Journals / European Archives of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

Fixation of Posterior Malleolus is Enough for Syndesmotic Stability: Fact or Fiction?

Pages
239–245
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Not all, but PM fractures with syndesmotic displacement should be operated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate syndesmotic stability following anatomic reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolus (PM) of ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability, without utilizing a classical syndesmotic screw.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated patients with PM fracture and syndesmotic displacement between September 2012 and May 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Not all, but PM fractures with syndesmotic displacement should be operated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate syndesmotic stability following anatomic reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolus (PM) of ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability, without utilizing a classical syndesmotic screw. Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated patients with PM fracture and syndesmotic displacement between September 2012 and May 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with (1) PM fracture, either isolated or a part of bi-/trimalleolar fracture with syndesmotic instability; (2) fractures fixed through a posterior approach; (3) fractures fixed with either screw or plate-screw combination; and (4) Bartonicek type 2-5 fractures. Among 145 patients, 41 (27 female, 14 male) met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 42.65 years, and the mean follow-up time was 19.41 months. Ankle fractures were classified according to the Weber classification, while PM fractures according to the Bartonicek classification. Perioperative reduction was evaluated by anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views. Perioperative and postoperative stability was evaluated using Cotton and fibular translation tests. Postoperative syndemotic reduction was evaluated with computed tomography (CT) scan according to Dikos and Futamura. Results: According to the Weber classification, 22 were type B, 17 type C, and 2 unclassified because they did not get lateral malleolus fracture. According to Bartonicek classification, 17 fractures (41.5%) were type 2, 14 (34.1%) type 3, 9 (22%) type 4, and 1 (2.4%) type 5. All patients had unilateral fractures. On postoperative CT scan evaluation, 38 (92.68%) patients got syndesmotic reduction, and 3 (7.32%) got syndesmotic malreduction. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that if appropriate surgical principles are followed, and meticulous attention paid for reduction and fixation, fixing only the PM achieves syndesmotic stability for patients with PM fracture and syndesmotic diastasis. The indication for PM fixation should not be based on size alone. Not all, but PM fractures with syndesmotic displacement should be operated.

🔖

Cite This Article

BACA, E., ZİROĞLU, N. (2022). Fixation of Posterior Malleolus is Enough for Syndesmotic Stability: Fact or Fiction?. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 239–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/510378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Solan MC, Sakellariou A. Posterior malleolus fractures: worth fixing. Bone Joint J 2017;99:1413-9
  2. Wang Xu, Yin J, Zhang C, Wang C, Geng X, Ma X, et al. Biomechanical study of screw fixation and plate fixation of a posterior malleolar fracture in a simulation of the normal gait cycle. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38:1132-8
  3. Tejwani NC, Pahk B, Egol KA. Effect of posterior malleolus fracture on outcome after unstable ankle fracture. J Trauma 2010;69:666-9
  4. Van den Bekerom MP, Haverkamp D, Kloen P. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of posterior malleolar fractures. A systematic review of the literature. J Trauma 2009;66:279-84
  5. McLaughlin H. Injuries of the ankle. Trauma; 1959 p. 357-60
  6. Meijer DT, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, Mallee WH, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs. Injury 2015;46:2024-9
  7. Bartonicek J, Rammelt S, Tucek M. Posterior malleolar fractures: changing concepts and recent developments. Foot Ankle Clin 2017;22:125-45
  8. Lilyquist M, Shaw A, Latz K, Bogener J, Wentz B. Cadaveric analysis of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37:882-90
  9. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SD, Hedman TP. Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 1994;10:558-60
  10. Gardner MJ, Brodsky A, Briggs SM, Nielson JH, Lorich DG. Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;447:165-71
  11. Tenenbaum S, Shazar N, Bruck N, Bariteau J. Posterior malleolus ractures. Orthopedic Clin North Am 2017;48:81-9
  12. Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, Weber TG. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:433-8
  13. Futamura K, Baba T, Mogami A, Morohashi I, Kanda A, Obayashi O, et al. Malreduction of syndesmosis injury associated with malleolar ankle fracture can be avoided using Weber’s three indexes in the mortise view. Injury 2017;48:954-9
  14. Verhage SM, Boot F, Schipper IB, Hoogendoorn JM. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures using the posterolateral approach. Bone Joint J 2016;98:812-7
  15. Mulligan EP. Evaluation and management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Phys Ther Sport 2017;12:57-69
  16. Stark E, Tornetta P, Creevy WR. Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:643-6
  17. Miller MA, McDonald TC, Graves ML, Spitl