hysteroscopy subgroups, the highest rates ofclinical pregnancy and live birth were in patients undergoing endometrial polyp and septum resection, and abortion rates were highest in T-shaped uterus and septumresection groups.Conclusion: We concluded that treatment of uterine cavity pathologies with operative hysteroscopy in infertile patients provided similar clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates to patients who have normal uterine cavity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hysteroscopy results in infertile patients and to compare the clinical pregnancy, live birth and abortion ratesbetween patients with uterine cavity abnormalities treated with operative hysteroscopy and patients with normal uterine cavity.Methods: Three hundred and nineteen patients who underwent hysteroscopy for infertility between January 2010 and December 2015 were included in the study.The patients were divided into two main groups: diagnostic and operative.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Clinical pregnancy, live birth and abortion rates were compared between thegroups.Results: The demographic and laboratory characteristics of the diagnostic (n=74) and operative hysteroscopy (n=245) groups were similar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the operative hysteroscopy subgroups, the highest rates ofclinical pregnancy and live birth were in patients undergoing endometrial polyp and septum resection, and abortion rates were highest in T-shaped uterus and septumresection groups.Conclusion: We concluded that treatment of uterine cavity pathologies with operative hysteroscopy in infertile patients provided similar clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates to patients who have normal uterine cavity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hysteroscopy results in infertile patients and to compare the clinical pregnancy, live birth and abortion ratesbetween patients with uterine cavity abnormalities treated with operative hysteroscopy and patients with normal uterine cavity.Methods: Three hundred and nineteen patients who underwent hysteroscopy for infertility between January 2010 and December 2015 were included in the study.The patients were divided into two main groups: diagnostic and operative. The patients who had normal uterine cavity in exploration and who did not require surgicalintervention were referred as diagnostic hysteroscopy group. Patients who underwent surgical intervention during the procedure were named as operative hysteroscopygroup. The operative hysteroscopy group was divided into groups as endometrial polyp, submucous myoma, septum, adhesions and T-shaped uterus. Demographicdata, laboratory parameters and pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopy were recorded. Clinical pregnancy, live birth and abortion rates were compared between thegroups.Results: The demographic and laboratory characteristics of the diagnostic (n=74) and operative hysteroscopy (n=245) groups were similar. After operative hysteroscopy,53.9% of the patients had clinical pregnancy and 41.3% of them had live birth. In the diagnostic hysteroscopy group, the clinical pregnancy rate was 55.2% and the livebirth rate was 41.7%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. In addition, there was no differencebetween the two groups in terms of pregnancy acquisition methods and mean duration of conception. In the operative hysteroscopy subgroups, the highest rates ofclinical pregnancy and live birth were in patients undergoing endometrial polyp and septum resection, and abortion rates were highest in T-shaped uterus and septumresection groups.Conclusion: We concluded that treatment of uterine cavity pathologies with operative hysteroscopy in infertile patients provided similar clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates to patients who have normal uterine cavity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESKALEN, Ş., ÇAKMAK, B. D., ÖÇAL, K. P. B., SOFİYEVA, N. (2022). Evaluation of Hysteroscopy in Infertile Patients. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 126–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/510422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013;99:63
  2. Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R, et al. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1324-31.e1
  3. Fritz MA. Female infertility. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 8th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010
  4. Féghali J, Bakar J, Mayenga JM, Ségard L, Hamou J, Driguez P, et al. Systematic hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2003;31:127- 31
  5. Kılınç H, Cengiz H, Kaya C, Ekin M, Yaşar L. Endometrial Patolojilerin Değerlendirilmesinde Transvajinal Ultrasonografi ile Ofis Histeroskopinin Karşılaştırılması. Yeni Tıp Dergisi 2012;29:23-6
  6. Crosignani PG, Rubin BL. Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod 2000;15:723-32
  7. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. Clinical guideline 2004;11:23
  8. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013) Fertility problems: assessment and treatment.Clinical guideline 2013. The web site: http//www. nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156
  9. El-Toukhy T, Campo R, Khalaf Y, Tabanelli C, Gianaroli L, Gordts SS, et al. Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016 25;2614-21
  10. Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJC, Koks CAM, van Golde R, Nap AW, et al. Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 201625;387:2622-29
  11. Rama Raju GA, Shashi Kumari G, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Assessment of uterine cavity by hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction programme and its influence on pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006;274:160-4
  12. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Di Carlo C, Minozzi S, Spinelli M, Pistotti V, Alviggi C, et al. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:479-96
  13. Varasteh NN, Neuwirth RS, Levin B, Keltz MD. Pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy and myomectomy in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:168-71
  14. Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, S