Journals / European Archives of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Outcomes of Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis with Single Cannulated Screw

Pages
153–157
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We suggest that in SCFE cases requiring urgent surgery, the mild reduction can be considered, and subsequent osteosynthesis with a single screw is a sufficient treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) or epiphysiolysis is a common pathology that requires urgent surgical intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We examined 13 hips of 12 patients treated with SCFE and evaluated mid-term results in our study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We suggest that in SCFE cases requiring urgent surgery, the mild reduction can be considered, and subsequent osteosynthesis with a single screw is a sufficient treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) or epiphysiolysis is a common pathology that requires urgent surgical intervention. This study aims at evaluating clinical and radiological mid-term results of our patients diagnosed with SCFE and fixed with a single cannulated screw. Methods: We examined 13 hips of 12 patients treated with SCFE and evaluated mid-term results in our study. Results: All of our patients were male with a mean age of 11.8 years (range 7-15). The mean slip angle was calculated as 43.20 degrees (range 26-70), and the average length of follow-up was 19 months (range 14-29 months). The average body mass index was 26.8 (range 24.4- 29.7), and 11 patients were overweight (91.7%). Concerning ambulation, 7 patients had stable SCFE (58.3%), and 5 had unstable SCFE (41.6%). According to the Southwick classification, the average sliding angle of the patients was 43.2 degrees (range 26-70). Fixation was performed with a single cannulated screw for all patients. No patients were applied screws to the opposite hip for prophylactic purposes. Loss of reduction was not observed in any of our patients who followed up on average for 19 months (range 14 to 29). In radiological follow-ups, SCFE was not observed in the opposite hip of any patient. The postoperative range of motion was normal in all patients. Shortness and limping were not observed in any case. Conclusion: We suggest that in SCFE cases requiring urgent surgery, the mild reduction can be considered, and subsequent osteosynthesis with a single screw is a sufficient treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEN, T., PEHLİVAN, A. T. (2022). Outcomes of Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis with Single Cannulated Screw. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 153–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/510305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Lehmann CL, Arons RR, Loder RT, Vitale MG. The epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an update. J Pediatr Orthop 2006;26:286-90
  2. Georgiadis AG, Zaltz I. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: How to evaluate with a review and update of treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am 2014;61:1119-35
  3. Naseem H, Chatterji S, Tsang K, Hakimi M, Chytas A, Alshryda S. Treatment of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Systematic review and exploratory patient level analysis. J Orthop Traumatol 2017;18:379-94
  4. Loder RT. The demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. An international multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;8-27
  5. Gholve PA, Cameron DB, Millis MB. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis update. Curr Opin Pediatr 2009;21:39-45
  6. Hägglund G, Hannson LI, Sandström S. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in southern Sweden. Long-term results after nailing/pinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;190-200
  7. Bittersohl B, Hosalkar HS, Zilkens C, Krauspe R. Current concepts in management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Hip Int 2015;25:104- 14
  8. Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:85-95
  9. Southwick WO. Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:807-35
  10. Zahrawi FB, Stephens TL, Spencer GE Jr, Clough JM. Comparative study of pinning in situ and open epiphysiodesis in 105 patients with slipped capital femoral epiphyses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;160-8
  11. Loder RT, Starnes T, Dikos G. Atypical and typical (idiopathic) slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Reconfirmation of the age-weight test and description of the height and age-height tests. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1574-81
  12. Burrow SR, Alman B, Wright JG. Short stature as a screening test for endocrinopathy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:263-8
  13. Slongo T, Kakaty D, Krause F, Ziebarth K. Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with a modified Dunn procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2898-908
  14. Aronson DD, Carlson WE. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A prospective study of fixation with a single screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:810- 9
  15. Boero S, Brunenghi GM, Carbone M, Stella G, Calevo MG. Pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop B 2003;12:372-9
  16. Coppola C, Sadile F, Lo